- May 10, 2018
- 5,165
- 733
- 64
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Skeptic
- Marital Status
- Private
I find it funny how you disregard context as not meaningful when context determines how we interpret everything in life.
I was pulled over once while rushing my wife to the hospital. When I explained the context of why I was speeding to the officer, he did not give me a ticket, but instead gave me an escort. Context matters.
Context is key in properly interpreting and understanding many things, it's really common sense that this is true.
Heck, just google "importance of context" and you'll find no shortage of pages explaining why it is important. The very fact that I even have to say out loud that context is important makes me wonder how serious you actually are about engaging in conversation.
Great, let's see where this goes...
As a preface, here is where I stand on Matthew 12:32:
All passages regarding blasphemy, i.e. Matthew 12:31-32, Mark 3:29-29, and Luke 12:10 are cryptic. Period.
1) To 'speak against', 'blaspheme', or 'speak a word against' are not clarified.
2) The verses do not speak about the point of when you have gone too far, and are damned eternal, no-matter-what.
3) These verses remain ambiguous/vague/undefined.
4) Many, whom read the Bible as literal, would read these, and worry obsessively about not committing such and act. Or, worry that one of their close loved ones may have already committed this act. It appears to present reckless/obscure language; with a rather large threat attached.
Again, we are speaking about God's forgiveness here. And you know what happens to the ones He does not forgive or pardon, right?
What if a 'pharisee-like' individual rejected Jesus wholeheartedly, but, a year later, had a complete change of heart? He realized the error of his ways, dropped to his knees, professed to the real almighty, confessed as a sinner, and committed to follow. According to the undefined and less-than-clarified verses provided, he's toast.
I don't know what dcalling said, but I would suggest that all non-Christians commit the unpardonable sin and no Christians do.
Great. Then I will give you the same answer as I gave to him. The the verses are pointless. Non-Christians are already going to hell, and Christians cannot commit this sin. The verses are like parsley on your dinner plate. Remove it, and no one will notice or complain about it.
However, I have to disagree with your assessment... For the many reasons listed above...
Probably because you're wrong, and they're right? That would be why your conclusion is wrong and theirs is not.
You gave no reason here. Thanks...
Upvote
0