OzSpen
Regular Member
- Oct 15, 2005
- 11,553
- 709
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Private
You mean because the words aren't found there?
One does not have to find the exact words there to be able to affirm the inerrancy of Scripture, just as one does not have to see the exact word, Trinity, to affirm the doctrine of the Trinity.
I note that you ignored commenting on the rest of my post which was: 'See my article, The Bible’s support for inerrancy of the originals. This is only a starter for evidence'. You don't seem to want to deal with the biblical evidence in support of inerrancy. Seems as though it is pointless continuing a discussion when you filter the evidence I write.
See 'Proof inerrancy is historical/biblical'.
I doubt if he saw it as 'encouraging.' It was not that long of a paragraph to begin with.
Have you checked with him and what was his response? Or are you simply guessing?
Upvote
0