Subduction Zone
Regular Member
so what you are saying is that you have read the mind of the maker of the video and know for a fact that He/she is not mistaken, and has in fact mal-intent to deceive on purpose? Please prove that these are liars. If not, then we have refuted another comment of yours.
I am not a fool. The maker of your video attempts to make fun of Dawkins for his answer. That only demonstrates that the maker of the video was extremely ignorant and as shown by his quoting methodology, very dishonest too.
The very fact that he did not include a link to the source is more than enough evidence to conclude that he is a liar. What excuse did he have for not including that link?
And please, no false statements. You have never refuted one single claim of mine. Plus your logic is extremely faulty, even if I did not "prove" that the dishonest maker of that video is a liar, that would not mean that you had refuted any of my claims.
Upvote
0