I am Non Denominational and unorthodox

[Semyamara]

I believe in the statement of faith of most regular churches. There are few things i would interpret a little better, but basically I go by the statement of faith and that Jesus is the son of God and God in the flesh, we must be saved by Christ and born again.
Outside of that I have been in a lot of disputes and mind wrestling over issues that don't have to do with salvation.
I am a watcher, an Anunnaki and so many Christians just say they are fallen angels and evil dragons.
I have the family history to know this is true and I know God gives us a mission on earth. In the end we are part angel blood and dna. Some went astray and followed satans ways but others went underground and followed Lord Jesus.
I have talked to people online a lots and some in the real world. If they are following other religions i have a gift to see how Jesus or some teaching of Jesus is in their religion and i tell them about Jesus using the comparisons.
I was called a freak in school and my parents almost committed me to a mental institution. I listened to the angels, or aliens and followed their advice, and everything worked out.
I figured if there are any hybrids here they would be in non denominational if they believe in Christ and were born again. I know a lot of the family gravitates towards new age or cult religion and that isn't good. God calls them through Jesus Christ to be saved and go on their mission.
If you do web searches about watchers and Anunnaki all you find is evil dragons, satanic bloodlines, illuminatis, and basically everything evil, new world order and antichrist. What about us who follow the Lord Jesus and the families of Anunnaki who didn't fall for the temptations offered to our ancestors?
The watchers were sent here for a reason and a purpose to watch over the humans. that was like a program instilled in them from that time. I know some forgot it or neglected it, but that original order from God is still programmed into the minds and the dna genetics of every single one of the watchers children and their children and so on.

 

[Kutte]

I believe in the statement of faith of most regular churches. There are few things i would interpret a little better, but basically I go by the statement of faith and that Jesus is the son of God and God in the flesh, we must be saved by Christ and born again.
Outside of that I have been in a lot of disputes and mind wrestling over issues that don't have to do with salvation.
I am a watcher, an Anunnaki and so many Christians just say they are fallen angels and evil dragons.
I have the family history to know this is true and I know God gives us a mission on earth. In the end we are part angel blood and dna. Some went astray and followed satans ways but others went underground and followed Lord Jesus.
I have talked to people online a lots and some in the real world. If they are following other religions i have a gift to see how Jesus or some teaching of Jesus is in their religion and i tell them about Jesus using the comparisons.
I was called a freak in school and my parents almost committed me to a mental institution. I listened to the angels, or aliens and followed their advice, and everything worked out.
I figured if there are any hybrids here they would be in non denominational if they believe in Christ and were born again. I know a lot of the family gravitates towards new age or cult religion and that isn't good. God calls them through Jesus Christ to be saved and go on their mission.
If you do web searches about watchers and Anunnaki all you find is evil dragons, satanic bloodlines, illuminatis, and basically everything evil, new world order and antichrist. What about us who follow the Lord Jesus and the families of Anunnaki who didn't fall for the temptations offered to our ancestors?
The watchers were sent here for a reason and a purpose to watch over the humans. that was like a program instilled in them from that time. I know some forgot it or neglected it, but that original order from God is still programmed into the minds and the dna genetics of every single one of the watchers children and their children and so on.

Hi Semyamara,

If you believe that Jesus is the son of God and God in the flesh (At the same time? How can this be?) and must be saved by Christ and (be) born again, this makes you a fundamental Christian.

My best, Kutte

 

[joshuanazar]

What does the Bible say about all of this?

 

[Semyamara]

Hi Semyamara,

If you believe that Jesus is the son of God and God in the flesh (At the same time? How can this be?) and must be saved by Christ and (be) born again, this makes you a fundamental Christian.

My best, Kutte

I don't think fundamentalist Christians would accept me in their church once we started to talk.

 

[Semyamara]

What does the Bible say about all of this?

It says the sons of God married the daughters of men and had children. It says to entertain strangers because you might be entertaining angels unawares. It doesn't just mean angels that are here then gone like a spirit, it means angels that are in the flesh because they are the children of the watchers.

