Mysteries of the Brain

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

... we are at least beginning to grasp the crucial mysteries of neuroscience and starting to make headway in addressing them. Even partial answers to these 10 questions could restructure our understanding of the roughly three-pound mass of gray and white matter that defines who we are.

10 Unsolved Mysteries Of The Brain | DiscoverMagazine.com

That article is ten years old; a lot of progress has been made since then.

 

[Radrook]

Why is my quote function quoting something different to what you typed?

Anyway, I was only joking, hence the

I have no idea. But my quote function is working just fine. First time I use it actually since when I press reply I get the same format. Seems redundant.

 

[Radrook]

There are sometimes similarities in experiences but no evidence they actually experience a common reality.

Unless we define a dream as a reality.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

... But my quote function is working just fine. First time I use it actually since when I press reply I get the same format. Seems redundant.

The 'Post Reply' function only quotes the post you're replying to. The '+ Quote' function allows you to quote from multiple posts.

 

[Radrook]

Thanks for the clarification.

 

[Radrook]

I have yet to see him give any examples. Don't think he starts now.

Examples provided are immediately tagged as unacceptable as examples. So requesting me to provide more is tantamount to requesting that I provide clay ducks for target practice. Numb sayin?

BTW
A more reliable alternative would be to create straw-man arguments and then shoot them down.

 

[Radrook]

Yes, presently. 1,000 years ago there were many more things that were beyond our comprehension, but now we understand them through the discovery of natural processes found in nature.

You aren't trying to make a God of the Gaps argument, are you?

I never attempted to bring God into this thread. That is YOUR idea.

 

[bhsmte]

Examples provided are immediately tagged as unacceptable as examples. So requesting me to provide more is tantamount to requesting that I provide clay ducks for target practice. Numb sayin?

BTW
A more reliable alternative would be to create straw-man arguments and then shoot them down.

Can you provide a post number of when you gave specific examples?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Examples provided are immediately tagged as unacceptable as examples.

Ironically, can you give an example of this happening? ;-)

 

[Radrook]

Ironically, can you give an example of this happening? ;-)

Sure, the info in the video are examples which are immediately rejected. In fact, they aren't even viewed and are rejected anyway. Surely you can't say that you don't see any videos on this forum-right? Ah, but you can say that you don't see them presenting any evidence-right? So that's the best way to go.

 

[bhsmte]

Sure, the info in the video are examples which are immediately rejected. In fact, they aren't even viewed and are rejected anyway. Surely you can't say that you don't see any videos on this forum-right? Ah, but you can say that you don't see them presenting any evidence-right? So that's the best way to go.

What specific information in the video? If you cant explain detail about the own videos you post, why post them?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Sure, the info in the video are examples which are immediately rejected. In fact, they aren't even viewed and are rejected anyway. Surely you can't say that you don't see any videos on this forum-right? Ah, but you can say that you don't see them presenting any evidence-right? So that's the best way to go.

I actually don't spend my time watching 1-hour video's that are said to make some point while the poster is to lazy to summarize said point.

However, you are still free to actually answer my question, without requesting me to go watch some video, which is more then likely filled with the same nonsense I've heared a hundred times before. If you could just summarize it for me, then I can confirm my expectation. And if your summary hints at something that I might not have heared before, I'll surely take the time to watch it at some point.

But until then, why bother?
Just about all ID stuff you've posted here, including the links in your signature, are the same old Discovery Institute PRATT's I've heared hundreds of times before.

I don't expect one of these video's to be any different.

 

[Radrook]

I actually don't spend my time watching 1-hour video's that are said to make some point while the poster is to lazy to summarize said point.

However, you are still free to actually answer my question, without requesting me to go watch some video, which is more then likely filled with the same nonsense I've heared a hundred times before. If you could just summarize it for me, then I can confirm my expectation. And if your summary hints at something that I might not have heared before, I'll surely take the time to watch it at some point.

But until then, why bother?
Just about all ID stuff you've posted here, including the links in your signature, are the same old Discovery Institute PRATT's I've heared hundreds of times before.

I don't expect one of these video's to be any different.

You know, you are probably 100% right about both the video and summary. All the same old pratt.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You know, you are probably 100% right about both the video and summary. All the same old pratt.

I'ld certainly put my money on it.

 

[Radrook]

Back on track with thread topic:

 

[bhsmte]

You know, you are probably 100% right about both the video and summary. All the same old pratt.

Problem is, you can't seem to explain your own video. That is red flag city.

 

[bhsmte]

Back on track with thread topic:

Explain the video.

 

[Radrook]

Explain the video.

Why does a self-explanatory video need explanation? If there was something confusing concerning it or if the those watching it were expected to be below normal intelligence-then it would need one. But neither, I a assuming, is the case.

BTW
How can you be a newbie with approx 43,000 messages?

 

[bhsmte]

Why does a self-explanatory video need explanation? If there was something confusing concerning it or if the those watching it were expected to be below normal intelligence-then it would need one. But neither, I a assuming, is the case.

BTW
How can you be a newbie with approx 43,000 messages?

It is self explanatory, but you can't explain it? Do you expect everyone to interpret it the same?

 

[Radrook]

It is self explanatory, but you can't explain it? Do you expect everyone to interpret it the same?

There is NOTHING to explain when it is self-explanatory. The theme of the thread is clear. The title of the video is in harmony with it. There is no rational reason to claim to be baffled as usual unless bafflement is merely a kneejerk reaction to suspicions of ID propaganda. But bafflement over the video itself? Naaaaahhh!

BTW
This thread isn't about ID propaganda.