The methods and thoroughness we need to employ differ greatly depending on the goals. If we just want to believe infant baptism does something, or the converse, that it does nothing at all, then seeking out passages we can “use” to prove our beliefs true and all opposing beliefs to be false is the way to go. If we want truth we must gather EVERYTHING that might apply first, examine the context, flow of thought, meaning of words as they are used throughout the scriptures … and then see what fits with EVERYTHING that God said with all of the pieces cut straight … then we alter our beliefs and our lives to fit.
Along with seeking to gather ALL of the data that “might” apply, we should always apply interpretation methods designed to get to the truth. These include interpreting the unclear passages in the light of the clear, the less detailed passages in the light of the more detailed …. This also means that all our interpretations should always make God, His Word and His people 100% consistent in all they say and do and don’t say and don’t do. Those that want to ignore consistency are trying to sell you something. When in doubt ALWAYS assume everything is 100% consistent with everything else. (Yes, there are things that were only for certain time periods, were “completed” … and therefore are no longer in place, being done...) If these are not consistent, then there is no truth to find. If that is the case everything is whatever the reader wants to imagine it to be.
No, this is not the thorough study on the topic. This is a gloss over. If you want the thorough study, send me an e-mail. Anything beyond 20 pages is beyond the attention level of everyone but the most thorough truth seekers. If you want it … ask and I will e-mail it to you.
Assuming we want truth, and not just to prove our beliefs true, certain things need to be examined.
- David and Bathsheba’s first child died … no baptism involved, certainly. No profession of faith, no repentance for the child, yet David said, “2Sa 12:23 "But now he has died; why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he will not return to me." . The point being, unless you want to say the man who is after God’s own heart went to hell, we need to be willing to admit that infants at least, if they die, are going to be in heaven.
- There are passages that hint at the concept of being of age and a person being responsible for their own actions being a key to this issue. The statement, “He is of age, ask him.”, in John 9:23, for example, hints that until a certain age children were the responsibility of their parents. After that age, they were responsible for themselves. Other decisions could not be made until the age of accountability was reached either. One could not be adopted until they reached that age, for example. It had to be a conscious rational decision by both the adopter and the adoptee. Which could not be done until that age was reached. And no, baptism had nothing to do with this “grace” being extended to those who had not yet attained that age. After that age was attained, the Jews threw a party a bat mitzva or a bar mitzva depending on whether your boy or girl was “of age” or not. The key point is that no legal or binding agreements could be made prior to that point and the parents were 100% responsible. After that age it was the adult child themselves who was responsible for all their own decisions and all decisions were legally binding.
- Baptidzo = immersion. That’s all the word means. People “baptized” pots, pans, dishes … we baptize dogs, sometimes cats or other animals … but the word simply means … to immerse. So can infants be immersed? With care to keep their heads above water, I see no issues. Certainly baths are called for. We have a pool in the back yard. I get immersed, as do my family and friends on a regular basis. It has no special meaning, and it does nothing more than cool us off and provide some entertainment. No reason you can’t have fun with immersion. Some people prefer baths to showers as well. Have at it. Then we have the special cases of baptism in the bible…
- John the Baptist is the most well known baptizer in all of scripture. Jesus, according to scripture, performed no baptisms, although His disciples did. (John 4:2) and no, this is not a contradiction of (John 3:22) but rather 4:2 is a clarification of 3:22. It should be noted that John’s Baptism was a baptism of repentance, and it had no effect if there wasn’t a corresponding change of life that went with it. (Mat. 3:8 and Luke 3:8) In other words, without the repentance (A change of mind that results in a habitual, ongoing change of life in accordance with the changed beliefs (Fruits), John’s baptism did nothing at all.
Jesus commanded that baptism be done. Probably the most detailed verse pertaining to the topic is “Mat 28:19 "Having gone … make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to obey all that I commanded you…” Some important things in this passage are:
- This is a command to ALL of the disciples. It outlines a process that is the very root of what Christians/Disciples are to exist for.
- “Having gone” since you are going. Since no one would be able to stop you … This speaks to internal motivations … unstoppable ones. If you are a disciple whether or not you are going to “go” is not an issue. The wording in Greek implies this is a given, a fact … and the rest is what they, the DISCIPLES, are to focus on “since” they are going.
- “Make Disciples”: Since Jesus was talking TO His disciples, and since the “Disciples were first called Christians in Antioch”, we do have an idea as to what a real Christian is. Look at Jesus disciples in scripture. The disciples were to make … disciples. But that is just the first step. ONCE YOU HAVE MADE A DISCIPLE, that’s the prerequisite, THEN
- Baptize the disciples you have made in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Yes, this is a chain of events… what comes first, what comes second … the second part is that you take the disciples you just made, and you baptize them.
- The third step is to teach the disciples you made, and that you just baptized, everything Jesus commanded them, and to OBEY ALL that He commanded them. This also includes the set of commands this is a part of… making disciples, baptizing disciples, and teaching disciples to obey ALL that He commanded them. In other words, Jesus true disciples DO exactly these things, in this order, today.
Act 16:31 They said, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household." 32 And they spoke the word of the Lord to him together with all who were in his house. 33 And he took them that very hour of the night and washed their wounds, and immediately he was baptized, he and all his household. 34 And he brought them into his house and set food before them, and rejoiced greatly, having believed in God with his whole household.
Nothing new here. Disciples were made as a result of sharing the word, believing … on an individual basis. Everybody in the household believed, ergo everyone was baptized as well. The rules for consistency mean that UNLESS THERE IS NO OTHER POSSIBILITY, we assume everything is 100% consistent. Since there is no indication of young children or infants EVER believing and being baptized, there is also no reason to “create” a doctrine that is contrary to Christ’s own commandment regarding the procedures He Himself gave. The rule is, when there is ANY doubt, assume everything is 100% consistent. As with the case in Acts 16, all the other accounts of “household” baptisms could be EXACTLY as Christ Himself commanded they be done. If they weren’t, and those disciples did not obey Christ and did not teach others to obey Christ, then … they weren’t Christians and their conversions and baptisms are null and void. There is no such thing as a habitually non-following follower of Christ. If you love Me you will … if you don’t you won’t.
Keep in mind that teaching as doctrines the precepts of men makes every bit of worship you can ever do completely worthless, and nullifying the commands of God, including the ones on making disciples, and then baptizing those disciples, and then teaching them to obey ALL God’s commands, including these, to hold fast to your traditions means that your righteousness does not exceed that of the Pharisees and Sadducees. Of course they were a brood of vipers and were sons of their father the Devil. And that means that you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.
I have about 42 pages of notes, including every bible passage with the word baptidzo and all of the passages that relate the gospel and don’t even mention baptism in that gospel. Jesus made conversion, baptism, and learning to obey (3) separate tasks, and the (3) are listed separately from each other in most cases, with a number with belief alone, a few with belief and baptism and a few directed towards the change of life habitual focus of seeking to figure out and obey all that God commands, repent and believe … that results from the saving “belief” process. If anyone is interested in the thorough study, drop me an e-mail.