Proposition 8 overturned in California

[sbvera13]

The Gay ... Agenda?

I was not aware of such nefarious shenanigans taking root.

Is it something like this?


The Gay Agenda for 8/05/2010

1. Call meeting to order.

2. Read minutes from 7/05/2010
a. Motion to accept minutes.

3. President's Minute

4. Treasurer's Report
a. Motion to accept proposed budget for 8/05/2010 to 9/05/2010

5. Review of Gay by-laws.
a. Subsequent to last month's complaint that the organization's decision-making procedures were not readily apparent to outsiders, we will be reviewing the by-laws with the intent of clarifying these issues. A vote will be called on any revisions at the 9/05/2010 meeting.

6. Assault on heterosexual marriage.
a. Due to last month's failed armed assault on the Institution of Marriage due to an inability to locate any such building, we will be taking ideas from the floor regarding a change in focus.

7. Open Commentary

8. Closure of meeting.

 

[onemorequestion]

Originally Posted by onemorequestion

Judge Walker is Gay.

Talk about walking into the Lions den for the defendants.

If he was a "Born Again" Christian and decided to uphold the will of the majority in California, there would be a mass demonstration of such anger as has not been seen since Prop 8 passed.

The Gay Agenda once again has its foundation in reality.

True Alinskyite Judge Walker. By any means necessary.

Christians have no chance against such devious people.
​

So are you implying that his orientation was the deciding factor and not the well reasoned position that Prop 8 denied equal protection under the law?

Implying? Recuse should have been the only moral decision this man made in the case. But morality is not the issue. Gay Rights are.

The arguments offered in favor of Prop 8 were very poor.

To redefine marriage for same gender couples, there should have never been a chalenge to that. It is absurd to equate same gender couples to a husband and a wife.

Mommies, where's my daddy?

It's horricfic. But its fascinating watching this abomination take shape as described in the Bible.

 

[Mling]

Is it something like this?


The Gay Agenda for 8/05/2010

1. Call meeting to order.

2. Read minutes from 7/05/2010
a. Motion to accept minutes.

3. President's Minute

4. Treasurer's Report
a. Motion to accept proposed budget for 8/05/2010 to 9/05/2010

5. Review of Gay by-laws.
a. Subsequent to last month's complaint that the organization's decision-making procedures were not readily apparent to outsiders, we will be reviewing the by-laws with the intent of clarifying these issues. A vote will be called on any revisions at the 9/05/2010 meeting.

6. Assault on heterosexual marriage.
a. Due to last month's failed armed assault on the Institution of Marriage due to an inability to locate any such building, we will be taking ideas from the floor regarding a change in focus.

You forgot to mention the cookie break. The queens get so cranky when we skip the cookie break.

 

[Jase]

Not exactly. David and Jonathan may have been bisexuals (although having children doesn't mean one isn't homosexual) but their relationship with each other would be a homosexual relationship.

One that was approved of Biblically.

One could also argue that Ruth and Naomi had a unusually close relationship, considering Ruth said she loved Naomi, and the Hebrew words used were the same as Adam's love for Eve.

 

[Cabal]

It's not easy getting internet connection from the bottom of an evil reality warping lake, you know.

Try shining your torch on it. It's the new holy water.

 

[Dogstar]

Is it something like this?


The Gay Agenda for 8/05/2010

1. Call meeting to order.

2. Read minutes from 7/05/2010
a. Motion to accept minutes.

3. President's Minute

4. Treasurer's Report
a. Motion to accept proposed budget for 8/05/2010 to 9/05/2010

5. Review of Gay by-laws.
a. Subsequent to last month's complaint that the organization's decision-making procedures were not readily apparent to outsiders, we will be reviewing the by-laws with the intent of clarifying these issues. A vote will be called on any revisions at the 9/05/2010 meeting.

6. Assault on heterosexual marriage.
a. Due to last month's failed armed assault on the Institution of Marriage due to an inability to locate any such building, we will be taking ideas from the floor regarding a change in focus.

7. Open Commentary

8. Closure of meeting.

Oh well that doesn't sound so bad.

When I saw the capital "A" in Agenda, I thought immediately of levels of evil approaching that of international organized crime, and was immediately afraid for my life of some sort of Gay Mafia, deviant nogoodniks organizing merciless drive-by makeovers under cover of night.

 

[BigBadWlf]

To redefine marriage for same gender couples, there should have never been a chalenge to that. It is absurd to equate same gender couples to a husband and a wife.

