Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
How far is this line of questioning going to descend?
To the very depths of Hell, if we SATAN-followers have our way....... hahahahahhahaha!!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How far is this line of questioning going to descend?
How far is this line of questioning going to descend?
Yes, but Y-Adam and mt-Eve are very special kinds of ancestors. Neither of them is actually the last common ancestor of humanity. They are merely last common ancestors in whom all paternal/maternal lines meet. Identifying them ignores all other ways of tracing ancestry. (Which is why they are also horribly misnamed)If God, Himself, said He used evolution to make Adam & Eve, then obviously the definition of evolution as used by "higher" academia is wrong.
Evolution does not allow for Adam & Eve to coexist as our first parents.
In fact, y-Adam and mtDNA Eve lived, if my memory serves me correctly, thousands of years apart?
However you cut it, in evolutionary philosophy, there is no such thing as Adam & Eve being our first parents.The true last common ancestor (the latest person ancestral to all living humans) had to have a partner, because humans are not very good at reproducing asexually. There's your Adam and Eve, if you must have them.
Genesis 3:20 ¶ And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.That's ok, the bible doesn't say they were.
Adam Clarke's Commentary said:It is probable that God designed by this name to teach our first parents these two important truths:
It's a METAPHOR, AV. a METAPHOR. It symbolizes the origins of humans. It would be impossible for us to have our current genetic diversity if we all came from two people 6,000 years ago. Why does everything have to be literal?
Which has nothing to do with Darwinism and literally means that man was created as man.It's a METAPHOR, AV. a METAPHOR. It symbolizes the origins of humans. It would be impossible for us to have our current genetic diversity if we all came from two people 6,000 years ago. Why does everything have to be literal?
Including hippos and giraffes? They are living too. Gen 6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark.Genesis 3:20 ¶ And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
It's a pretty poor metaphor then, wouldn't you agree?It's a METAPHOR, AV. a METAPHOR. It symbolizes the origins of humans.
Nice try.Including hippos and giraffes? They are living too. Gen 6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the ark.
Well if you want to take it figuratively and all that...Hey, it doesn't say mother of every human being, but mother of all living. I mean if you want to take Genesis literally and all that.
It's a pretty poor metaphor then, wouldn't you agree?
The order is all wrong.
Then who is "God" in this metaphor you guys call Genesis 1?If it's meant to convey a moral teaching or story, it doesn't matter if the details are wrong.
Then who is "God" in this metaphor you guys call Genesis 1?
It really is just too hard for you to figure out.. isn't it? As I have been saying here for a while, Bible literalists are literalsts because otherwise figuring out the Bible would be too difficult for them.Then who is "God" in this metaphor you guys call Genesis 1?