Is the Church Raptured in Revelation 4

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟40,528.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
BABerean, thanks for the info you provided in response to my challenge. Silence from the other point of view is deafening, which says a lot.

Originally Posted by duolos on the Dispy forum, Berkhoof Thread:
Oh you mean like Eph 2:11-13 where Paul says that the Church is the citizens of Israel? End Quote

Answer:

No - like Eph. 2:11-13, where Paul says all that after Israel's commonwealth was headed for 70AD.

How is it that Paul relates Israel's status then, to those with eyes to see - oh, yeah, "them that WERE nigh."

Problem is , most think the issue is peoples, and salvation. It is neither.

Its about a planned solving in advance, for two falls, in two different realms set in motion by the words "I will be like the Most High," Is. 14:14.

It is about Prophecy [Fallen Earth, Rm. 5:12] and Mystery [Fallen High Places, Eph. 6:12].

It is about a Two-Fold Plan and Purpose as to solving for that, Eph. 1:10; 3:15.

Deal with this Scripture with Scripture, not Scripture with books about, including Berkhoff, Stam, or whomever where their assertions do not fit that.
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
iamlamad said in post 68:

What has been taught is that we will not have to go through any of God's wrath poured out on the earth.

Note that nothing requires (as is sometimes claimed) that the entire future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 will be God's wrath, or that any part of the tribulation that will be his wrath will be directed against any of the saved people (1 Thessalonians 5:9) who will still be alive on the earth at that time (Matthew 24:9-13, Revelation 13:7-10, Revelation 14:12-13, Revelation 20:4-6). Most of the tribulation could be only Satan's wrath working through evil people and natural forces to bring disaster on the earth, like when Satan was allowed to work through evil people and natural forces to bring disaster on righteous Job (Job 1:12-20), against whom God had no wrath.

The tribulation's first 5 seals (Revelation 6:1-11) won't be God's wrath or judgment, for after the first 4 seals, the martyrs of the 5th seal ask God when he is going to bring his judgment against the world (Revelation 6:10). And the killing of even more martyrs, which the 5th seal foretells will happen sometime after the 5th seal (Revelation 6:11), won't be God's wrath against those martyrs. So Jesus' unsealing of the seals (Revelation 6), the tribulation's first stage, doesn't mean the events unsealed will be God's wrath, but that they will be permitted by God to happen at that time.

The tribulation's 6th seal (Revelation 6:12-14) will happen sometime before the day of the Lord (Joel 2:31, Revelation 6:12), as in only a few years before. The day of the Lord itself won't begin until Jesus' 2nd coming (1 Corinthians 1:7-8; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8; 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10), which won't happen until Revelation 19:7 to 20:6, immediately after the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 (Matthew 24:29-31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8). Similarly, the day of the Lord's wrath (Psalms 110:5) won't begin until Jesus' 2nd coming (Revelation 19:19-21).

So the people quoted at the 6th seal (Revelation 6:17), during only the first stage of the tribulation, could be just as mistaken as Job was when Job said that what was happening to him was God's wrath against him (Job 19:11). Just as what was happening to Job was actually Satan's wrath against him, not God's wrath, so the 6th seal could actually be Satan's wrath, not God's wrath. And just as the writer of the book of Job didn't go out of his way to correct Job's mistaken statement in Job 19:11, and just as the apostles John and Matthew didn't go out of their way to correct the mistaken statements of the people they quoted in John 7:12b and Matthew 27:63a, so the apostle John could have not gone out of his way to correct the statement of the people he quoted in Revelation 6:17.

After the tribulation's 6th seal will occur its 7th seal (Revelation 8:1), out of which will come its 7 trumpets (Revelation 8:1-2). Note that nothing requires that any of the first 6 trumpets' events in Revelation chapters 8 and 9 will be God's wrath. The 5th trumpet's events will be the work of strange locust-like beings from the bottomless pit (Revelation 9:2-10), led by a fallen angel from the bottomless pit (Revelation 9:11). And the 6th trumpet's events to the end of Revelation 9 will be the work of weird horse-like beings led by 4 fallen angels previously bound at the Euphrates (Revelation 9:14-19). So even though good angels of God will sound the first 6 trumpets, this could be announcing God's allowing the wrath of Satan to destroy 1/3 of different things (Revelation 8:7-12, Revelation 9:15,18), just as Satan will subsequently, mid-tribulation, be allowed by God to cause 1/3 of the angels (i.e. his fallen angels) to be cast down to the earth permanently (Revelation 12:4,9).

Revelation chapters 8 and 9 will happen before the Antichrist's (the individual-man aspect of the beast's) future, literal 3.5-year worldwide Luciferian/Satanic reign (Revelation 13:4-18, Revelation 12:9). And the events in Revelation chapters 8 and 9 could be used by Satan to help prepare the world to welcome that reign. For what he could do is first take great pleasure in causing the destruction in each event, but then claim that the destruction isn't from him, but from YHWH, and that YHWH is a cruel tyrant god who hates mankind and only wants to make it suffer, while he (Satan, as "Lucifer") only wants the best for mankind (cf. Mark 8:33b). In this way, he could deceive the world into turning away from YHWH and instead worshipping him (the dragon) and the Antichrist (Revelation 13:4-18, Revelation 12:9). The Antichrist will utterly revile YHWH (Revelation 13:6, Daniel 11:36).

After the Antichrist's literal 3.5-year reign (Revelation 13:5-7) is declared legally over at the sounding of the tribulation's 7th trumpet (Revelation 11:15), the 7 plagues of the 7 vials of God's wrath will come out of the heavenly-temple opening of the 7th trumpet (Revelation 11:19, Revelation 15:5 to 16:1). The vials will then be poured out on the Antichrist's followers as God's judgment for their receiving the Antichrist's mark and worshipping his image (Revelation 16:2), and for their killing of people in the church (Revelation 16:6-7, Revelation 13:7-10, Revelation 14:12-13, Revelation 20:4-6, Matthew 24:9-13).

During the Antichrist's worldwide reign, people in the church will be hated and killed in every nation for refusing to renounce the name of Jesus Christ (Matthew 24:9-13). They will be beheaded for refusing to renounce the witness of Jesus Christ (Revelation 20:4), for refusing to accept the antichrist lies that Jesus himself isn't the Christ (1 John 2:22), and that Christ himself isn't in the flesh (2 John 1:7). They will be beheaded for refusing to renounce the sound doctrine of the Bible, the Word of God (Revelation 20:4; 2 Timothy 3:15 to 4:4), for refusing to depart from the Biblical faith and to give heed instead to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils (1 Timothy 4:1-2). They will be beheaded for refusing to worship the Antichrist's image (Revelation 20:4, Revelation 13:15). And all of this will be Satan's wrath against the church (Revelation 12:17), not God's wrath, for the church isn't appointed to God's wrath (1 Thessalonians 5:9).

Even when God's wrath comes in the 7 vials (Revelation 16), the tribulation's final stage, because the church isn't appointed to God's wrath (1 Thessalonians 5:9), none of the vials will be directed at any of those in the church who will still be alive on the earth at that time, still waiting for Jesus' coming as a thief (Revelation 16:15). Instead, they will go into protective chambers which they will have prepared for themselves on the earth (Isaiah 26:20), just as Noah and his family went into the protective ark which they had prepared for themselves on the earth (Genesis 7:11,13).

Jesus will return right after the 7th-and-last vial is completed (Revelation 16:17,19, Revelation 19:2-21, Matthew 24:29-30), and he will bring the 2nd-coming wrath of God on the unsaved world (Revelation 19:15-21). But before that 2nd-coming wrath begins, the church will be caught up together/gathered together (raptured) (1 Thessalonians 4:17; 2 Thessalonians 2:1, Matthew 24:31) into the sky to hold a meeting in the air with the returned Jesus (1 Thessalonians 4:17).
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
iamlamad said in post 68:

They have never understood that the seals are a part of the church age . . .

