OMGoodness!!! Look what I just found!!! It's amazing to me that there are people and proofs out there which EXACTLY confirm my beliefs (well, some of them).
While some of it's contents contradicts other things I disagree with such as the age of man, FOR THIS THREAD it proves EXACTLY what I have suggested and adhered to in many of my posts. With subsequent posters denying my assertions and accusing me of lying and trying to bring disdain upon "Scienceville." I submit to you proof of my suspicions. I highlight and capitalize my points.
Article #2 - Exposing a Scientific Coverup
Excerpts and web address follows:
" In 1966 respected archeologist Virginia Steen-McIntyre and her associates on a U.S. Geological Survey team working under a grant from the National Science Foundation were called upon to date a pair of remarkable archeological sites in Mexico. Sophisticated stone tools rivaling the best work of Cro-magnon man in Europe had been discovered at Hueyatlaco, while somewhat cruder implements had been turned up at nearby El Horno. The sites, it was conjectured, were very ancient, perhaps as old as 20,000 years, which, according to prevailing theories, would place them very close to the dawn of human habitation in the Americas.
Steen-McIntyre, knowing that if such antiquity could indeed be authenticated, her career would be made, set about an exhaustive series of tests. Using four different, but well accepted, dating methods, including uranium series and fission track, she determined to get it right. Nevertheless, when the results came in, the original estimates proved to be way off. Way under as it turned out. The actual age was conclusively demonstrated to be more like a quarter of a million years.
As we might expect, some controversy ensued.
Steen-McIntyre's date
challenged not only ACCEPTED chronologies for human presence in the region,
but contradicted ESTABLISHED notions of how long modern humans could have been anywhere on Earth. Nevertheless,
the massive reexamination of ORTHODOX theory and the wholesale rewriting of textbooks which one might logically have expected DID NOT ENSUE. What did follow was the
PUBLIC RIDICULE of Steen-McIntyre's work and the VILIFICATION of her character. She has NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND WORK IN HER FIELD SINCE.
More than a century earlier, following the discovery of gold in California's Table Mountain and the subsequent digging of thousands of feet of mining shafts, miners began to bring up hundreds of stone artifacts and even human fossils. Despite their origin in geological strata documented at 9 to 55 million years in age, California state geologist J. D. Whitney was able subsequently to authenticate many of the finds and to produce an extensive and authoritative report.
The implications of Whitney's evidence have never been properly answered or explained by the establishment, yet
the entire episode has been VIRTUALLY IGNORED and references to it have VANISHED FROM the textbooks.
For decades miners in South Africa have been turning up from strata nearly three billion years in age hundreds of small metallic spheres with encircling parallel grooves.
Thus far, the scientific community has failed to take note.
Among
scores of such cases cited in the recently published Forbidden Archeology (and in the condensed version The Hidden History of the Human Race)
it is clear that these three are by no means uncommon. Suggesting nothing less than a massive cover-up, co-authors Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson believe that
when it comes to explaining the origins of the human race on earth, academic science has cooked the books.
While the public may believe that all the real evidence supports the mainstream theory of evolution with its familiar timetable for human development (i.e., Homo Sapiens of the modern type going back to only about 100,000 years) Cremo and Thompson demonstrate that,
to the contrary, a virtual MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE produced by REPUTABLE scientists applying standards just as exacting, if not more so, than the establishment has been not only IGNORED but, in many cases, ACTUALLY SUPRESSED.
In EVERY area of research, from paleontology to anthropology and archeology,
that which is presented to the public as established and irrefutable fact is indeed nothing more, says Cremo, THAN A CONCENSUS arrived at by POWERFUL GROUPS OF PEOPLE.
Is that consensus justified by the evidence? Cremo and Thompson say no.
Carefully citing all available documentation, the authors produce case after case of contradictory research conducted in the last two centuries.
Included are detailed descriptions of the controversy and ultimate suppression following each discovery. Typical is the case of George Carter who claimed to have found, at an excavation in San Diego, hearths and crude stone tools at levels corresponding to the last interglacial period, some 80,000-90,000 years ago. Even though Carter's work was endorsed by some experts such as lithic scholar John Witthoft, the establishment scoffed.
San Diego State University REFUSED to even look at the evidence in its own back yard and
Harvard University PUBLICLY DEFAMED HIM in a course on Fantastic Archeology.
What emerges is a picture of an ARROGANT and BIGOTED academic ELITE interested more in the PRESERVATION of its OWN PREROGATIVES and authority than the truth. "
Exposing A Scientific Coverup
This encapsulates all that I have been saying and everyone has been denying for years on this forum.
first publication, so I'll make it a good 'un 