Just like it’s absurd to claim an interracial couple is equal to a “racially pure” couple…yet the courts did just that

Mommies, where's my daddy?

I checked in on it and the neighbor girls have never once asked that of their mothers

 

[Cabal]

Is it something like this?


The Gay Agenda for 8/05/2010

1. Call meeting to order.

2. Read minutes from 7/05/2010
a. Motion to accept minutes.

3. President's Minute

4. Treasurer's Report
a. Motion to accept proposed budget for 8/05/2010 to 9/05/2010

5. Review of Gay by-laws.
a. Subsequent to last month's complaint that the organization's decision-making procedures were not readily apparent to outsiders, we will be reviewing the by-laws with the intent of clarifying these issues. A vote will be called on any revisions at the 9/05/2010 meeting.

6. Assault on heterosexual marriage.
a. Due to last month's failed armed assault on the Institution of Marriage due to an inability to locate any such building, we will be taking ideas from the floor regarding a change in focus.

7. Open Commentary

8. Closure of meeting.

Hardly. No mention of the big gay recruitment drive, not to mention the lack of FABULOUS.

 

[Jase]

Oh well that doesn't sound so bad.

When I saw the capital "A" in Agenda, I thought immediately of levels of evil approaching that of international organized crime, and was immediately afraid for my life of some sort of Gay Mafia, deviant nogoodniks organizing merciless drive-by makeovers under cover of night.

Honestly, America could use some drivey-by makeovers! Whoever thought orange was the new pink, was seriously disturbed.

 

[onemorequestion]

One could also argue that Ruth and Naomi had a unusually close relationship, considering Ruth said she loved Naomi, and the Hebrew words used were the same as Adam's love for Eve.

Ah, the absurdity of gay theology. Now its incestuous lesbiansim.

Oh but wait, Naomi made sure Ruth married a good MAN.

In context.

You have no chance against me Jase.

 

[onemorequestion]

Just like it’s absurd to claim an interracial couple is equal to a “racially pure” couple…yet the courts did just that

Male and female humans right? All anatomy and physiology in place Jase.

I checked in on it and the neighbor girls have never once asked that of their mothers

An incredible statement for how debauched the times are in which we live. I absolutely believe you this time.

 

[Dogstar]

Honestly, America could use some drivey-by makeovers! Whoever thought orange was the new pink, was seriously disturbed.

Oh, sure, you say that now, but it's a slippery slope, my friend. Before you know it, we'll all be wearing our pants rolled up at the cuffs and shoes without socks, riding Vespas and smoking exceedingly thin cigarettes.

Oh, wait ... I think I'm getting my stereotypes mixed-up again. But I supposed that's what happens when they're all so ridiculously baseless.

 

[Mling]

Ah, the absurdity of gay theology.

Ah, the obviousness of bigotry. There is no gay theology. Gay people don't all think alike, and gay people don't all arrive at the same conclusions regarding theology. Example: I firmly believe the story of Ruth and Naomi has no gay overtones at all.

 

[onemorequestion]

OMQ, are you familiar with the correlation between those who loudly criticize gays and homosexuality?

Oh pleeeeezzze. Not the closeted self-loathing gay guy routine?

You guys have a play book or something? The homogenized comebacks are incredible.

Ah yes The Gay Agenda. Page what, I don't remember.

 

[Dogstar]

Ah yes The Gay Agenda. Page what, I don't remember.

Since you seem so intent on citing from this particular work, I really must ask where I can get a copy. To better arm myself against the growing threat, obviously.

Remind me ... is it garlic or silver they are allergic to?

 

[onemorequestion]

So you do have a copy of the Gay Agenda? And have read it? Oh my.

It's like a sport, you can figure it out quickly. The plays all look the same after watching for a bit.

 

[Mling]

And let me guess? You don't use Rent Boys while in Europe either?

Ummmm....obviously not. Why would I?

 

[BigBadWlf]

Oh pleeeeezzze. Not the closeted self-loathing gay guy routine?

You guys have a play book or something? The homogenized comebacks are incredible.

Ah yes The Gay Agenda. Page what, I don't remember.

I want a copy of that …where do you get one?

 

[Dogstar]

It's like a sport, you can figure it out quickly. The plays all look the same after watching for a bit.

Then it can't be very much like curling because I gotta say, I still can't figure that out.

 

[SithDoughnut]

It's like a sport, you can figure it out quickly. The plays all look the same after watching for a bit.

How very voyeuristic of you.