Note that there is no such thing as the church age, for the church will continue in the world throughout all ages (Ephesians 3:21, John 17:15). For just as the church will continue in the world throughout the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 (Matthew 24:9-13, Revelation 13:7-10, Revelation 14:12-13, Revelation 20:4-6), and then throughout the subsequent millennium (Revelation 20:4-6, Revelation 5:10, Revelation 2:26-29), so the church will then continue forever on the new earth (Revelation 21:1 to 22:5).

iamlamad said in post 68:

. . . the first seal to represent the CHURCH sent out to make disciples of all nations . . .

Regarding the 1st seal's horseman, on the white horse (Revelation 6:1-2), that could represent the gospel of Jesus (not Jesus physically: Acts 3:21) going forth to all nations and victoriously saving souls. For Jesus is the rider on the white horse seen later in Revelation 19:11,13 (cf. John 1:1,14), and his gospel will be preached to all nations during the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 (Matthew 24:14, Revelation 14:6). The bow (Revelation 6:2) is a weapon that is able to affect things far away, just as the gospel is able to affect things far away from where it began (Luke 24:47).

iamlamad said in post 68:

. . . then the Red horse, the Black horse, and the Pale horse riding together to represent the devil's attempt to prevent the spread of the gospel to all nations.

The last 3 of the 4 horsemen (Revelation 6:4-8) represent a horrible future war which will begin the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24, and which war will, with its aftermath of famines and epidemics, end up killing 1/4 of the world (Revelation 6:8). The "great sword" of this war (Revelation 6:4) could be Israel's nuclear weapons.

One way this war could happen is the U.S. could undertake a massive buildup of the Iraqi Army, initially to prevent the Islamic State militant group (also known as ISIS, or ISIL) from taking over Iraq, and Syria, and all the rest of the Middle East, and eventually so that the Iraqi Army can serve as a proxy army, for the U.S. and Israel, for an all-out ground invasion of Iran, in order to end Iran's nuclear weapons program and extremist regime. As part of the buildup of the Iraqi Army, the U.S. could reinstall much of the former Iraqi Baathist military hierarchy (i.e. that which existed under Baathist Saddam Hussein), to run the present Iraqi Army more efficiently and ruthlessly.

And if the current, Shiite-dominated government of Iraq balks at any return of a Baathist-dominated military (which cruelly suppressed the Iraqi Shiites under Saddam Hussein's rule), or balks at any invasion of fellow-Shiite Iran, this could lead the CIA, MI6, and the Mossad to bring about a Baathist coup d'etat in Iraq. For they could see a well-run, Baathist Iraqi Army and government as the only way to keep ISIS/ISIL under control, and the only way to eventually invade and defeat Iran, which invasion the Iraqi Baathists could agree to perform, for they see meddling, non-Arab Iran as a great enemy of Arab autonomy.

To help get the Iraqi masses and the world behind the idea of an all-out Iraqi invasion of Iran, "false flag" operations could be managed by the CIA, MI6, and the Mossad by which it will be made to seem that (non-Arab, Persian) Iran is attacking the Iraqi Sunni Arabs and their little children terroristically with "dirty bombs" made from Iranian-enriched uranium, so that the Iraqi Arab masses will become enraged and begin to call for all-out retaliation against (what they could call) "the vile Persians". And the world could see an Iraqi invasion of Iran as being completely justified by self-defense.

But then, right when Iraq is all ready to invade Iran, the ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel (who by that time could be led by a great miracle-working false Messiah: cf. Matthew 24:24) could completely destroy the Muslim Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque (the 3rd-holiest sites in Islam) on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, to clear the site for the building of a 3rd Jewish temple (Revelation 11:1-2, Matthew 24:15, Daniel 11:31,36; 2 Thessalonians 2:4). This could so enrage Muslims worldwide, including the (Muslim) Iraqi Army, that the Iraqi Baathist Generals could see it as a perfect excuse to abandon the plan to invade huge Iran, and instead (pretending that they are doing so in the name of Islam) turn and send their vast army against the little territory of Israel, completely defeating and occupying it (Daniel 11:15-17; in verse 17, the original Hebrew word translated as "daughter" is "bath").

But this wouldn't be the ultimate reason for the Baathist attack, which could continue on south to also defeat and occupy Egypt (Daniel 11:15). For Egypt is ruled by the U.S.-supported Egyptian Army, which the Baathists could see as being a puppet of the U.S., just as they could see Israel as being a colony of the U.S. Baathism's ultimate aim is to unite all Arab lands from Oman to Morocco into one massive, powerful United Arab States free of all foreign hegemony.

The all-out Iraqi attack on Israel could be joined by the entire (Baathist) Syrian Army (with all of its missiles, many still secretly tipped with nerve agents), as well as by all of Iran's long-range missiles and all of Hezbollah's and Hamas' missiles and guerrillas. Israel could find itself suddenly attacked from 3 directions at the same time, with tens of thousands of missiles raining down on its cities and military bases, and tens of thousands of Iraqi tanks (meant to defeat and occupy huge Iran) pouring across its borders. As Israel starts to see its little sliver of land completely overrun, and sees that its total defeat and occupation is imminent and assured, in retaliation it could drop nuclear bombs on Baghdad, Damascus (Isaiah 17:1), Tehran, and other major cities of Iraq, Syria, and Iran.

There could be so many nuclear explosions sending so much radioactive dust and ash so high into the atmosphere that it could be blown eastward and fall on hugely-populated South Asia, ruining so many crop fields and immune systems there with radiation that 1/4 of the world's population could end up dying from the war and its aftermath of famines and epidemics. This could fulfill the horrible war which will begin the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24, which war will, with its aftermath of famines and epidemics, end up killing 1/4 of the world (Revelation 6:4-8). The "great sword" of this war (Revelation 6:4) could be Israel's nuclear weapons. This war could be blamed not only on the religious fundamentalism of Islam and Judaism, but also on religious fundamentalism in general, and so could lead to a worldwide crusade against all forms of religious fundamentalism, including Christian fundamentalism, i.e. the (correct) idea that the Bible is wholly true (2 Timothy 3:16, Matthew 4:4) and that all other religions are cursed (Galatians 1:8-9, John 14:6, John 3:36, Acts 4:12).

After an Iraqi Baathist General who could lead the defeat and occupation of Israel and Egypt mysteriously disappears from the scene (Daniel 11:19), the Antichrist, who could be an Arab, could arise peacefully out of Lebanon (from the modern city of Tyre: Ezekiel 28:2; cf. 2 Thessalonians 2:4), and he could take up the mantle of Baathism and vow to (in his words) "complete the great work of Arab liberation and unification". The first thing that the Antichrist could do once he is given control (Daniel 11:21) of a Baathist federation of Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and a "United Palestine" (i.e. a defeated and occupied Israel), is to perform a small and localized attack against an army of ultra-Orthodox Jews holed up in the walled Old City of Jerusalem and led by an ultra-Orthodox Jewish false Messiah (Daniel 9:26a, Daniel 11:22).

These ultra-Orthodox Jews could have managed to hold off the first Baathist attack even as it overran the rest of Israel, because the walled Old City of Jerusalem is considered holy to the Muslims, and so it is not to be bombarded or destroyed. The Antichrist could manage in some way to take the Old City without doing it much harm (such as by incapacitating its Jewish defenders with huge clouds of tear gas while tens of thousands of Arab soldiers wearing gas masks take control of the city by climbing over its walls on thousands of tall ladders).

