Repeatedly? Were you there as a witness, or did you get the word repeatedly from the killer. The wounds and required treatment were not consistent with a 'repeated' bashing of the head on concrete.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Dear George Zimmerman
- Thread starter Swim411
- Start date
- Status
Nope. It never happens. And I gave you all of human history to find ONE example where it did.
And you produced an emotional response sans evidence.
Upvote
0
Well, then it is a good thing that there is ZERO evidence that Zimmerman's head was slammed into the concrete even once.
Upvote
0
Why would I care to explain it as it relates to what I said. If you have any real evidence that Martin 'repeatedly' slammed Zimmerman's head into the concrete, then bring it forth.
Upvote
0
Zimmerman must be proven guilty. He does not have to prove his innocence nor does he have to prove he acted in self defense.
Upvote
0
For all we know, Zimmerman slammed his own head on the concrete after he slipped on the wet grass while grabbing at Martin.
Upvote
0
- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,977
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Swim,
The trial's over. Evidence/testimony was presented. The jury decided. Zimmerman was acquitted. Interest is fading. Time to move on.
Upvote
0
Don't you read and follow the discussions? My points were quite clear. If you no longer want to discuss this topic, nobody is stopping you from leaving the thread in search of more current topics.
Upvote
0
Of course I do. I'm arguing Zimmerman has no obligation to prove his innocence. Anyone involved in a self defense shooting should never face arrest or detention. They should simply be able to carry on with their lives.
Upvote
0
And I am arguing that there is no witness that saw Martin 'repeatedly' bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete. If you want to address my argument then challenge it with some facts.
Upvote
0
Then move on. The trial isn't over the stand your ground law and the systemic racism of Florida's justice system is very much on trial still.
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