 

[joshuanazar]

;

It says the sons of God married the daughters of men and had children. It says to entertain strangers because you might be entertaining angels unawares. It doesn't just mean angels that are here then gone like a spirit, it means angels that are in the flesh because they are the children of the watchers.

But didn't all those children of angels and women die? Like in the flood and then when David killed the last of them? And can you verify with scripture that the angels we might entertain can also be angels with flesh and blood bodies?

 

[Semyamara]

;

But didn't all those children of angels and women die? Like in the flood and then when David killed the last of them? And can you verify with scripture that the angels we might entertain can also be angels with flesh and blood bodies?

The ones born before the flood died. It says they also took wives after that. The corrupted ones who were giants like Goliath were killed, but not all of them were giants or corrupted. The Bible says angels ate food with people, so yes, they can take on flesh and blood bodies. That's in Genesis 19 when two angels come to Lots house and Lot makes food for them that they eat. There are different kind of angels because another verse says they are ministering spirits, and you have that verse about entertaining strangers because they could be angels. That one would be talking about the flesh and blood kind of angel. There are other kinds of angels that are very powerful and make people fall down on the ground like the angel that visited Daniel

 

[dragongunner]

Angels can take on the form of flesh, and then be gone. They do not marry either in the scriptures. The "sons" of God married the daughters of men are not angels. They are descendents of men that believed in God married to decedents of men that had left God.

The evidence offered to argue that these beings were fallen angels is primarily based on the grammar of the phrase "sons of God." In the Old Testament, "sons of God" elsewhere refers to angels (Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7). While this offers evidence for the "sons of God" as fallen angels, there are two main problems with this theory. First, Matthew 22:30 notes that angels do not marry. Those who argue for this position realize this but suggest Genesis 6 is different since these would be fallen angels and that Matthew 22:30 refers to marriage in heaven. Second, and a more important concern, is that just because other places in the Bible use "sons of God" to refer to angels does not require that the same usage is necessary here. The larger context must also be taken into account, a context that seems to suggest sin taking place among humans, not angels.

 

[muddleglum]

I believe in the statement of faith of most regular churches. There are few things i would interpret a little better, but basically I go by the statement of faith and that Jesus is the son of God and God in the flesh, we must be saved by Christ and born again.
Outside of that I have been in a lot of disputes and mind wrestling over issues that don't have to do with salvation.

Use Romans 14 a lot. Use it on yourself, too.

 

[Job8]

It says the sons of God married the daughters of men and had children. It says to entertain strangers because you might be entertaining angels unawares. It doesn't just mean angels that are here then gone like a spirit, it means angels that are in the flesh because they are the children of the watchers.

One can either be an angel or a human being. You cannot be both, so you need to sort this out in yor own mind.

As for those offspring of evil angels during the time of Noah, they contributed to more and more evil in the world. So you need to think about this very carefully. There is no redemption for evil angels, and the holy angels do not need redemption.

 

[joshuanazar]

The ones born before the flood died. It says they also took wives after that. The corrupted ones who were giants like Goliath were killed, but not all of them were giants or corrupted. The Bible says angels ate food with people, so yes, they can take on flesh and blood bodies. That's in Genesis 19 when two angels come to Lots house and Lot makes food for them that they eat. There are different kind of angels because another verse says they are ministering spirits, and you have that verse about entertaining strangers because they could be angels. That one would be talking about the flesh and blood kind of angel. There are other kinds of angels that are very powerful and make people fall down on the ground like the angel that visited Daniel

I believe that fallen angels once had children with mankind. But I want scripture that says plainly that there are still offspring of these people. And just because an angel is a spirit doesn't make them any less physical. After all, they had to be physical to mate on the first place. Jesus ate after he rose from the dead, but he was only flesh and bone. He had no blood. Same with angels. But my question is what makes you think you are one of these watchers? From what I hear your parents weren't very supportive. What evidence do you have that you are part angel.

 

[Sketcher]

Angels aren't physical beings that can copulate with humans. They are ministering spirits (Hebrews 1:14) or in the case of the fallen ones, tempting and oppressing spirits.