But then, instead of imprisoning or executing all of the ultra-Orthodox Jews and their false Messiah, the Antichrist will do an amazing thing. He will "cut" a peace treaty with them and their false Messiah (Daniel 9:26a, Daniel 11:23), permitting them to keep a 3rd Jewish temple (Revelation 11:1) which they will have built on the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem, and to keep control of the Old City, for at least 7 more years (Daniel 9:27a), so long as they give up the outer court of the temple (Revelation 11:2a) to the Muslims so that the Muslims can rebuild the Al Aqsa Mosque on the southern end of the Temple Mount and resume worship there. By this peace treaty, the Antichrist could present himself to the world as (in his words): "A reasonable man, a man of peace. I am no Hitler. I do not desire a second Holocaust. I am willing to give the religious Jews in the Old City seven years to show that they are willing to live peacefully with others, that they are different than the Zionist Jews who have just destroyed the world with their nuclear weapons".

And if the Antichrist gets flak from his fellow Baathists for letting the ultra-Orthodox Jews keep the Old City of Jerusalem, he could explain to them privately that (in his words) "It is all a temporary ruse, meant to keep world opinion off guard while we consolidate our position". The Baathists could consolidate their position by becoming so well dug-in, and so well-equipped and -advised militarily by the Russians (in the name of "Arab self-determination"), that a U.S. counter-attack to "restore" (i.e. to take back) Israel and Egypt could fail, and leave the Baathists in control, and in a position to extend their power over all the rest of the Arab nations. For if the Baathists defeat and occupy Israel, they will be hailed by the Arab masses across the Arab world as magnificent heroes, so that the Baathists could have no problem persuading the Arab masses to support them. And the Baathists could justify their defeat of the Egyptian military regime, and then their subsequent defeat of other regimes such as in Jordan, by railing against them as being (what they could call):

"These vile cronies of the Americans. These cronies pretended to be for the Arab people while in fact they were taking American bribes in the billions, completely selling out our Palestinian brothers to the endless cruelties of the Zionist occupation, and keeping you, the great majority of the Arab people, in poverty. These cronies, like the Zionists themselves, were the American bulwarks against our glorious Arab unification and return to world power. Join now with us, the Baathists, that we might bring about the long-awaited Arab Renaissance, the long-awaited Arab Resurrection [the Arab word 'Baath' can mean 'Renaissance' and 'Resurrection'], that we Arabs might all rise up together and unite, from Oman to Morocco, into one great United Arab States, one great Arab Empire, shaking off completely all the shackles of the West, placed upon us so long ago, and return to our former glory as we had during the Middle Ages, when we were free and far superior to the West".

The Baathists could also rail against the kings and sheikhs of the Arab Gulf States for (in their words) "Hoarding the huge oil wealth given by Allah to all the Arabs, and keeping the Arab masses in poverty and subjugation to Western interests". The Baathists are socialist, and so could call for the distribution of the Arab oil wealth to the Arab masses (Daniel 11:24). In this way, and by their defeat and occupation of Israel, the Baathists could easily turn the masses to their side in every Arab nation.

During the first few years of the 7-year peace treaty referred to earlier, the Antichrist could employ Baathism as the means by which he will gradually and peacefully put together a United Arab States, or Arab Union, stretching from Oman to Morocco. Once he has accomplished this, he could then begin to downplay Baathism and start speaking of "World peace and the unity of mankind". He could convince an oil-thirsty European Union to let the oil-rich Arab Union join it, thereby forming a massive Mediterranean Union, which he could manage to peacefully gain control of and use as his base of power to eventually exert his hegemony over the entire earth (Revelation 13:7b).

Then, only some 3.5 years after making the peace treaty, the Antichrist will break it, attack the 3rd Jewish temple in Jerusalem, stop the daily Mosaic animal sacrifices offered in front of it, and sit (at least one time) in the temple and proclaim himself God (Daniel 11:31,36, Matthew 24:15; 2 Thessalonians 2:4). He will then rule the whole earth by the power of Lucifer (Satan, the dragon: Revelation 12:9) for 3.5 literal years (Revelation 13:4-18, Daniel 7:25, Daniel 12:7, Revelation 12:14), or 1,260 literal days (Revelation 12:6).

The return of Jesus Christ from heaven (Matthew 24:30, Revelation 19:11-21; 1 Thessalonians 4:16) may not occur immediately after the 1,260 days of the Antichrist's worldwide reign, but could occur 75 days later, on the 1,335th day after the Antichrist and his followers set up the abomination of desolation (possibly a standing, android image of the Antichrist) in the holy place (the inner sanctum) of the 3rd Jewish temple (Daniel 12:11-12, Daniel 11:31, Matthew 24:15). The 75 days could be taken up by the vials of God's wrath which will be poured out on the Antichrist's worshippers (Revelation 16).

When Jesus returns, he will completely defeat the Antichrist (the individual-man aspect of the beast) (Revelation 19:20; 2 Thessalonians 2:8-9), and he will have Satan bound in the bottomless pit (Revelation 20:1-3). Then the returned Jesus and the physically resurrected church (including those in the church who will have been beheaded by the Antichrist) will reign physically on the earth for 1,000 years (Revelation 20:4-6, Revelation 5:10, Revelation 2:26-29, Psalms 66:3-4, Psalms 72:8-11, Zechariah 14:8-21).
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
iamlamad said in post 68:

The sixth seal must wait for the rapture of the church . . .

The 6th seal (Revelation 6:12-14) could be fulfilled in our future by a huge volcanic eruption (possibly of the Yellowstone Caldera) which will occur during only the first stage of the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24. This eruption could begin with a large earthquake (Revelation 6:12), signaling the sudden rising of magma within the volcano. When it erupts, it could shoot so much ash and smoke into the sky that the sun will appear darkened and the moon blood-red (Revelation 6:12b), like happens during large forest fires. The volcano could also shoot blobs of red-hot magma into the sky, which as they fall back down could appear like falling stars (Revelation 6:13). And it could shoot so much super-heated ash and smoke so high and so quickly into the sky that they could form a gigantic mushroom cloud which will make the sky (the 1st heaven) look like a scroll being rolled up (Revelation 6:14). Earthquakes connected with the eruption could be so large that they set off a chain reaction of other earthquakes in nearby faults and volcanoes, which could set off even more earthquakes further away, and so on, so that earthquakes will end up affecting every mountain and island, moving each of their positions at least a little bit (Revelation 6:14b).

iamlamad said in post 68:

But those living in the darkness cannot escape this "sudden destruction" . . .

1 Thessalonians 5:3 could include reference to when, near the end of the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24, at the 2 witnesses' death at the legal end of the Antichrist's 3.5-year worldwide reign (Revelation 11:8,15, Revelation 13:5-18), the unsaved world will rejoice and make merry because it will then be free from the tormenting plagues from the 2 witnesses (Revelation 11:10,6). But little will the unsaved world realize that the plagues of the 7 vials of God's judgment and wrath will then be poured out upon it (Revelation 16). And then Jesus will return and bring the 2nd-coming judgment and wrath of God (Revelation 19:11 to 20:3).

iamlamad said in post 68:

Make no mistake: that great crowd seen around the throne room in Rev. 7 is the raptured church.

Note that Revelation 7:9-17 doesn't require a pre-tribulation rapture. For in Revelation 7:9-17, the great multitude can be only that part of the church (Revelation 7:14b) which will enter the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24, and then come out of it (Revelation 7:14) and enter heaven (Revelation 7:15) by dying (cf. Philippians 1:21,23; 2 Corinthians 5:8) during the 2nd through 6th seals in the chapter just prior (Revelation 6), the tribulation's first stage.

This would be similar to how the souls of "them that were slain for the word of God", who will be under the altar in heaven at the 5th seal (Revelation 6:9-11), will enter heaven by dying sometime before the 5th seal. And it would be similar to how those in the church who will be on the sea of glass in heaven (Revelation 15:2, cf. Revelation 12:11) at the tribulation's 7 last plagues (Revelation chapters 15-16), the tribulation's final stage, will enter heaven by dying during the just-preceding, literal 3.5-year worldwide reign of the Antichrist (the individual-man aspect of Revelation's "beast") (Revelation 13:5-10, Revelation 14:12-13, Revelation 20:4-6, Matthew 24:9-13).

