The best evidence for Creationism

[AV1611VET]

The lack of respect for a book you consider as holy is amazing. But your lack of respect for other cultures is really close to racism.

I beg your pardon!?

 

[selfinflikted]

Why would you expect the Creator to be limited by the laws He created?

Who created the creator?

 

[AV1611VET]

He's a KJVO...

That's right.

A lot of people don't understand how a KJVO operates, and it shows in their expectations of me.

They expect me to address their points when they appeal to another language, thinking they've made a point against me, and it doesn't work.

Instead, they get a lesson in KJVO, and end up going straight to vent & ridicule without passing GO.

 

[selfinflikted]

That's right.

A lot of people don't understand how a KJVO operates, and it shows in their expectations of me.

They expect me to address their points when they appeal to another language, thinking they've made a point against me, and it doesn't work.

Instead, they get a lesson in KJVO, and end up going straight to vent & ridicule without passing GO.

Well, considering the original language in the garden was English, I'd say you picked the correct version, right?

 

[AV1611VET]

Well, considering the original language in the garden was English, I'd say you picked the correct version, right?

When there's only one Version, it's hard not to.

The others are just translations.

 

[driewerf]

I beg your pardon!?

The lack of respect shown in your post is in my opinion very close to racism.

 

[AV1611VET]

The lack of respect shown in your post is in my opinion very close to racism.

I'm not going to dignify this with a response; other than to say I'll assume it's just another false accusation to add to the [long] list.

 

[Split Rock]

Why would you expect the Creator to be limited by the laws He created?

Why would you expect the Creator to violate the very laws He created?

 

[Split Rock]

I have noticed that they have an amazing ability to get stuck on things that have nothing at all to do with the Bible. It just confirms the fact that everyone knows deep down inside of them what is true. Because sometimes they have an amazing ability to avoid the truth. To try and deny that they know the truth will not help them any.

You just did a good job describing many creationists here.

They will be held accountable, no matter how much they try to deny the truth.

And there's the Big Creationist Stick we have all come to love!

 

[AV1611VET]

Why would you expect the Creator to violate the very laws He created?

Mark 2:27 And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:

 

[Split Rock]

Mark 2:27 And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:

But indeed, that is a proscriptive law made for mankind to follow. We are talking about the physical laws of the universe, which are descriptive, not proscriptive. From a Christian point of view, the laws of the universe were created by God to allow the universe to function as God intended it to function. Why would he ever need or even desire to muck with them? Only if he were NOT all-knowing and all-powerful (e.g. a man) would he need to fiddle with them.

 

[AV1611VET]

But indeed, that is a proscriptive law made for mankind to follow. We are talking about the physical laws of the universe, which are descriptive, not proscriptive.

So changing descriptions with every other new discovery is considered having the truth?

 

[Davian]

Still nothing on *how* it was done. Try again. Show how it has more explanatory power than the mainstream scientific theories. Hint: you will need to show your familiarity with those theories for this to make any sense.

Creatio ex nihilo & creatio ex materia.

Did you think that altering my post to change its intent would lend substance to your response?

 

[Split Rock]

So changing descriptions with every other new discovery is considered having the truth?

Would you consider clinging to old, out-dated and/or falsified descriptions closer to the truth?

 

[TerraIncognita]

So changing descriptions with every other new discovery is considered having the truth?

Anytime knowledge improves our understanding of reality, then yes. I'm sorry your belief paradigm does not allow for this. Not to worry though, fortunately we have millions of dedicated people working on improving our understanding of reality.

 

[AV1611VET]

Would you consider clinging to old, out-dated and/or falsified descriptions closer to the truth?

Closer to the truth ≠ having the truth.

 

[RickG]

Closer to the truth ≠ having the truth.

Beats sticking ones' head in the sand and not accepting new information when it becomes available.

 

[AV1611VET]

Beats sticking ones' head in the sand and not accepting new information when it becomes available.

QV please:

In reading about entropy just now (symbolized by the letter H), I came across this definition:

A measure of the loss of information in a transmitted message.
​

Thus I would like to submit this as the equation for the entropy of the Bible:

• ΔH(Bible)=0

In English, it simply states that the change [Δ] in the entropy [H] of the Bible equals zero.

Put another way, there is no change in the loss of information in the Bible.

The Telephone Game, which relies on entropy, does not apply.

 

[mathetes123]

Why would you expect the Creator to violate the very laws He created?

I said why would God be limited by the laws He created. Having created the universe and the
Laws which govern it, he is not subject to His creation.

 

[mathetes123]

Therefore, there cannot be a Creator.

Therefore, there cannot be a Creator.

The creator is not subject to or limited by the very laws which He created.