NailsII
Life-long student of biological science
So, the universe stayed the same but all the light changed - you do realise that makes no sense at all, don't you?No, I am not aware that there was any radioactive decay at all. Neither was our light faster. The change was NOT IN our light! Our light is the result of the change in the other state universe. Life processes were very different, yes. As they will be again, in the future.
What split?You will find that there are no star maps beyond the split! No records outside our records, of life on earth, that are reliable. We have the monopoly on the record, and we also have the future state records! Science ought to lick the dust from the soles of our feet, not we from it's.
Go and have a look in a museum sometime - and a proper one.Really, now?? I think you mean SOME creatures were like that, but, as Eden's creatures migrated out from Eden, that is to be expected in some cases.
You will see all these wonderful, strange-looking transitional creatures. Strange how they all line up according to evolutionary theory, and correclate with geological dating techniques and radio-isotope dating.
That's a joke, right?Well, there were a lot of different kinds of apes, so? For all I know, some of them might have resulted from wicked pre flood man. Naturally some similarities would be expected.
So god tinkered with our genes just in case there was an ice-age....Well, if an ice age came, we might need some extra hair. Other changes likely would reflect our changing world and universe state. If we could evolve and adapt real fast, this is par for the course.
Even though biblical time does not allow for an ice-age, and I don't believe one is mentioned in said book.
DNA evidence doesn't work for the future, it only records what was successful in the past.
So we used to be apes and have vestigal fur, our genitals begin development near our hearts (as in fish)and so our connective tubes are all over the pace (similar patterns are seen in nerves by the way, particulalry the cranial/facial nerves.
In short, virtually every feature in humans can be traced back to an earlier ancestor - except our supposed great intelligence; which some of us disregard too easily.
But the sea creatures would have been very limited on land, that is why they evolved further. Watch a mudskipper struggle in a drought and you are looking back around 380 million years to what their ancestors may well have done.No problem. Rapid evolving was needed. It makes perfect sense to have creatures able to move over land and water. In fact, I would almost suspect, that such creatures would be out front in the migration.
nonsense. Viral transmission cannot have been any different, we would be able to detect DNA changes.What you fail to appreciate here is how compounding this evidence is alone, we evolved from an ape-like creature and share a common ancestor (approx. 6 million years ago) with chimps and bonobos.No. You seem to lock into how ERVs are transmitted at the present time. No such limits exist, unless you prove a present state in the past. You can't.
Fact.
I ould love to hear it.Yes there is. It might be a bit long for this thread.
Start a new thread if you'd like.
You really have no idea what you're talking about, have you.That is nothing. I could see chimps being a result of sex with wicked man. Or, perhaps, that the viral ancestors transmitted by sex, and other ways. Possibly even in some less then malevolent way.
But you don't have it, you only have around 6,000 years.Not true. No great time was needed.
The evidence show us that no body to human body took around 600 million years.
When people don't have children until they are 100 (like abraham) then you have a vastly reduced rate of reproduction.Really? How is that? I think someone threw one past you there.
Yeah, cursed for having a laugh at a drunken man.Well, Cainan was cursed for what he did to Noah. Sounds like it had an effect. Cain also had some mark put on him, that is an effect. We don't know what kind. For all I know, maybe God made him real short. Like the hobbit men in Flores? The serpent was changed, and it seems right quick. Eve started to have problems in child birth as a result of sin. One king went down on all fours, and had hairs like eagle feathers, and ate grass of the field for seven years! I can't see how sin would not affect people. Especially in a time when there was a different life process.
And again, provide evidence for a change in life processes. At least show us when life became normal and not inhabited by demons and grass-eating king birds.
i don't even think you can take that literally and believe it, I thought more of you.
Yawn.It all takes a long time in this present state. No reflection on a past state.
Dream on.The implications of the bible are a lot more staggering that that. People will rise up from being dead as a door nail. There will be no more sickness at all. Nor death. We will live forever and ever. There is coming a time when not one dead body will be ever in the earth, or any graveyards at all.
And the timescale, and your idea needs a guiding hand more complex than the univerese itself.It is, every bit as much as yours! The same evolving takes place, the only question is the starting point.
Better than the book of nonsense myth.Not till they filter it through the PO past myth first.
At least it is backed by observation instead of superstition.
Upvote
0