• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

If there was a general election tommorrow how would you vote?

Who would you vote for in a general election

  • LAbour party

  • Conservative party

  • Liberal democrats

  • other


Results are only viewable after voting.

beamishboy

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2008
5,475
255
30
✟6,878.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative
My Dad'd 'ave had your dad. (He'd've batter him with a copy of Das Kapital.):p

If I ever voted for the Tories he'd come back and haunt me. Quite right too. I'd haunt myself if I ever voted for the toffee-nosed capitalist bastids.

Still, the Labour party deserves all it gets for abandoning the working class and sending us into an illegal war.


Labour is so fake. They put on a fake working class accent which grates on my nerves. I may still be young but I can't understand the objections. What's wrong with my school? It's got centuries of history behind it and the world's greatest writers and explorers and scientists hail from my school. It really annoys me how Labour chaps always make a big show when their kids are in Comprehensive schools. And what's wrong with hereditary peerage? My dad can give me his watch and his house but not his title?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

beamishboy

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2008
5,475
255
30
✟6,878.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative
The wealth of the rich was stolen from the sweat of the poor. We'd like it back, thanks.

The workers who toil on the land of the landowner do so because of the wages they are paid. They've done their work and they've been duly paid. Where is the theft and what else is there to give that isn't criminal extortion?
 
Upvote 0

~Jo~

Just becareful out there.
Mar 8, 2008
6,274
489
In my room
✟35,664.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
I would vote Green just to get all the other greeding Mps out of office and No 10.Cant stand this idiot we have now he should have gone to election when the other thing left Tony Blaire that is and not just took it for granted we wanted him there.
 
Upvote 0

Gremlins

Regular Member
Feb 2, 2008
1,497
170
✟25,038.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Labour is so fake. They put on a fake working class accent which grates on my nerves. I may still be young but I can't understand the objections you Commies have. What's wrong with my school? It's got centuries of history behind it and the world's greatest writers and explorers and scientists hail from my school. It really annoys me how Labour chaps always make a big show when their kids are in Comprehensive schools. And what's wrong with hereditary peerage? My dad can give me his watch and his house but not his title?

I really don't understand Commies.

Here's a question: Why should you receive all these benefits? What have you actually done to deserve them other than be born? Why should you benefit from a far superior education when there are people who may be inherently smarter than you, but goes to a Comp in Tower Hamlets? Imagine if we could harness fully the talents of every member of our society, not just allow the top few percent to succeed.
 
Upvote 0

Gremlins

Regular Member
Feb 2, 2008
1,497
170
✟25,038.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
The workers who toil on the land of the landowner do so because of the wages they are paid. They've done their work and they've been duly paid. Where is the theft and what else is there to give that isn't criminal extortion?

Why should the landowner own the land at all? Why don't the workers own the means of production themselves? That way, the landowner won't be skimming a profit off the top and everyone else will benefit. People in employment are essentially selling their labour for someone else's profit.

If I still live here in the next General Election, I'll be voting Lib Dem. Otherwise, I'll be voting for whoever is most likely to keep any Conservative out.
 
Upvote 0

beamishboy

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2008
5,475
255
30
✟6,878.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative
Here's a question: Why should you receive all these benefits? What have you actually done to deserve them other than be born? Why should you benefit from a far superior education when there are people who may be inherently smarter than you, but goes to a Comp in Tower Hamlets? Imagine if we could harness fully the talents of every member of our society, not just allow the top few percent to succeed.

This is so hypocritical. It's all right for you to inherit your parents' possessions but not for me. Unless you wish to pretend to us that you'd reject everything. Isn't this the hypocrisy of life? What I stand to inherit is just the right amount. Anything more must have been stolen from the people.
 
Upvote 0

Gremlins

Regular Member
Feb 2, 2008
1,497
170
✟25,038.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
This is so hypocritical. It's all right for you to inherit your parents' possessions but not for me. Unless you wish to pretend to us that you'd reject everything. Isn't this the hypocrisy of life? What I stand to inherit is just the right amount. Anything more must have been stolen from the people.

There is such a thing as the inheritence tax, you know.

But you still haven't answered the question: Why should people born worse off than you have worse life chances than you?
 
Upvote 0

artybloke

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
5,222
456
67
North of England
✟8,017.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Politics
UK-Labour
It's all right for you to inherit your parents' possessions but not for me.

