• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

We are all looking at the same evidence - really?

In situ

in vivo veritas
May 20, 2013
1,754
324
Amsterdam
✟30,712.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
It's not my fault they can't think beyond there pre-conceived beliefs and falsify their own beliefs with their own conclusions.


Oh man..... I cant stop laughing! All this projection of your own fault onto others are hilarious! You got to do this as a stand up comedian !
 
Upvote 0

In situ

in vivo veritas
May 20, 2013
1,754
324
Amsterdam
✟30,712.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I don't believe we are looking at the same data because you keep ignoring 6,000 years of observational and proven data.

Data this or data that.. What about facts? You know that kind of data that has gone through a quality control?
 
Upvote 0

RLBeers

Active Member
Aug 23, 2015
65
37
74
✟22,892.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I find the whole creation/evolution argument to be a waste of time. If you choose to accept Darwin as the prophet of your godless existence, go ahead. It is, quite literally no skin off my nose. As for the accusations that those who choose to believe in a creator must be dim-witted, I direct you to men such as Tolkien, CS Lewis and several members of NASA, as well as myself with a recorded IQ of 168. There is no conflict in believing in a creator and still finding the foundational structure of the universe fascinating while disputing there is any proof humans came from primordial globs of protoplasmic goo. The real question is, will you die and go to heaven, or not? If you refuse to accept the fact of Jesus as Lord and Savior, probably not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mickiio
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I find the whole creation/evolution argument to be a waste of time. If you choose to accept Darwin as the prophet of your godless existence, go ahead.

Who accepts Darwin as a prophet?

As for the accusations that those who choose to believe in a creator must be dim-witted, I direct you to men such as Tolkien, CS Lewis and several members of NASA, as well as myself with a recorded IQ of 168. There is no conflict in believing in a creator and still finding the foundational structure of the universe fascinating while disputing there is any proof humans came from primordial globs of protoplasmic goo. The real question is, will you die and go to heaven, or not? If you refuse to accept the fact of Jesus as Lord and Savior, probably not.

We are accusing you of ignoring the evidence in order to protect your religious beliefs. We will gladly agree that smart people can be a victim of this as easily as dumb people.
 
Upvote 0

In situ

in vivo veritas
May 20, 2013
1,754
324
Amsterdam
✟30,712.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I don't believe we are looking at the same data

No we are not, and you should start to look at the facts instead of your "data".

Do you know what a therapsid and a cynodont is? If you don't, start check it out so you don't miss any "data".

Therapsids are mammal like reptiles that runs around on four legs in the same fashion mammals does. Cynodonts are fluffy therapsids with whiskers like mammalians. But hey! They all lay egg eggs! Cynodonts are confusing alike mammals, but they are not mammals. Cynodonts are fluffy reptiles with whiskers!


To make it easy for a creationist to understand what I am talking about I have created this pedagogic illustration:

therapsid-cats-to-cynodonts-cats.png


Cynodonts are micro evolved therapsids.... And before you object, to the picture, yes mammals are - per definition - both therapsids and cynodonts. Because mammals are micorevolved cynodonts.

That is basically all you need to know about therapsids vs cynodonts vs mammals for now. Becasue my point is; did you know kittens are cynodonts? Do you know that all mammals are cynodonts? Did you know this "data"?

If not, how much else do you not know?

because you keep ignoring 6,000 years of observational and proven data.

I guess you mean the bible, sorry, your science book. [I am trying really hard to keep a straight face now]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Infraspecific taxa don't exist. They are something you made up.

What you call Asians are direct descendants of Africans. Africans became Asians. Africans didn't do this by mating with a third population. They directly became Asians.

And yet you can name nothing else that did this except in your Fairie Dust. What you call Chinook are direct descendants of Husky and Mastiff. The Husky and Mastiff did not become Chinook. The Husky still remains a Husky - the Mastiff a Mastiff.

When an Asian mates with an African there is change - until then the Asian will always remain Asian - the African African. Just stop ignoring the observational evidence and pretend it happened any other way in the past.

I will ask again: Show me one Husky, Asian, African, Bottle-nosed dolphin, finch, or _____________________ (insert name of animal or race) that changed without mating with another infraspecific taxa within it's same species.

I hear you all make claims about the past - yet you can't even get it right in the here and now.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
And yet you can name nothing else that did this except in your Fairie Dust.

Chimps and humans share a common ancestor. That's your second example.

When an Asian mates with an African there is change - until then the Asian will always remain Asian - the African African. Just stop ignoring the observational evidence and pretend it happened any other way in the past.

Asians are directly descended from Africans.
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,352
Winnipeg
✟251,568.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Care to name one(1) straw man instead of making general sweeping statements?

Seriously? You use the infographic you do and then imply that I'm the one making "general sweeping statements"? Pot calling the kettle black, I think. Your entire infographic was a Strawman. Every part of it was a cartoonish representation of the Christian's perspective.

