I asked for EM fields
in nature. As the article states,
"Find out how scientists use magnetic fields... ".
Also, did you provide this link for comedic effect?
"Ghost hunters will sometimes say the reverse - that ghosts cause a high electromagnetic field, or sometimes that a high electromagnetic field will allow ghosts to appear. Nobody is sure, yet, what these fields do to ghost brain DNA."
Ghost brain DNA? 
Do you ever read these articles you link to?
Actually I didn't read that one.
I supposed I deserved that.
Electrocution is not 'death by EM field'.
You have a strange sense of "cause/effect" relationships. Without the electrical current flowing through them, would they have died?
I expect that many do not expect empirical evidence for their particular god, as they do not have empirical evidence, and a vast, intricate rational gets developed to explain its absence.
FYI, that same "intricate rational" was developed to explain the absence of cosmological inflation on Earth, the effects of dark energy on Earth, the failures of SUSY theories/hypothesis at LHC, etc.
No, that's *your* homework. Provide a falsifiable hypothesis for this "God" that you posit.
You could demonstrate that the universe that we live inside of is not "electric". That is essentially the "mainstream" position by the way.
You seem intent on burning all stamps with the word "God" on them, yet you ignore all the dark energy stamps, the inflation stamps, the exotic matter stamps, etc. What's up with that double standard?
Well, the word "God" does appear to carry a lot more baggage for people than any terms involved with cosmology. Extraordinary claims, and all that.
It's an extraordinary claim that dark energy even exists in nature, and an additional extraordinary claim that it has a tangible effect on photons too.
Inflation theory makes no claim about what you should or should not being doing in your bedroom, and with whom, for example.
Inflation theory does make claims about where my tax dollars should be spent in terms of the "science" money that is dedicated toward cosmology theory however. That part is the part I find offensive and the part I take exception to.
How would one falsify your pantheistic god? Or your Christian God?
You could start by demonstrating that the universe isn't electric in nature, and electrically active like a brain.
Are you now moving the goalposts from EM fields to electrical current?
ELECTROmagnetic fields include current. In fact, magnetic fields are a direct result of the movement of charged particles, even in solid magnets.
The "God helmet" does not replicate EM fields as found in nature.
How do you know that?
You said "An electric universe would definitely be able to have an EM influence on humans".
Show me an experiment the replicates the EM fields found in nature, and the measured effects - the influence - they have on the human brain.
You'll have to define "found in nature" for me because apparently what you think is found in nature and what I think is found in nature are two entirely different things.
The goalposts have not moved. It only looks that way from your ever-changing position.
No, you're definitely moving them. You seem only intent on focusing on a theory related to God, specifically one that involves an "electric God" that uses EM fields in terms of his physical manifestations.
You seem unwilling and/or unable to "compare" one cosmology concept to another in terms of "act of faith" required in each theory. Why? If we're going to be completely honest, we can't apply two different standards to two different cosmology "beliefs".
I'm not ascribing anything to the universe that isn't also found here on Earth in great abundance, including EM fields and awareness. Apparently you seem to think there is some sort of scientific disconnect between awareness and EM fields? I'm not seeing a valid objection here yet, just you dragging your feet over the physical effects of EM fields on the human brain. Is that your basic "beef" with a panetheistic/electric universe theory?
