Intelligent design theory asserts that the intelligence which created the universe did so with a goal in mind, namely of creating the universe such that a race of sentient beings (us) could inhabit it, though the precise phrasing of the idea varies a bit from on proponent to the next. All of the features of the universes that I mentioned are necessary for us to exist. With no matter in the universe, we would not exist. With no movement in the universe, we would not exist. With no regularity or no physical laws, we would not exist.
I've just answered.
You have probably heard of the sentence "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously"? It was coined as an example of a sentence that is grammatically well-formed (and even nice sounding if your wish), yet semantically meaningless and void. So, just because you can come up with something that superficially forms a sentence or so, it does not mean in a long shot that you are actually expressing something meaningful.
And this is just one thing, which presumes that you are even superficially giving the appearance of explaining things. I debate that in the case of your first paragraph. There is nothing, which even on the surface passes muster as explanation for why - what was it again? - the universe should have matter, etc, if it was created "thinkingly" (what ever that means anyway).
Giving good explanations, firstly involves hard, really hard, work, and secondly should not be confused with empty blah, blah.
(Sorry, if that sounds a little harsh, but there you go.)
Generally it's not such a good idea to ask a question and then declare that your opponent has no answer in the same post.
I agree. However, you are not my opponent, strictly speaking. The story is more complex that just "me vs you". It is rather, "me, and what I have seen, heard, read throughout all these years about ID, Creationism, Theology, blah." And yes, [null] expresses very well the amount of content, when it comes to ID and explanations to *stuff*.