Oh diddums. I do feel sorry for you. My parents owned an end terrace (now sold, because my mother was unable to look after it) and a car. When my mother dies, I'll probably inherit lawyers' bills. I'd gladly give them away to you if you wish.

By the way, I'm not a Commie. Think something begining with "A".
 
Upvote 0

shout2thelord

adopted aussie :)
Oct 11, 2002
1,726
29
42
crewe, england
Visit site
✟2,215.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
To quote Laura Ingraham "redistribution of wealth does not mean redistribution of power"

You should be able to earn more without the government stealing it and then waisting in without any real accountability. One issue i have with the welfare state that labour has created is that it disempowers people. It tells you, you should be dependant on the government. Its easier to go on benefits than get a job at the monment.

I beleive ther goverment should provide oporunities for training and encourage people to get jobs, then they could earn more (preferbly without the government taking more in tax). The current welfare system and government tells you, your poor your a victim, you wont be anything so you may as well rely on the government.

Ultimately the redistribution of wealth ends up giving more power to a big central government and not to the people of the nation.
 
Upvote 0

MarcusHill

Educator and learner
May 1, 2007
976
76
Manchester
✟24,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
To return to the topic, I'd vote Lib Dem - when they eventually come to power (or to hold sway in a hung parliament), I hope they come good on their promises to reform the way voting in this country works, so our votes will actually count and we'll be able to vote on policies rather than "the only party that can realistically beat the current government".

It would be interesting to see if beamishboy gains some sense of reality by the time he's old enough to vote. I used to think along similar lines to him when I was a public schoolboy.

I also used to think it was somhow easier to get by on government handouts than get a job, but then I've never had to get by on benefits. The Daily Mail cartoon of a benefit scrounger is close to nonexistent. There are criminals of all stripes (including benefit fraudsters) who claim benefits, but very few honest people are content to claim rather than find a job.
 
Upvote 0

ScottishJohn

Contributor
Feb 3, 2005
6,404
463
47
Glasgow
✟32,190.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
You should be able to earn more without the government stealing it and then waisting in without any real accountability.

If your government is not held to account then you and your fellow voters are to blame.

shout2thelord said:
One issue i have with the welfare state that labour has created is that it disempowers people. It tells you, you should be dependant on the government. Its easier to go on benefits than get a job at the monment.

I don't think that is true. As Marcus says, those who think living on benefits is easy are generally those who have no idea about what living on benefits is like.

shout2thelord said:
Ultimately the redistribution of wealth ends up giving more power to a big central government and not to the people of the nation.

The power always lies with the people as long as they think, research, vote and lobby. If they delegate all their choices to their MPs, ignore politics between elections and don't bother to find out about those they vote for then they get what they deserve.
 
Upvote 0

Gremlins

Regular Member
Feb 2, 2008
1,497
170
✟25,038.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
You should be able to earn more without the government stealing it and then waisting in without any real accountability. One issue i have with the welfare state that labour has created is that it disempowers people. It tells you, you should be dependant on the government. Its easier to go on benefits than get a job at the monment.

I beleive ther goverment should provide oporunities for training and encourage people to get jobs, then they could earn more (preferbly without the government taking more in tax). The current welfare system and government tells you, your poor your a victim, you wont be anything so you may as well rely on the government.

No offense, but only someone with minimal experience/knowledge of the welfare system would actually think that. Yes, there are some flaws, but you'd rarely be better off on the dole than you would be working.

Ultimately the redistribution of wealth ends up giving more power to a big central government and not to the people of the nation.

Given that the government is just an expression of the will of the people, there shouldn't be any distinction.
 
Upvote 0

ScottishJohn

Contributor
Feb 3, 2005
6,404
463
47
Glasgow
✟32,190.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
I would vote Conservative if there was no Christian Party standing, I couldnt vote Labour or Liberal they are so anti-christian.

Nonsense. There are plenty of hard working Christians in all of the main stream parties.
 
Upvote 0

Gremlins

Regular Member
Feb 2, 2008
1,497
170
✟25,038.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I would vote Conservative if there was no Christian Party standing, I couldnt vote Labour or Liberal they are so anti-christian.

The irony of this is is that Brown (and Blair) are two of the most devoutly religious men in British politics at the moment.
 
Upvote 0