There is no "covered' in my mind. It is a fact that .....
....RC is incapable of citing references outside of himself on almost every topic in dispute. I wonder why that is?
How about Hubble's assertion? Are you ignorant of Hubble's papers about tired light?There is your assertion. There is Ashmore's assertion.
Maybe because he understands that photons do have kinetic energy and it is related to photon redshift for starters? Maybe because you know absolutely nothing about it?Why should I believe a random person with a web page (Ashmore)?
I've already accepted the fact that there is 'missing mass' and you've yet to demonstrate that any of that missing mass is exotic in nature. When can I expect you to do that in a real lab?Why should I believe someone who cannot address the strong evidence for dark matter
Holushko killed your dark energy entity dead. What a pity that your impotent on Earth dark energy entity never shows up in a lab.and dark energy
It's around 4600 degrees hotter than the surface. Then again the upper chromosphere is about 14,000 Kelvin hotter than the photosphere.(or who does not even know the temperature of the Sun's photosphere !)?
Bwahahahahahahahaha! Your dark energy deity vanishes at *all* densities!To make your assertions into evidence you or Ashmore will have to show that the redshift in Chen's experiment
- does not vanish at lighter densities.
The rest of your nonsense has already been dealt with by Holushko, Ashmore, Brynjolfsson, and many other tired light proponents. It's a pity that Ned Wright has never updated his website since at least 2006 when Lerner falsified his claims about the Tolman test. If an unpublished website that makes no mention of any "modern" tired light theory is the best you've got, you've literally got nothing. You can't even tell us where you invisible dark energy from comes from. You've got an impotent on Earth invisible friend in your pocket apparently.
So sayeth some guy in 1929 who never heard of Chen, or Stark redshift and Ned Wright who apparently knows nothing more than the guy from 1929. Wow, what a pity.They blur distant objects.
That is because there isn't any. It does "predict" signal broadening and plasma redshift which are in fact observed, not time dilation.The tired light model does not predict the observed time dilation of high redshift supernova light curves
Laughable nonsense since Penrose pointed out that it is 10 to the 100th power less likely that our flat universe has *anything* whatsoever to do with inflation than it happened without inflation. Talk about incredible coincidences! 10 to the 100th power isn't just a coincidence, it's a miracle!The tired light model can not produce a blackbody spectrum for the Cosmic Microwave Background without some incredible coincidences.
False as Lerner's paper from 2006 demonstrated.The tired light model fails the Tolman surface brightness test
That's because objects that are older than that are *said* to be no older than 15Gyrs due to magical inflation and faster than light speed expansion mythologies.Tired light cannot explain why no object older than ~15 Gyrs has ever been found.
Maybe. Maybe not. I'll wait for the James Webb telescope to decide that issue.Galaxies at high redshift look different than today.
Again, maybe, maybe not. So what? That could be related to the amount of current traversing our visible sliver of the universe at the moment for all I know.The cosmic star formation rate changes as a function of time
So what? That plasma around our galaxy is *much* hotter, with more free electrons per pound of plasma, than anything Chen played with in the lab. There's also a lot more of that plasma than Chen ever played with in a lab.Effects induced by lasers and in dense plasmas tend to be nonlinear: Effects dense plasmas nonlinear
And I better add - in my limited experience as a solid state physicist!
They are at the furthest limits of our visible universe since objects cannot expand at faster than the speed of light and it takes time for light to reach Earth. Anything and everything you think is 15 billion light years away is older than 15 billion years old.ETA: Michael: Where are the older than ~15 Gyrs objects in the pc universe?
Last edited:
Upvote
0