Regarding the rapture, note that no scripture requires believers will be raptured any higher than the clouds of the sky (the 1st heaven) to hold a meeting in the air with Jesus at his 2nd coming (1 Thessalonians 4:15-17). After that meeting, in which the church will be judged by Jesus (Psalms 50:3-5, cf. Mark 13:27), and the obedient part of the church will be married to Jesus (Revelation 19:7, Matthew 25:1-13), the obedient part of the church will come back down from the sky (the 1st heaven) with Jesus (Revelation 19:15-21) to reign on the earth with him for 1,000 years (Revelation 20:4-6, Revelation 5:10, Revelation 2:26-29). After the 1,000 years and subsequent events (Revelation 20:7-15, Ezekiel chapters 38-39), the obedient part of the church will live on the new earth with God the Father and Jesus in the literal city of New Jerusalem (Revelation chapters 21-22).

iamlamad said in post 68:

They were pulled OUT in the nick of time, while those left behind will suffer the "sudden destruction" . . .

Regarding "left behind", note that nothing in the Bible says or requires any believer will be left behind at the rapture.

Is such a mistaken idea usually based on Luke 17:26-37 and Matthew 24:37-41? If so, people should realize that these passages refer to what will happen at Jesus' 2nd coming, "when the Son of man is revealed" (Luke 17:30), "the coming of the Son of man" (Matthew 24:37,39), which Jesus had just finished saying won't happen until immediately after the future tribulation (Matthew 24:29-31). Those "taken" at the 2nd coming (Luke 17:34-36, Matthew 24:40-41) will be unsaved people who will be taken to where they will be killed and birds will eat their dead bodies (Luke 17:36-37; Matthew 24:28, cf. Job 39:30b; Revelation 19:21). The Greek word "paralambano" ("taken": Luke 17:34-36, Matthew 24:40-41) can be used to refer to being taken to another place to be killed (John 19:16-18).

Those "left" where they are at the 2nd coming (Luke 17:34-36, Matthew 24:40-41) will include unsaved people who will be forced to come up annually to worship the returned Jesus in Jerusalem during the millennium (Zechariah 14:16-19). These unsaved people will have to be ruled with a rod of iron by Jesus and the physically resurrected church during the millennium (Revelation 2:26-29, Revelation 5:10, Revelation 20:4-6, Psalms 2, Psalms 66:3, Psalms 72:8-11). And their descendants will be deceived by Satan after the millennium into committing the Gog/Magog rebellion (Revelation 20:7-10, Ezekiel chapters 38-39).

Before the millennium, at Jesus' 2nd coming, those in the church will neither be "taken" and killed, nor "left" where they are, but will be "gathered together" (raptured) (Matthew 24:31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1) into the sky to hold a meeting in the air with the returned Jesus (1 Thessalonians 4:17). The purpose of this rapture meeting will be so that those in the church can be judged by Jesus (Psalms 50:3-5, cf. Mark 13:27) and married to Jesus (Revelation 19:7) in the sky, before Jesus descends from the sky (the 1st heaven) with the obedient part of the church to bring the 2nd-coming wrath of God on the unsaved world (Revelation 19:14 to 20:3).

So the 2nd coming will be like "the days of Noah" (Matthew 24:37) and "the days of Lot" (Luke 17:28,30) in that just as Noah went into the ark before the Flood, and Lot went out from Sodom before it was destroyed by God, so the church will be raptured into the sky at the 2nd coming (1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, Matthew 24:30-31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8, Revelation 19:7) before Jesus begins the 2nd-coming wrath of God (Revelation 19:15 to 20:3, Luke 17:26-30, Matthew 24:37-39).

--

iamlamad said in post 69:

Does not the parable of the virgins leave some behind?

The 10-virgins parable (Matthew 25:1-13) shows that the marriage of the church to Jesus won't occur until his 2nd coming (Matthew 25:10), which Jesus had just finished saying won't occur until "immediately after the tribulation" (Matthew 24:29-31), just like Revelation 19:7 shows that the marriage won't occur until after the (never fulfilled) tribulation, shown in Revelation chapters 6 to 18. The parable's extra oil (Matthew 25:4,9b) could represent the continued good works of believers, by which they will be able to pass the judgment of the church by Jesus (Matthew 25:19-30, Romans 2:6-8) and enter the marriage of the church to Jesus at his 2nd coming (Matthew 25:10, Revelation 19:7-21).

The marriage supper (Revelation 19:9) won't have yet begun by the time of Revelation 19, which won't begin until after the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 (cf. Matthew 24:29-31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8). For regarding the church, the marriage supper will be a literal feast in the earthly Jerusalem after the resurrection and marriage of the church at Jesus' 2nd coming (Isaiah 25:6-9; 1 Corinthians 15:54, Revelation 19:7 to 20:6; 1 Thessalonians 4:15-16; 1 Corinthians 15:21-23,51-54). While the church will enjoy a feast "of fat things full of marrow, of wines on the lees well refined" (Isaiah 25:6), the birds will feast on the corpses of the world's armies defeated by Jesus' at his 2nd coming (Revelation 19:17-21).

Also, regarding the 10-virgins parable, in Matthew 25:6 "midnight" could represent mid-tribulation, when the abomination of desolation (possibly a standing, android image of the Antichrist) could be set up in the holy place (the inner sanctum) of a 3rd Jewish temple in Jerusalem (Matthew 24:15, Daniel 11:31). So when it says "at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh" (Matthew 25:6), this could mean that at the mid-tribulation point when the abomination of desolation is set up, the church will be given the knowledge of the date (as in the year, month, and day) of Jesus' 2nd coming. This date could be the 1,335th day after the abomination of desolation is set up (Daniel 12:11-12, cf. Revelation 16:15).

--

iamlamad said in post 70:

HOW can some believers have MORE Holy Spirit than others?

Everyone, both believers and unbelievers, has some minimal measure of God's Spirit by which they are able to exist (Acts 17:28, Psalms 104:30) and have human consciousness (John 1:9). Believers have some greater measure of the Spirit, by which they are able to understand and believe the scriptures (1 Corinthians 2:12-16, John 20:22, Luke 24:45-47). Believers who have received Holy Spirit baptism (Acts 11:16, Acts 19:2a,6) have an even greater measure of the Spirit, by which they are able to operate in one or more of the Spirit's gifts (1 Corinthians 12:8-11). Because Jesus is God (John 1:1,14), he has the Spirit in an infinite amount, beyond measure (John 3:34).

-

Besides getting water baptized, believers can get Holy Spirit baptized (Acts 11:15-16, Acts 10:44-46). They usually have to ask to receive the Holy Spirit (Luke 11:13b) baptism, for it is usually not given to them automatically at the moment they become believers. That is why Paul the apostle asked some believers: "Have ye received the Holy Spirit since ye believed?" (Acts 19:2).

Believers usually receive Holy Spirit baptism through prayer accompanied by the laying on of hands, subsequent to water baptism (Acts 8:15-17, Acts 19:5-6). Holy Spirit baptism won't result in speaking in tongues for everyone (1 Corinthians 12:30), but for almost everyone, as tongues are one of the Spirit's lesser gifts (1 Corinthians 12:8,9,10,11,28; 1 Corinthians 14:5). Many believers haven't yet experienced Holy Spirit baptism simply because they haven't yet asked for it, under the principle of "ye have not, because ye ask not" (James 4:2b). Many believers haven't yet asked for it because they have come under the influence of mistaken teachings which say it is no longer in effect. Believers can get hands laid on them to receive Holy Spirit baptism at any Pentecostal-type congregation, or at any charismatic-type congregation, which can be of almost any denomination.
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
Danoh said in post 82:

It is about Prophecy [Fallen Earth, Rm. 5:12] and Mystery [Fallen High Places, Eph. 6:12].

