• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

medical students boycotting lectures on evolution

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟109,603.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Bishop Ussher did use a lot of extra sources. But really anyone can do the geneology from Adam to Abraham. The only thing required is to accept that Noah was 600 years old at the time of the flood. There does not seem to be any scientific evidence that people can live to be 1,000 years of age. Of course there is no scientific evidence that they did not live that long. IT is pretty much a standoff.

It is quite simple to add up the dates to about Jacob, then you have to do some interpreting of other clues in the Bible to get a little further than that. Eventually, you have to use extra-Biblical sources.

But the whole discussion started because Split Rock, Loudmouth, and Wiccanchild said that there was some interpretation involved (as opposed to being inspired) in Ussher's chronology and that it was potentially untrustworthy, to which AV rebutted that Ussher only had to count. Surely, he could do that, right?

AV was asserting that we could independently verify Ussher's findings with simple arithmetic. When he was shown that you couldn't, he claimed that is not what he meant, but that we also had to combine it with secular Egyptian sources.

I think your missing the big picture here. You have 7,000 years before Adam shows up in the Garden of Eden. We can mark the beginning of this era using the Nanodiamond layer found on the Greenland Ice core samples. They have that at 12,900. I use the date 12,982 years. Then you have Adam 6,000 years ago. Abraham 4,000 years ago. David and the temple in Jerusalem 3,000 years ago. Jesus 2,000 years ago. Then I use the date we get from NASA of April 13, 2029 and April 13, 2036 as the end of this age or era. So there is a lot more involved in dispensationalism then just when Adam was born. You also have the 2,000 year church age, you have the 1,000 year reign of Christ. Then of course you have the OT dispensations also.

If you go through the Bible and read EVERY passage that talks about the third day. OR if you read every passage in the Bible that talks about the seventh day, THEN it will all start to make sense. Even people have written books about the third day. I have read two different books written on all the passages in the Bible that talks about the third day.

No, you are missing my point. I was not arguing whether or not Ussher's chronology reflects an accurate model. My argument was merely against AV's proposal that all we had to do to independently verify his model, was to add the dates up...and against the fact that he claimed to have done it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Anyone here remember JohnR7, he said the Hong Kong airport proved the Bible right about a mountain casting itself into the sea, because of earthworks

Oh we remember him very well. Now he uses another name, Jamin4422.
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2005
6,032
116
46
✟6,911.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
AV was asserting that we could independently verify Ussher's findings with simple arithmetic. When he was shown that you couldn't, he claimed that is not what he meant, but that we also had to combine it with secular Egyptian sources.

Oh, linky please?
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟109,603.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Oh, linky please?

First several posts of this thread:

http://www.christianforums.com/t7704938/

It should be noted that he also failed to link any Egyptian source with the Biblical genealogy. Essentially his point was, when he got to Judah, well, the Bible talks about the Egyptian empire, and the Egyptian empire existed at that time (that time being calculated from the assumed 4004BC creation date), so they link.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Oh we remember him very well. Now he uses another name, Jamin4422.
...
...
...
MINDBLOWN.jpeg
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
...
...
...
MINDBLOWN.jpeg

LOL :D:D Just compare the posts. Same ideas, same grammatical errors, "Jamin" even jumped up to defend "John" in some threads after John magically disappeared. By the way, they are the same as Jazer too.
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You don't even have a point. You really think that because the word in the Bible sounds a bit like a modern English word that it must mean exactly the same thing? Come on! That's some of the poorest reasoning I've ever heard. You haven't even attempted to show that your reasoning is sound!

This is a further example of deliberately being obtuse. Strawman # 3,722 that I've seen on CF, today ...
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
LOL :D:D Just compare the posts. Same ideas, same grammatical errors, "Jamin" even jumped up to defend "John" in some threads after John magically disappeared. By the way, they are the same as Jazer too.
I remember Juvennisun, then Jazer, then Jamin. JohnR7 may well be the original. It's like a bloody hydra!
 
Upvote 0

Blackwater Babe

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
7,093
246
United States
✟8,940.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Libertarian
I remember Juvennisun, then Jazer, then Jamin. JohnR7 may well be the original. It's like a bloody hydra!
What a fitting simile! Yes, and like the hydra, when you demolish the PRATT of one, another will come back with the exact same PRATT a week later
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,857
7,881
65
Massachusetts
✟396,958.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I remember Juvennisun, then Jazer, then Jamin. JohnR7 may well be the original. It's like a bloody hydra!
Juvennisun is a different entity, I believe. Geology is his thing, rather than agriculture, Adam and Eve and haplotypes.
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟109,603.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Juvennisun is a different entity, I believe. Geology is his thing, rather than agriculture, Adam and Eve and haplotypes.

Agreed. Plus, their speech/grammar is completely different.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Juvennisun is a different entity, I believe. Geology is his thing, rather than agriculture, Adam and Eve and haplotypes.
Hmm, perhaps, perhaps. Is anyone willing to do a longitudinal study of their collective posts?
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2005
6,032
116
46
✟6,911.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
This is a further example of deliberately being obtuse. Strawman # 3,722 that I've seen on CF, today ...

Then why don't you put your moneey where your mouth is and show us that the word used in the ancient Greek manuscripts of the biblical texts actually meant "small stick of an explosive nature."
 
Upvote 0