 

[joshuanazar]

Angels aren't physical beings that can copulate with humans. They are ministering spirits (Hebrews 1:14) or in the case of the fallen ones, tempting and oppressing spirits.

We know that angels are physical cause Jesus said that we will be like them and since we will have a physical body like Jesus then they must have a physical body too. Also how can they interact with each other and other stuff if they were not physical? Revelation says how Satan will be bound by a chain. Now even though angel bodies and human bodies are both physical, they are not made of the same substance. Human bodies are natural, while angelic bodies are supernatural.

 

[Job8]

Angels aren't physical beings that can copulate with humans. They are ministering spirits (Hebrews 1:14) or in the case of the fallen ones, tempting and oppressing spirits.

Though you may find it hard to believe, evil angels in Noah's day took human form (which they are capable to doing), copulated with women, and produced unusual and gigantic offspring. Study the circumstances which led to the Flood.

Holy angels are indeed ministering spirits, but there is a vast array of evil angels which exist to this day. Those who sinned with women during Noah's time are chained in Tartarus, but a multitude of them are still free and occupy the atmosphere and stratosphere. Some assume demonic aspects, others appear as "ghosts", while still others deceptively appear as "angels of light". The "gods" of all the false religions are indeed the demonic angels.

 

[Kutte]

Though you may find it hard to believe, evil angels in Noah's day took human form (which they are capable to doing), copulated with women, and produced unusual and gigantic offspring. Study the circumstances which led to the Flood.

Holy angels are indeed ministering spirits, but there is a vast array of evil angels which exist to this day. Those who sinned with women during Noah's time are chained in Tartarus, but a multitude of them are still free and occupy the atmosphere and stratosphere. Some assume demonic aspects, others appear as "ghosts", while still others deceptively appear as "angels of light". The "gods" of all the false religions are indeed the demonic angels.

Job8

We seem to have a big problem with all those evil angels around. As a simple human being I feel not being able to match their spiritual powers and protect myself.

Kutte

 

[dragongunner]

Well I tried. Amazing the stuff that the Bible does not say that people believe in.

 

[Cappadocious]

The notion that the Annunaki were anything but Sumerian gods can be traced to Zecharia Sitchin, a discredited pseudo-scholar. You have good reason not to believe that the Annunaki have anything to do with angels.

 

[Sketcher]

Though you may find it hard to believe, evil angels in Noah's day took human form (which they are capable to doing), copulated with women, and produced unusual and gigantic offspring. Study the circumstances which led to the Flood.

Holy angels are indeed ministering spirits, but there is a vast array of evil angels which exist to this day. Those who sinned with women during Noah's time are chained in Tartarus, but a multitude of them are still free and occupy the atmosphere and stratosphere. Some assume demonic aspects, others appear as "ghosts", while still others deceptively appear as "angels of light". The "gods" of all the false religions are indeed the demonic angels.

They did not. If you believe they did, you are misinterpreting the passage. The sons of God were good men. The daughters of men were wicked women from wicked families, and they corrupted the good men who married them.

 

[joshuanazar]

They did not. If you believe they did, you are misinterpreting the passage. The sons of God were good men. The daughters of men were wicked women from wicked families, and they corrupted the good men who married them.

There is a problem with what you said. Mainly Noah was the only good man alive at this time. So when all of the families were wicked save one man, where did the good families come from? We have to look at that verse in the context of the entire bible. Every single time the bible mentions Sons of God in the old testament it is referring to angels. Man is only referred to as sons of God when we do not have a corrupt nature. Obviously, man had a corrupt nature right before the flood so Sons of God couldn't be man. I know some Christians have come to believe the traditions that their church tries to pass off as God's Word, but give the the scripture where it says that the sons of God were good men while the daughters of men were evil. I can tell you that the Jewish people were serious regarding claims of being God's sons, hence them wanting to stone Jesus when he said it.

 

[joshuanazar]

Sorry if that last post seemed harsh. It was not my intention.