- Nov 3, 2004
- 31,716
- 1,425
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
But why are you getting personal with this?Actually, it's frightening that you keep spewing this nonsense when it's been debunked many times over.
Not that evidence or logic is all that important to "truthers".
You are aware there was wreckage of an airliner and thousands of pounds of jet fuel in there, right?
The fires weren't long lasting. Most of jet fuel burned outside at the impact - you saw the explosion flames outside. The building itself was producing billows of black smoke - low oxygen.
But it was not a massive hole. The closeup showed some beams knocked out and clearly no raging flames before the collapse.There was a massive hole in the building from a catastrophic impact, combined with massive fire damage. I don't see how you can't comprehend that would significantly weaken the structural integrity of the building.
Also, remember that poor redheaded woman who was waving her hand from that hole? That was all over TV at the time.
Upvote
0