Note that the "mystery" in Romans 16:25-26 and Colossians 1:26 is "made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets" (Romans 16:26).

For example, Isaiah 49:6 and Isaiah 42:6 foretold that Jesus' gospel of the New Covenant (Matthew 26:28; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4), made only with Israel (Jeremiah 31:31-34), would save both Jewish and Gentile believers (Acts 26:22-23, Luke 24:46-47). The New Covenant includes Gentile believers by grafting them into Israel (Romans 11:17,24, Ephesians 2:12,19, Galatians 3:29, John 10:16).

Isaiah 49:6b started to be fulfilled at Jesus' first coming (Luke 2:32, Acts 26:23) and his sending forth of his apostles to the Gentiles (Acts 13:47, Mark 16:15, Matthew 28:19-20, Acts 26:17-18, Acts 22:21).

Also, Paul quotes 4 Old Testament verses in Romans 15:9-12 that foretold the salvation of the Gentiles (2 Samuel 22:50/Psalms 18:49, Deuteronomy 32:43, Psalms 117:1, Isaiah 11:10).

God chose Peter the apostle to be the first one to take the gospel of salvation to the Gentiles (Acts 15:7, Acts 10:34-48), to make Gentile believers partakers of the Jews' spiritual things (Romans 15:27, John 4:22b), just as Paul sometimes preached the gospel to Jews (e.g. Acts 13:16-41).

This mystery (Ephesians 3:4) is also explained in Ephesians 3:6, which means that believing Gentiles become fellowheirs with believing Israelites, and of the same body as Israel, and partakers of God's promise in Christ made to Israel. For all genetic Jews in the church remain members of whichever tribe of Israel they were born into (Romans 11:1, Acts 4:36). And all genetic Gentiles in the church have been grafted into Israel (Romans 11:17,24, Ephesians 2:12,19, Galatians 3:29), and so have been grafted into its various tribes (cf. Ezekiel 47:21-23). So the entire church is the 12 tribes of Israel (Revelation 21:9,12; 1 Peter 2:9-10). This is necessary, for all those in the church are saved only by the New Covenant (Matthew 26:28; 1 Corinthians 11:25; 2 Corinthians 3:6, Hebrews 9:15), which is made only with Israel (Jeremiah 31:31-34, John 4:22b). John 10:16 refers to the "other sheep" of believers who are Gentiles being brought into "this fold" of Israel, which is the "one fold" of the church (1 Corinthians 12:13, Ephesians 4:4-6, Revelation 21:9,12). A genetic Gentile believer can pray and ask which tribe of Israel he has been grafted into, and he will receive an answer from God, if he asks in faith (cf. Matthew 21:22), without any wavering (cf. James 1:6-7).
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,894
1,434
South
✟113,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Originally Posted by duolos on the Dispy forum, Berkhoof Thread:
Oh you mean like Eph 2:11-13 where Paul says that the Church is the citizens of Israel? End Quote

Answer:

No - like Eph. 2:11-13, where Paul says all that after Israel's commonwealth was headed for 70AD.

How is it that Paul relates Israel's status then, to those with eyes to see - oh, yeah, "them that WERE nigh."

Problem is , most think the issue is peoples, and salvation. It is neither.

Its about a planned solving in advance, for two falls, in two different realms set in motion by the words "I will be like the Most High," Is. 14:14.

It is about Prophecy [Fallen Earth, Rm. 5:12] and Mystery [Fallen High Places, Eph. 6:12].

It is about a Two-Fold Plan and Purpose as to solving for that, Eph. 1:10; 3:15.

Deal with this Scripture with Scripture, not Scripture with books about, including Berkhoff, Stam, or whomever where their assertions do not fit that.
I have no problem dealing with any issue on this forum by comparing scripture with scripture as you should well know. Shall we compare the scriptures on Christ’s coming that show they all refer to the same event and not two comings? Shall we compare scriptures on the resurrection that show there is only one future resurrection for the righteous dead and not multiple resurrections. Shall we compare scriptures on the timing of His return that show that will happen after “the tribulation of those days” and the revealing of antichrist and not before.

I was merely interjecting into a topic raised by others on this forum. It must have been a good point, no one came forth with the requested evidence to back the point raised many times on these forums by those who wish to prove their false doctrine is actually long established church teaching.

I did not come to the conclusions I now hold by listening to or reading books written by men to promote either side. I arrived at my present belief by doing just what you suggest, comparing scripture with scripture,with the help of my Teacher.It is the only valid way to study the scripture. Can we agree on that point?
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,624
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟102,371.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
If her vision does not line up totally with God's written Words then the vision must me considered suspect and rejected.

I have highlighted in blue the obvious lie.
...it is not known what the sign of the Son of man is; the people of God think they are waiting, but they know not what it is

I saw the error to be, that men think that it will be something seen by the natural eye but 'tis spiritual discernment that is needed, the eye of God in his people.

[This is Margaret Macdonald's handwritten account of her 1830 Pre-Trib revelation, as included in Robert Norton's Memoirs of James & George Macdonald of Port-Glasgow (1840), pp. 171-176. The italicized portions represent her account as it appears in shorter form in Norton's The Restoration of Apostles and Prophets; In the Catholic Apostolic Church (1861), pp 15-18.]

"It was first the awful state of the land that was pressed upon me.(1) I saw the blindness and infatuation of the people to be very great. I felt the cry of Liberty just to be the hiss of the serpent, to drown them in perdition. It was just `no God.' I repeated the words, Now there is distress of nations, with perplexity, the seas and the waves roaring, men's hearts failing them for fear - now look out for the sign of the Son of man. Here I was made to stop and cry out, 0 it is not known what the sign of the Son of man is; the people of God think they are waiting, but they know not what it is. I felt this needed to be revealed, and that there was great darkness and error about it; but suddenly what it was burst upon me with a glorious light I saw it was just the Lord himself descending from Heaven with a shout, just the glorified man. even Jesus; but that all must, as Stephen was, be filled with the Holy Ghost, that they might look up, and see the brightness of the Father's glory. I saw the error to be, that men think that it will be something seen by the natural eye; but 'tis spiritual discernment that is needed, the eye of God in his people.

The written Word of God about the sign of the Son of man visible with the natural eyes...
Matthew 24:27-31 (KJV)
27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
....
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

How do you know this part you have highlighted is a lie?

Of course you never stopped to think that when Jesus is hidden in a cloud He would be invisible to those on the earth unless God opened their spiritual eyes. Since you deny His coming hidden in a cloud, and only see ONE
I have no problem dealing with any issue on this forum by comparing scripture with scripture as you should well know. Shall we compare the scriptures on Christ’s coming that show they all refer to the same event and not two comings? Shall we compare scriptures on the resurrection that show there is only one future resurrection for the righteous dead and not multiple resurrections. Shall we compare scriptures on the timing of His return that show that will happen after “the tribulation of those days” and the revealing of antichrist and not before.

I was merely interjecting into a topic raised by others on this forum. It must have been a good point, no one came forth with the requested evidence to back the point raised many times on these forums by those who wish to prove their false doctrine is actually long established church teaching.

I did not come to the conclusions I now hold by listening to or reading books written by men to promote either side. I arrived at my present belief by doing just what you suggest, comparing scripture with scripture,with the help of my Teacher.It is the only valid way to study the scripture. Can we agree on that point?


Here we go again:

"Shall we compare the scriptures on Christ’s coming that show they all refer to the same event and not two comings?"


This is your opinion and not fact, and you seem to portray. Untold millions of evangelicals disagree with this statement. We think the bible shows two comings.

For example, how could Jesus be hidden in a cloud, but be seen by all at the same time? How much better if in one coming He only comes to the clouds and remains hidden, while in another coming He comes with the brightness of the sun, when it is dark, and lights up this world where every eye does see Him. These scriptures seem to show two comings.

