Universe is not homogeneous as far as we know

[sandwiches]

Show us what claim, and what supports it? Then we can check your work Till then, cork er.

So, you need to check the work because you DON'T KNOW that the claims are wrong. Now, we're making progress.

 

[dad]

It's your job you to prove that it's always been the same. Just like, according to you, it's our job to prove that the laws of the universe have always been the same.

Only if the point is to get you to believe in it. My point is not that. That is a given. (or not)

I have enough proof of God and His word so that I know it is real, and proven. I looked at prophesies, and many things.

Now, it's your job you to prove that our laws have always been the same if you want to pulpit pound science here. Simple.

 

[dad]

So, you need to check the work because you DON'T KNOW that the claims are wrong. Now, we're making progress.

Check 'the work'? Check out the cosmic ladder. It will no more get you to the stars than to Jack in the Beanstalk. I checked it.

 

[sandwiches]

Check 'the work'? Check out the cosmic ladder. It will no more get you to the stars than to Jack in the Beanstalk. I checked it.

"[T]o Jack in the Beanstalk?" What is this... I don't even... Maybe someone who speaks your language know what you meant there.

Whatever... At least we got you to admit that you don't know how or why the claims of science regarding the distant past or distant galaxies are wrong.

 

[dad]

"[T]o Jack in the Beanstalk?" What is this... I don't even... Maybe someone who speaks your language know what you meant there.

A fable. Like the fables about the stars that have been falsely called science. A young boy found this fast growing vine or tree, and climbed way way up, where he found the mean giant, if I recall.

No one really climbed the beanstalk, and the cosmic ladder leads nowhere. I do not even believe that the distance to the closest star is known! I used to, but the more I look into it, the more obvious it becomes that they are foolish dreamers.

Radar is in man's range, so it works for near space. Man's seismic waves do not work for the interior of the earth. They pass through, some of them, yes, and some do not, but for reasons they do not really know. (they assume what can't be passed through is liquid)

 

[Nathan Poe]

A fable. Like the fables about the stars that have been falsely called science. A young boy found this fast growing vine or tree, and climbed way way up, where he found the mean giant, if I recall.

A mean giant sitting in a flying sapphire throne?

No one really climbed the beanstalk, and the cosmic ladder leads nowhere. I do not even believe that the distance to the closest star is known! I used to, but the more I look into it, the more obvious it becomes that they are foolish dreamers.

Your beliefs are wrong -- as is the rest of your blather.

 

[dad]

A mean giant sitting in a flying sapphire throne?

No. That is one of the most reputable bits of observation ever recorded. Like maybe we ask you to vote on what is true??

 

[Nathan Poe]

No. That is one of the most reputable bits of observation ever recorded.

And this is why what you do and don't believe is dismissed as blather.

 

[dad]

And this is why what you do and don't believe is dismissed as blather.

When you dismiss Ezekiel, we'll look for hell to freeze over. Dream on.

 

[dad]

There is nothing to suggest that the laws of physics have ever changed.

There is lots to suggest that they never existed.

 

[sandwiches]

There is lots to suggest that they never existed.

Like what?

 

[SithDoughnut]

There is lots to suggest that they never existed.

Like?

 

[dad]

Like?

Like no proof that they did. Like the bible. Like history.

 

[sandwiches]

Like no proof that they did. Like the bible. Like history.

What piece of history shows this?

 

[dad]

What piece of history shows this?

You mean what piece shows present state laws? Not the pieces that have spirits as kings. Not the pieces that have long life spans.

 

[sandwiches]

You mean what piece shows present state laws? Not the pieces that have spirits as kings. Not the pieces that have long life spans.

What piece of history shows that the laws of nature were different in the past?

 

[dad]

What piece of history shows that the laws of nature were different in the past?

Spirit kings and long life spans of early records.

 

[sandwiches]

Spirit kings and long life spans of early records.

So, spirit kings lived and people had longer lifespans. What of it?

 

[dad]

So, spirit kings lived and people had longer lifespans. What of it?

I see no spirit kings or spirits marrying people here. Something had to be different. I see no one living many centuries here. Something had to be different.

 

[SithDoughnut]

I see no spirit kings or spirits marrying people here. Something had to be different. I see no one living many centuries here. Something had to be different.

And how do you get from "something" to "the entire universe"?