Selah.
 
Upvote 0

ecco

Poster
Sep 4, 2015
2,011
544
Florida
✟5,011.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I find the whole creation/evolution argument to be a waste of time. If you choose to accept Darwin as the prophet of your godless existence, go ahead. It is, quite literally no skin off my nose. As for the accusations that those who choose to believe in a creator must be dim-witted, I direct you to men such as Tolkien, CS Lewis and several members of NASA, as well as myself with a recorded IQ of 168. There is no conflict in believing in a creator and still finding the foundational structure of the universe fascinating while disputing there is any proof humans came from primordial globs of protoplasmic goo. The real question is, will you die and go to heaven, or not? If you refuse to accept the fact of Jesus as Lord and Savior, probably not.

People who do not believe in evolution believe that way because they take a fundamentalist reading of genesis rather than an allegorical reading.

High IQ has nothing to do with belief. Belief usually comes from indoctrination into religion from a very early age. Sometimes it comes about from a traumatic event in a person's life. It seldom, if ever, comes about as the result an honest study of the reality of man and nature.

For what it's worth, I became an atheist long before I ever heard of Darwin.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
People who do not believe in evolution believe that way because they take a fundamentalist reading of genesis rather than an allegorical reading.

I believe in evolution, but I don't believe in evolution. The reason I believe in evolution is because of the scientific method. The reason I don't believe in evolution is because of the scientific method.

There's evolution and then there's evolution.

High IQ has nothing to do with belief. Belief usually comes from indoctrination into religion from a very early age. Sometimes it comes about from a traumatic event in a person's life. It seldom, if ever, comes about as the result an honest study of the reality of man and nature.

That's quite a wide sweep of the brush with a healthy dose of self righteousness. You sound like a religious person.

For what it's worth, I became an atheist long before I ever heard of Darwin.

For what it's worth, I became a Christian because of personal interaction with Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mickiio
Upvote 0

ecco

Poster
Sep 4, 2015
2,011
544
Florida
✟5,011.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I believe in evolution, but I don't believe in evolution. The reason I believe in evolution is because of the scientific method. The reason I don't believe in evolution is because of the scientific method.

The reason you do not believe in evolution, as defined by science, not as defined by you, is that you take a literal reading of genesis. For some reason you are hesitant to admit that.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The reason you do not believe in evolution, as defined by science, not as defined by you, is that you take a literal reading of genesis. For some reason you are hesitant to admit that.

I do believe in evolution. I just don't believe in evolution.
 
Upvote 0

ecco

Poster
Sep 4, 2015
2,011
544
Florida
✟5,011.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I do believe in evolution. I just don't believe in evolution.
Notice I said "evolution, as defined by science, not as defined by you,"
Notice you ignored " you take a literal reading of genesis. For some reason you are hesitant to admit that."
 
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
SkyWriting earlier:
The same goes in court.

So, if you don't like the evidence, you disregard it.


When selecting a jury, the prosecution and the defense ask prospective jurors questions to ascertain if there are any biases.

If, during this process you were asked "Would you disregard evidence just because you didn't like it" and you replied "Yes" do you think you would be qualified to sit on the jury?
there is one other very important point about this that isn't being said.
and that is "a jury of peers"
laymen can hardly be called "peers" in scientific matters.
 
Upvote 0

ecco

Poster
Sep 4, 2015
2,011
544
Florida
✟5,011.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
there is one other very important point about this that isn't being said.
and that is "a jury of peers"
laymen can hardly be called "peers" in scientific matters.


Nice try at a stretch.

It is more correct to...
  • Equate jury with people
  • Equate scientists with lawyers and expert witnesses

If you expect jurors to understand the concepts put forward by lawyers and expert witnesses then you should expect people to understand the concepts put forward by scientists.

In neither case...if you don't like the evidence, you disregard it.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Notice I said "evolution, as defined by science, not as defined by you,"
Notice you ignored " you take a literal reading of genesis. For some reason you are hesitant to admit that."

Notice, I said I believe in evolution but I don't believe in evolution. Now, as far as "evolution as defined by science", why not actually define it within parameters? "Evolution as defined by science" is vague.

You seem to be placing your faith in the unseen realm of Darwinist evolution.
 
Upvote 0

Jimmy D

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2014
5,147
5,995
✟277,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
And yet you can name nothing else that did this except in your Fairie Dust. What you call Chinook are direct descendants of Husky and Mastiff. The Husky and Mastiff did not become Chinook. The Husky still remains a Husky - the Mastiff a Mastiff.

When an Asian mates with an African there is change - until then the Asian will always remain Asian - the African African. Just stop ignoring the observational evidence and pretend it happened any other way in the past.

I'm sorry if I missed it, but I don't understand where you believe these variations came from in the first place. If these Asians always remain Asians where did the first ones come from?
 
Upvote 0