For example, when we put John 14 with 1 thes. 4, Jesus comes to the clouds and then returns to heaven, while in the Rev. 19 coming He is coming to stay. Again it seems to point to TWO comings. Post tribbers must push John 14 to some unknown time in the future where they only guess that the places prepared come to earth.

Shall we compare scriptures on the resurrection that show there is only one future resurrection for the righteous dead and not multiple resurrections.

Again millions of believers think, by reading the very same scriptures you read, that there will be multiply resurrections. There is no scripture to prove that the Old Testament saints rise with the New Testament saints. In fact, by Paul's own wording it seems scripture proves otherwise. Paul tells us the New Testament rapture is strictly for those "in Christ." millions of believers understand this to mean only those who have been born again. One could say that the Old Testament saints who died before Christ accepted Him in Paradise (where Lazarus was). It is a legitimate argument - or did Paul mean those "in Christ" while they were living - meaning ONLY New Testament saints.

Shall we compare scriptures on the timing of His return that show that will happen after “the tribulation of those days” and the revealing of antichrist and not before.

AGain millions of believers who read the same scriptures think His next coming will be before the "tribulation" begins. If these things were written clearly in scripture, we would not have any disagreements. OF COURSE He comes "after the tribulation of those days." I don't think any would disagree with this, for it is clearly written. However, it seems that Paul's writings point to a different timing. Paul tells us there is a SUDDENLY coming. At this sudden event, two groups of people get two different results: those living "in Christ" get "salvation" [raptured] and get to "live together with Him." [So shall we ever be with the Lord.] AT the very same suddenly, [the sudden event of the dead in Christ rising] those living in darkness and sin get a totally different result: they get caught in "sudden destruction." Paul then ties this "sudden destruction" to the wrath of God, and also with the start of the Day of the Lord. I have long believed that Paul's "sudden destruction" is the 6th seal earthquake. This earthquake will be caused by the dead in Christ rising. It will be a world-wide earthquake, because the dead in Christ have died the world around.

Therefore, since the dead in Christ rising causes a worldwide earthquake "sudden destruction" that is the start of the Day of the Lord as Paul shows us, and the start of God's wrath, and John shows us that these events will precede and follow the 6th seal shown in Rev. chapter 6, and John further shows us that God's wrath in the vials comes later but still before His coming shown in Rev. 19, it is simply impossible that the rapture event of Paul comes at this coming in Rev. 19. God's people MUST be removed from the earth before God's wrath: it is His promise to us. Even millions of prewrathers believe this.

Therefore we can only agree on one point: comparing scripture with scripture and depending on the Holy Spirit to teach us is the best way to study scripture.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,894
1,434
South
✟113,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How do you know this part you have highlighted is a lie?

Of course you never stopped to think that when Jesus is hidden in a cloud He would be invisible to those on the earth unless God opened their spiritual eyes. Since you deny His coming hidden in a cloud, and only see ONE



Here we go again:

"Shall we compare the scriptures on Christ’s coming that show they all refer to the same event and not two comings?"


This is your opinion and not fact, and you seem to portray. Untold millions of evangelicals disagree with this statement. We think the bible shows two comings.

For example, how could Jesus be hidden in a cloud, but be seen by all at the same time? How much better if in one coming He only comes to the clouds and remains hidden, while in another coming He comes with the brightness of the sun, when it is dark, and lights up this world where every eye does see Him. These scriptures seem to show two comings.

For example, when we put John 14 with 1 thes. 4, Jesus comes to the clouds and then returns to heaven, while in the Rev. 19 coming He is coming to stay. Again it seems to point to TWO comings. Post tribbers must push John 14 to some unknown time in the future where they only guess that the places prepared come to earth.

Shall we compare scriptures on the resurrection that show there is only one future resurrection for the righteous dead and not multiple resurrections.

Again millions of believers think, by reading the very same scriptures you read, that there will be multiply resurrections. There is no scripture to prove that the Old Testament saints rise with the New Testament saints. In fact, by Paul's own wording it seems scripture proves otherwise. Paul tells us the New Testament rapture is strictly for those "in Christ." millions of believers understand this to mean only those who have been born again. One could say that the Old Testament saints who died before Christ accepted Him in Paradise (where Lazarus was). It is a legitimate argument - or did Paul mean those "in Christ" while they were living - meaning ONLY New Testament saints.

Shall we compare scriptures on the timing of His return that show that will happen after “the tribulation of those days” and the revealing of antichrist and not before.

AGain millions of believers who read the same scriptures think His next coming will be before the "tribulation" begins. If these things were written clearly in scripture, we would not have any disagreements. OF COURSE He comes "after the tribulation of those days." I don't think any would disagree with this, for it is clearly written. However, it seems that Paul's writings point to a different timing. Paul tells us there is a SUDDENLY coming. At this sudden event, two groups of people get two different results: those living "in Christ" get "salvation" [raptured] and get to "live together with Him." [So shall we ever be with the Lord.] AT the very same suddenly, [the sudden event of the dead in Christ rising] those living in darkness and sin get a totally different result: they get caught in "sudden destruction." Paul then ties this "sudden destruction" to the wrath of God, and also with the start of the Day of the Lord. I have long believed that Paul's "sudden destruction" is the 6th seal earthquake. This earthquake will be caused by the dead in Christ rising. It will be a world-wide earthquake, because the dead in Christ have died the world around.

Therefore, since the dead in Christ rising causes a worldwide earthquake "sudden destruction" that is the start of the Day of the Lord as Paul shows us, and the start of God's wrath, and John shows us that these events will precede and follow the 6th seal shown in Rev. chapter 6, and John further shows us that God's wrath in the vials comes later but still before His coming shown in Rev. 19, it is simply impossible that the rapture event of Paul comes at this coming in Rev. 19. God's people MUST be removed from the earth before God's wrath: it is His promise to us. Even millions of prewrathers believe this.

Therefore we can only agree on one point: comparing scripture with scripture and depending on the Holy Spirit to teach us is the best way to study scripture.

Matt 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

Matt 26:64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Mark 13:26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.

Mark 14:62 And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

1 Thess 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

Which of these verses say he is hidden in the clouds or comes to the clouds? Answer none, you stated your opinion.

Acts 26:13 At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.

Is this the verse to which you refer? This is a personal appearance just for Paul. This was mid day not dark. Paul said the light from heaven was “above the brightness of the sun”.

2 Thess 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

Where does this passage say “it is dark, and lights up this world where every eye does see Him”? Answer it doesn’t you mix and match scriptures and stated your opinion.

John14:2 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

Where does it say anyone returns to heaven? Answer nowhere, you stated your opinion. I can show you a verse where the place prepared comes to earth, I’m not guessing at it as you are when you assume John 14 says a return to heaven. When he comes He will be here and that’s where we will be also.

1 Thess 4: 16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Where does this scripture say we return to heaven? Answer nowhere not even if you put it with John 14, again you have stated your opinion, not fact.

I’m really not concerned with what millions of believers think, if I can’t find it in my bible. Daniel, Job, Jesus, Paul and John spoke of one resurrection. What scripture do you use for the Old Testament saints resurrection? Can you show us proof with inserting your opinion?

Again millions of believers can be wrong. When you say “However, it seems that Paul's writings point to a different timing.” Sounds like your opinion again. I can make my case with what scripture actually says you “seem” rely more on majority opinion and word play, and have to spend far more time trying to convince us the scripture doesn’t meant what it says, or we just don’t understand what Paul meant. You divide up all scriptures on the topic and arbitrarily decide which in your opinion are pre or post. If you harmonize these scriptures many points that are the same and you don’t have say “it seems” this or that. God’s people do not have to be removed to be protected if that’s what God choses to do, remember Noah, he never left this earth. Many will die a martyr’s death but God’s people will not experience his wrath. You accused me of stating my opinion while all the while doing the same thing yourself. There is no pre-tib rapture found anywhere in scripture without using the tactics you’ve just displayed here. Here we go again. Good to hear from you again my brother, Lamad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,624
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟102,371.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Matt 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

Matt 26:64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Mark 13:26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.

