Yeah, I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying it is hard to call it science because it is not possible to conduct an experiment to prove itIt is the only mathematical solution to the singularity problem.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yeah, I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying it is hard to call it science because it is not possible to conduct an experiment to prove itIt is the only mathematical solution to the singularity problem.
Do you need a test when the math works?Yeah, I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying it is hard to call it science because it is not possible to conduct an experiment to prove it
True. Despite many disagreements, science and religion can actually adapt to each other to a certain extent.
Someone reads Anne McCafferey![]()
The Ship Who SangAs in Dragon Riders of Pern? It's been years! But I don't remember what FTL drive is from . . . .
.
No, I learnt about that in Traveller, the rpg.Someone reads Anne McCafferey![]()
According to M-Theory, there are infinite numbers of universes, each with its own physics.
Anything that can happen is happening. How cool is that.
We live in a multiverse!
Yes it is very simple.
The crreator who made the big bamg happen is infinitely the best scientific mind that will ever exist.
So when we think we have created something with science we are foolish.
Science has never created anything. It has only manipulated what was already here.
Our greatest scoentific minds are like Children with Downs syndrome compared th Yahweh.
That is why I vcannot wait til he gives me my new nody and mind so I can actually really grasp eternity.![]()
Yeah, I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying it is hard to call it science because it is not possible to conduct an experiment to prove it
I presume you were planning on commenting on those verses and saying what your point was, because I am a little bad at second-guessing!
At the same time, I find it hard that an infinitely sane God would expect us to ignore the evidence that is front of our eyes.
After all, where does our desire to learn come from in the first place?
But following the literalist interpretation of the Bible instead of the evidence would be denying what is in front of our eyes
And it isn't science to take only the evidence which backs up your viewpoint. Instead, Science works by refining a theory to match in with the evidence.
But as I just said, the very scientific theory you claim to be wrong is the one that allowed you to post your first post about the discovery of the planet anyway.
Therefore, either you have to have it all and accept the discovery of the planet and the supporting evidence, or you need to have neither, and are therefore unable to use any science, like this planet, or anything else, because everything relies on the same methodology.
Failure to do either is simply an logical fallicy