klutedavid
Well-Known Member
- Dec 7, 2013
- 9,346
- 4,337
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Hello Marvin.
Thanks for your reply, you wrote the following in your post.
verses in chapter nine and ignoring all the other verses in chapter nine.
You also may need to read these verses (Romans 9:9-11) again and
much more carefully. These three verses do not say what you think
they are saying, Marvin.
11... so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not
because of works but because of Him who calls.
Two phrases stand out here, 'God's purpose' and 'not because of works'.
There is nothing about individual election in this line Marvin.
Paul has been talking about the failure of Israel (law, works), to arrive
at election since chapter two of Romans. So why did Israel (law, works),
fail to acheive election? Israel failed to gain election because Israel
pursued election by works (the law) and not by faith!
11...not because of works but because of Him who calls.
Israel cannot become elect through works (the law), Israel represents
these works. Context, context, Marvin, election results from the call
of God Himself in Christ Jesus, that is the real purpose.
Further, the twins had committed no sin because they had not yet been
born. Esau cannot be condemned Marvin, because Esau has not committed
any sin. Your theology condemns the innocent Marvin, your theology is
unsound and disobeys the context.
Paul is wholly talking about God's purpose and not individual election
in chapter nine. As for the attempted connection of these three verses
to Romans chapter eight. Chapter eight of Romans is for another day.
Thanks for your reply, you wrote the following in your post.
Marvin, surely you can see what you are doing. Your highlighting three1. The whole section (9-11) is about the security of individuals.
Election of nations would not make any contextual sense. Paul has just
told the Roman Christians that nothing could separate them from God’s
love (Rom. 8:31-39).
verses in chapter nine and ignoring all the other verses in chapter nine.
You also may need to read these verses (Romans 9:9-11) again and
much more carefully. These three verses do not say what you think
they are saying, Marvin.
11... so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not
because of works but because of Him who calls.
Two phrases stand out here, 'God's purpose' and 'not because of works'.
There is nothing about individual election in this line Marvin.
Paul has been talking about the failure of Israel (law, works), to arrive
at election since chapter two of Romans. So why did Israel (law, works),
fail to acheive election? Israel failed to gain election because Israel
pursued election by works (the law) and not by faith!
11...not because of works but because of Him who calls.
Israel cannot become elect through works (the law), Israel represents
these works. Context, context, Marvin, election results from the call
of God Himself in Christ Jesus, that is the real purpose.
Further, the twins had committed no sin because they had not yet been
born. Esau cannot be condemned Marvin, because Esau has not committed
any sin. Your theology condemns the innocent Marvin, your theology is
unsound and disobeys the context.
Paul is wholly talking about God's purpose and not individual election
in chapter nine. As for the attempted connection of these three verses
to Romans chapter eight. Chapter eight of Romans is for another day.
Upvote
0