Mark 14:62 And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

1 Thess 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

Which of these verses say he is hidden in the clouds or comes to the clouds? Answer none, you stated your opinion.

Acts 26:13 At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.

Is this the verse to which you refer? This is a personal appearance just for Paul. This was mid day not dark. Paul said the light from heaven was “above the brightness of the sun”.

2 Thess 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

Where does this passage say “it is dark, and lights up this world where every eye does see Him”? Answer it doesn’t you mix and match scriptures and stated your opinion.

John14:2 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

Where does it say anyone returns to heaven? Answer nowhere, you stated your opinion. I can show you a verse where the place prepared comes to earth, I’m not guessing at it as you are when you assume John 14 says a return to heaven. When he comes He will be here and that’s where we will be also.

1 Thess 4: 16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Where does this scripture say we return to heaven? Answer nowhere not even if you put it with John 14, again you have stated your opinion, not fact.

I’m really not concerned with what millions of believers think, if I can’t find it in my bible. Daniel, Job, Jesus, Paul and John spoke of one resurrection. What scripture do you use for the Old Testament saints resurrection? Can you show us proof with inserting your opinion?

Again millions of believers can be wrong. When you say “However, it seems that Paul's writings point to a different timing.” Sounds like your opinion again. I can make my case with what scripture actually says you “seem” rely more on majority opinion and word play, and have to spend far more time trying to convince us the scripture doesn’t meant what it says, or we just don’t understand what Paul meant. You divide up all scriptures on the topic and arbitrarily decide which in your opinion are pre or post. If you harmonize these scriptures many points that are the same and you don’t have say “it seems” this or that. God’s people do not have to be removed to be protected if that’s what God choses to do, remember Noah, he never left this earth. Many will die a martyr’s death but God’s people will not experience his wrath. You accused me of stating my opinion while all the while doing the same thing yourself. There is no pre-tib rapture found anywhere in scripture without using the tactics you’ve just displayed here. Here we go again. Good to hear from you again my brother, Lamad.


If we had 100 5th graders read the John 14 passage, I believe most, if not all of them would say that passage is telling us that Jesus goes to heaven to prepare us a place, then comes and takes us to that place. It is a test I would like to do sometime. This understanding is confirmed when we look in Rev. 19 and see that the marriage takes place in heaven before Jesus returns. Then the wedding supper - still before Jesus returns. You can miss this marriage if you wish. I want to be there. Again I think if we had a hundred beginning readers read this chapter, then asked them to show which comes first: the marriage or His coming, we would have 100% tell us the marriage comes first.

You can act like this is cut and dried, but it is not. If it was, all would be on one side of this argument. You can quote every passage about His coming as shown in Rev. 19. Of course they are true. No pretribber denies they are true. Paul does not tell us that "every eye shall see Him" when He comes for His bride. Perhaps those verses will be true for BOTH comings.

If you will notice, when "every eye shall see Him" He is "with" the clouds. Can He be seen when He is IN the clouds? When I see a plane fly "in" the clouds, it disappears. Could it be that "every eye shall see Him" when He steps OUT of the clouds and lands on earth? Could "every eye" mean on a TV screen? Could it mean when He lights up the sky like lightning? If He comes FOR His bride before the 6th seal as I think the bible teaches us, I really don't know if He will be seen or not.

Perhaps all will see Him then, and also see the Bride as we leave. Even the very best bible scholars of the Old Testament did not know much about His first coming, simply because the few scriptures about His first coming were written so they would be obvious after the fact, but not so obvious before the fact. Now that we have the gospels, we know MUCH about His first coming. It is the same way now. We know He is coming. Some believe He is coming twice more. Some don't. God could have chosen to make this much clearer in scripture than it is. For some reason He chose not to.

You asked about darkness. At the 5th vial the Beast's kingdom becomes dark, as if God just turns off the sun. I cannot find where this darkness leaves. I suspect it will remain dark until He comes. Question: is lightning seen more easily in the dark, or during the day? When Matthew and Luke describe His coming, it seems more like they are talking about lightning in the darkness. However, during a bad storm, it does get darker, and lighting can be seen.

So the truth is, we have DIFFERING opinions over these verses. Both opinions cannot be right. Either there is only one coming in our future, or their will be two. If or when He comes first FOR His bride, then all will know.

Where does it say anyone returns to heaven?

What is the simplest reading of this passage? I will ask some Chinese students this question. Most of them will have never read anything from the bible. We will see how they answer. I think you have to add meaning to think He does NOT return back to where He prepared places for the Bride. What we both can agree on is that Jesus remains in heaven during the entire 70th week. Therefore, if Jesus does come before the 6th seal as Paul hints strongly, Jesus MUST return to heaven because that is where He will be for the entire week.

What scripture do you use for the Old Testament saints resurrection? Can you show us proof with inserting your opinion?

There is no solid proof for much of what we are discussing. If there were solid proof we would not be having this discussion. You know this as well as I do. There are very wise men on both sides of this argument. I believe Rosenthal and Van Kampen were well studied in their bibles, but they went off on a different theory, and ended up destroying their ministry.

Why do I think the Old Testament saints rise at a different time? Simply because while they lived they were not "in Christ." I think Paul's resurrection/rapture is strictly for the church. Earthquakes are a strong hint to this theory. I am convinced then when people long dead are raised, their raising will cause an earthquake. The longer they are dead, the greater the earthquake. For those who will be raised who lived before the flood, I suspect it will cause the world's worst earthquake. However, the bible only HINTS at this, but does not come right out and tell us point blank.


Of course millions of believers can be wrong. All of us are wrong in some areas of our beliefs. No one has all truth. I know some THINK they do, but they are wrong. I use the words "it seems" simply because different people read these passages differently and come up with different beliefs. Paul does not come right out and say WHEN this rapture will take place. But He does hint very strongly that it will be the trigger for the Day of the Lord and the wrath of God.

One final thought: you are forced to rearrange Revelation to make your theories work. I am not.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,624
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟102,371.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Matt 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.



I can make my case with what scripture actually says you “seem” rely more on majority opinion and word play, and have to spend far more time trying to convince us the scripture doesn’t meant what it says, or we just don’t understand what Paul meant.

You can certainly make a case that in ONE coming "every eye will see Him." You cannot make that case in His 1 Thes. 4 coming because Paul does not tell us. Neither can you make any case that there is only one more coming. You may think you can, but you really can't.

I am not willing to rearrange Revelation, for I believe God and John were meticulous in writing things in their perfect order: the very order these things will take place when they come. You seem very willing to rearrange. So in this case it is YOU who tell us scripture does not mean what it says. I am referring to the marriage and supper.

Paul ties his rapture event to the start of the Day of the Lord. He goes further and tells us his rapture will trigger this day and start God's wrath. I find what Paul wrote fits perfectly into Revelation as the event that causes the great earthquake at the 6th seal. After all, there is where John tells us God's wrath begins. I see the 6th seal as coming before the entire 70th week. I don't have to write "it seems" here because John did a very good job of putting the seals and trumpets and vials in order and even numbered them. He also made it very clear that the trumpets cannot begin until the 7th seal is broken or opened.

I choose to believe what John wrote, that "The day of His wrath is come." Apparently you choose not to believe this. If I understand your theory, the Day of His wrath begins when HE comes.
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,894
1,434
South
✟113,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You can certainly make a case that in ONE coming "every eye will see Him." You cannot make that case in His 1 Thes. 4 coming because Paul does not tell us. Neither can you make any case that there is only one more coming. You may think you can, but you really can't.

