• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

My Enoch Challenge

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Would I ever lie to a pretty face -- even if it's scowling?

I think you have no qualms at all about lying -- to us, to yourself, to your own grandmother -- if you thought it would help you maintain your opinion of yourself.
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2005
6,032
116
46
✟6,911.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
No -- think about it.

Since it happened, yet there's no evidence for it; then if you're right, and it didn't happen, then there should be evidence for it -- otherwise, you're setting up a false dichotomy.

If there's no evidence that it happened, how do you know that it happened?

And if I am right and it never happened, why on earth do you think there'd be evidence of it? i've never gone sky diving. Do you think then that there is evidence of my jumping out of a plane?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,270
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If there's no evidence that it happened, how do you know that it happened?
Read my post again; viz., SINCE it happened...
And if I am right and it never happened...
You're not right, though.
... why on earth do you think there'd be evidence of it?
To complete the dichotomy.
i've never gone sky diving.
Nor have I.
Do you think then that there is evidence of my jumping out of a plane?
If you went skydiving in such a way as to leave no evidence, no.

Again, Enoch walked with God, and was not.

Genesis 5:24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

If you think evidence of this was left behind, please feel free to state what that evidence should be.
 
Upvote 0

VehementiDominus

Active Member
May 12, 2011
307
13
England
✟520.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
This thread has nothing to do with physical or life sciences.

Barely anything AV says has anything to do with physical and life sciences. He outright rejects science when it disagrees with his pre-concieved, irrational and frankly stupid ideas and interpretations of the Bible.

He's completely incapable of reason or logic or critical thought - staples of what science is. All he seems to do is spout nonsensical jibberish claiming it to be the "Truth". Nothing will ever change his mind or get him to break the brainwashing he's clearly suffered. He's trapped in the gravitational well of his own blind faith and gullibility, lacking the critical thinking skill neccessary to achieve escape velocity.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,270
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Barely anything AV says has anything to do with physical and life sciences. He outright rejects science when it disagrees with his pre-concieved, irrational and frankly stupid ideas and interpretations of the Bible.

He's completely incapable of reason or logic or critical thought - staples of what science is. All he seems to do is spout nonsensical jibberish claiming it to be the "Truth". Nothing will ever change his mind or get him to break the brainwashing he's clearly suffered. He's trapped in the gravitational well of his own blind faith and gullibility, lacking the critical thinking skill neccessary to achieve escape velocity.
:blush: -- awwww!
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,898
17,800
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟463,284.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Produce evidence that verifies this:

Genesis 5:24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

... or admit that there are things God did that didn't generate any.

So the bible's not evidence of it happening?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,270
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why is it when there is scientific evidence for the Bible people do not want to accept it?
Because someone can take it and use it against the Bible.

This is why I don't think God left physical evidence lying around everywhere.

God could have, for example, preserved Noah's Ark, but He didn't.

All it would take is for a scientist to conclude the Ark wasn't Noah's, and there goes the neighborhood.

A second reason, is because people would end up worshiping these items and not God.

Can anyone say: Nehushtan?
 
Upvote 0
J

Jazer

Guest
What evidence are you referring to?
Oh, I think the temple mount in Jerusalem is classical. There are people who claim there was no temple. Yet the foundation is still there. There are people who claim that there was no Jericho, yet science tells us that Jericho is the oldest city and the walls of Jericho that we learn about in Bible school as kids are still there and archeology has studied them. How many examples do you want of where people reject science when it shows the Bible is true? There are people who claim the Hebrews were never in Egypt, yet Archeology shows us the city they lived in and that they did make bricks.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Oh, I think the temple mount in Jerusalem is classical. There are people who claim there was no temple. Yet the foundation is still there. There are people who claim that there was no Jericho, yet science tells us that Jericho is the oldest city and the walls of Jericho that we learn about in Bible school as kids are still there and archeology has studied them. How many examples do you want of where people reject science when it shows the Bible is true? There are people who claim the Hebrews were never in Egypt, yet Archeology shows us the city they lived in and that they did make bricks.

In other words, it's easy to refute the claim that absolutely nothing that is mentioned in the Bible is based on anything in reality.A pity you will have to look pretty hard to find someone making a claim that foolish.

Of course, when you claim "the Bible is true," you're not referring to anything as mundane as the existence of a tmeple or a particular city, now are you?
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2005
6,032
116
46
✟6,911.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Read my post again; viz., SINCE it happened...

Ah, you just assume it happened.

You're not right, though.

As long as your untestable assumptions are right.

To complete the dichotomy.

Huh?

If you went skydiving in such a way as to leave no evidence, no.

You are contradicting yourself.

If there is no evidence for Event X, did Event X occur or did Event X not occur?

Again, Enoch walked with God, and was not.

Genesis 5:24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

If you think evidence of this was left behind, please feel free to state what that evidence should be.

Correction: we are told that Enoch walked with God, and was not. I can say that I went skydiving. Doesn't mean I actually did. So we must look to see if there is any independant evidence to support the claim being made. If the claim is made and there is no evidence to support it, why believe the claim?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,270
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If the claim is made and there is no evidence to support it, why believe the claim?
Because some can take that claim on faith.

If then, someone comes along and says Event-x didn't happen because there's no known evidence; the ball is in their court to show it didn't happen, UNLESS that person is going on faith that it didn't happen as well.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Because some can take that claim on faith.

And depending on the claim, "taking it on faith" has the potential to be a profoundly stupid decision.

A claim such as this one is insignificant, however -- if you want to believe that Enoch was lifted up to heaven by God for being an exceptionally righteous man, that's your business.

Why you'd want us to provide evidence for it speaks to the weakness of your faith, nothing more.


If then, someone comes along and says Event-x didn't happen because there's no known evidence; the ball is in their court to show it didn't happen, UNLESS that person is going on faith that it didn't happen as well.

So as a matter of faith, it did happen and it didn't. It's Schrodinger's Enoch.
 
Upvote 0