I am not willing to rearrange Revelation, for I believe God and John were meticulous in writing things in their perfect order: the very order these things will take place when they come. You seem very willing to rearrange. So in this case it is YOU who tell us scripture does not mean what it says. I am referring to the marriage and supper.

Paul ties his rapture event to the start of the Day of the Lord. He goes further and tells us his rapture will trigger this day and start God's wrath. I find what Paul wrote fits perfectly into Revelation as the event that causes the great earthquake at the 6th seal. After all, there is where John tells us God's wrath begins. I see the 6th seal as coming before the entire 70th week. I don't have to write "it seems" here because John did a very good job of putting the seals and trumpets and vials in order and even numbered them. He also made it very clear that the trumpets cannot begin until the 7th seal is broken or opened.

I choose to believe what John wrote, that "The day of His wrath is come." Apparently you choose not to believe this. If I understand your theory, the Day of His wrath begins when HE comes.
.
I've heard it said if you take a new convert at let them read the scriptures without outside influence, they will never see a pre- trib rapture in scripture. I can't prove that but I can see where it would be true. Some things are cut and dried. Paul told us plainly this coming will be after the apostasy and the man of sin being revealed, it is not I that had to rearrange this fact to fit my theory. I know all too well how you interpret that, I just disagree with your conclusion and method for getting there. As for rearranging Revelation if one accepts the premise that you are correct in what you believe to be the correct order of revelation then by that standard I do rearrange. I believe the book is meant to be read differently and have what I believe to be sound reasons for doing so. There may even be millions of Christians that agree with the way I read it, but that does not prove anything. I responded to your challenge of my post with the scriptures you brought up and what they say, you seem to like a different approach, no problem. Let me know the results of your 5th grader pole. Don't forget I spent the better part of my Christian life agreeing with you. I didn't change my mind easily.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,624
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟102,371.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
.
I've heard it said if you take a new convert at let them read the scriptures without outside influence, they will never see a pre- trib rapture in scripture. I can't prove that but I can see where it would be true. Some things are cut and dried. Paul told us plainly this coming will be after the apostasy and the man of sin being revealed, it is not I that had to rearrange this fact to fit my theory. I know all too well how you interpret that, I just disagree with your conclusion and method for getting there. As for rearranging Revelation if one accepts the premise that you are correct in what you believe to be the correct order of revelation then by that standard I do rearrange. I believe the book is meant to be read differently and have what I believe to be sound reasons for doing so. There may even be millions of Christians that agree with the way I read it, but that does not prove anything. I responded to your challenge of my post with the scriptures you brought up and what they say, you seem to like a different approach, no problem. Let me know the results of your 5th grader pole. Don't forget I spent the better part of my Christian life agreeing with you. I didn't change my mind easily.

Well, I have a small report in: not 5th graders but Chinese students that have never read the bible.

I let them read the first 3 verses of John 14 and ask them these questions. I used a translation that used the word "mansions."

Where do you think He is saying He will go to prepare these mansions?
When He comes to get those whom He has chosen, where will He take them? To the mansions He has prepared, or somewhere else?​

So far here is what I have:

Claudiayeh 10:19 EDT
I guess he will take people back to the mansions He has prepared.

labelle_ncy 10:59 EDT
i think he go to the heaven for prepare to the people that time over
that is correct? sorry for my poor english

_meoeat 10:11 EDT
I don't know

bookfc 10:00 EDT
To the mansions He has prepare

mintiizmine 9:45 EDT
1.in heaven
2.mansions

Pockyone 9:27 EDT
The place where love and truth exist
people trusting him

(My answer) 9:29 EDT
Ah......thanks, but he never mentioned love and truth.
The biggest question: will He take His people back to where He prepared these mansions, or will He take them somewhere else? What do you think?​

Pockyone 9:31 EDT
Haha it is Jesus saying so I imagine it...
He will take His people back to where He prepared these mansions,...


It is not much, but it is just what I expected: people who have never read or heard anything about the bible would read this as Jesus going to heaven to prepare a place for us, then coming and getting us and taking us to those places he has prepared. This is the central theme of pretrib.

Paul told us plainly this coming will be after the apostasy and the man of sin being revealed


We have been down this road before too. You say it is very plain. I don't think that passage is plain at all. It SEEMS plain at first reading, but the more you study it the less plain it becomes. I am sure we will continue to disagree on it, but when we get to heaven, I will get to say, "I told you so!" ;-) It is my belief that you changed your mind needlessly.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,894
1,434
South
✟113,441.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, I have a small report in: not 5th graders but Chinese students that have never read the bible.

I let them read the first 3 verses of John 14 and ask them these questions. I used a translation that used the word "mansions."

Where do you think He is saying He will go to prepare these mansions?
When He comes to get those whom He has chosen, where will He take them? To the mansions He has prepared, or somewhere else?​

So far here is what I have:

Claudiayeh 10:19 EDT
I guess he will take people back to the mansions He has prepared.

labelle_ncy 10:59 EDT
i think he go to the heaven for prepare to the people that time over
that is correct? sorry for my poor english

_meoeat 10:11 EDT
I don't know

bookfc 10:00 EDT
To the mansions He has prepare

mintiizmine 9:45 EDT
1.in heaven
2.mansions

Pockyone 9:27 EDT
The place where love and truth exist
people trusting him

(My answer) 9:29 EDT
Ah......thanks, but he never mentioned love and truth.
The biggest question: will He take His people back to where He prepared these mansions, or will He take them somewhere else? What do you think?​

Pockyone 9:31 EDT
Haha it is Jesus saying so I imagine it...
He will take His people back to where He prepared these mansions,...


It is not much, but it is just what I expected: people who have never read or heard anything about the bible would read this as Jesus going to heaven to prepare a place for us, then coming and getting us and taking us to those places he has prepared. This is the central theme of pretrib.

Paul told us plainly this coming will be after the apostasy and the man of sin being revealed


We have been down this road before too. You say it is very plain. I don't think that passage is plain at all. It SEEMS plain at first reading, but the more you study it the less plain it becomes. I am sure we will continue to disagree on it, but when we get to heaven, I will get to say, "I told you so!" ;-) It is my belief that you changed your mind needlessly.
2 Thessalonians 2 King James Version (KJV)
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

Lamad, Let the same students read this passage and ask them when our gathering will take place. I'll not hold my breath waiting for you to respond on this one.
 
Upvote 0

Riberra

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2014
5,098
594
✟90,164.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
From post #90
How do you know this part you have highlighted is a lie?

Of course you never stopped to think that when Jesus is hidden in a cloud He would be invisible to those on the earth unless God opened their spiritual eyes. Since you deny His coming hidden in a cloud, and only see ONE
The scripture does not say that Jesus will be hidden.

Matthew 24:30
...and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
56
✟16,234.00
Faith
Christian
My comment

When Jesus appears visibly at the end of His coming judgment upon the earth all earth dwellers will see Him .... no doubt [Revelation 1:7]

But He will not be seen by the same during His period of judgment upon an unbelieving world .... [Psalms 2; Revelation 6:12-17]

Do you know RB that the Lord is present at this moment? .... you just cannot see Him

Do you know that He can appear and disappear at will?
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,624
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟102,371.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
The scripture does not say that Jesus will be hidden.

Matthew 24:30
...and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.


Anyone can quote a scripture:

"Then we who are alive, who are left, shall be taken up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ"

I guess when you see a plane flying and then entering a cloud, you can still see the plane, right through the cloud.
Where do you see any meeting in the air in Matthew 24:30?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,624
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟102,371.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
2 Thessalonians 2 King James Version (KJV)
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

Lamad, Let the same students read this passage and ask them when our gathering will take place. I'll not hold my breath waiting for you to respond on this one.

No, don't hold your breath.
 
Upvote 0