• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Bible: Symbolic or Literal?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Citanul

Well, when exactly do you mean?
May 31, 2006
3,516
2,690
46
Cape Town, South Africa
✟275,962.00
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Robert the Pilegrim

Senior Veteran
Nov 21, 2004
2,151
75
65
✟25,187.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
david_x said:
God has resurected the dead.
And in the rather clear context of understanding the physical world, what exactly is your point?

Do I claim anywhere that we are as great as God?

I do not.

You claimed that science is "shifting sands".

You claimed that it required a great deal of faith to trust science.

I pointed out that for understanding the physical universe science is very useful, that in fact the process of science has demonstrated again and again that it is good at coming to a solid understanding of the physical universe.

I further pointed out that for that purpose it is far more useful, far more accurate, far more reliable than the Bible.

As I stated in my earlier response to Floatingaxe if you wish to believe, based on your faith and your interpretation of the Bible, in a young Earth, I have no quarrel with you.

My quarrel with YECists starts when they claim that the physical evidence agrees with them, when they start bearing false witness against scientists, when they start claiming that anybody who doesn't believe as they do is, at best, a "bad" Christian.
 
Upvote 0

Dannager

Back in Town
May 5, 2005
9,025
476
40
✟11,829.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Democrat
You think that's somthing? That is truly sad. "Oh yeah we made an H-bomb" God has resurected the dead. The most we can do seems to be destruction.
Sure, you can believe that, if you want to ignore the incredible things humanity has done for the better. Modern medical science, for instance, has saved many times more lives than wars have ended.
 
Upvote 0

Robert the Pilegrim

Senior Veteran
Nov 21, 2004
2,151
75
65
✟25,187.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Robert the Pilegrim said:
by having "faith" in those "shifting sands" we've:
split atoms,
released the power of the Sun,
gone to the moon,
correctly predicted how much light is bent by gravity,
wiped out diseases,
identified genes responsible for diseases allowing parents to avoid passing those diseases on...
You think that's somthing? That is truly sad. "Oh yeah we made an H-bomb" God has resurected the dead. The most we can do seems to be destruction.
And how do:
atomic power plants,
sustained fusion,
going to the moon,
saving and improving lives through medicine,
...
qualify as destruction?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Oh, well then I don't see what we have been arguing about. I only take things in contect to the culture they were written in and to.
But that's my point: it doesn't matter. The author's could be spider-monkeys for all the sway it has.
Take it into context if you wish, but that doesn't change the fact that the literalist interpretation of the Bible leads to external contradictions. The one we are discussing is that of a flat Earth.

So what if the author's believed in a flat Earth? It's still wrong.

You mean you don't know? I kinda wanna wallow in this for awhile but that would be wrong I guess. :)

Darwin, on his death bed, denounced everything he thought at the threat of being exercised from the CC. (To a Catholic that means you can not go to heaven)
Urban legend. Next you'll be telling me that evolutionary theory is false because of this alleged conversion.
 
Upvote 0

david_x

I So Hate Consequences!!!!
Dec 24, 2004
4,688
121
36
Indiana
✟28,939.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
No he didn't. In fact, this story is first on the list of AIG's Arguments Creationists should not use.

Urban legend. Next you'll be telling me that evolutionary theory is false because of this alleged conversion.

Disprove evoulution? No that would have nothing to do with why I said that.

Do I claim anywhere that we are as great as God?

Yet you think it actually amounts to something.

My quarrel with YECists starts when they claim that the physical evidence agrees with them, when they start bearing false witness against scientists, when they start claiming that anybody who doesn't believe as they do is, at best, a "bad" Christian.

So certain theories are inheriently unconciderabele? Who is refusing to be wrong then?

atomic power plants,
sustained fusion,
going to the moon,
saving and improving lives through medicine,
...
qualify as destruction?

The atom bomb was not made for energy, originally.

What good has going to the moon done?

(Healing is a gift that God can give, too)
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Disprove evoulution? No that would have nothing to do with why I said that.
Nevertheless, that is what the 'Darwin recanted' argument is used for. I notice that you ignore my and Citanul's comments on the fact that it is an urban legend. Even AiG acknowledge this.

(Healing is a gift that God can give, too)
Perhaps, except he has only given it to middle-class caucasians in countries in the financial North, and who are recieving medical care. The Africa child with a literally flesh-eating parasite recieves no such healing, no matter how hard he and his family plead to the Judaeo-Christian god.
Somehow, this indicates a less-than-divine cause.
 
Upvote 0

MoNiCa4316

Totus Tuus
Jun 28, 2007
18,882
1,654
✟49,687.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Doctors are thousands of times more reliable when it comes to healing.

James 5:14-15: "Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: and the prayer of faith shall save him that is sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, it shall be forgiven him."

Doctors can really help people, but God can heal anyone and even raise the dead! He is so much more reliable..
 
Upvote 0

Dannager

Back in Town
May 5, 2005
9,025
476
40
✟11,829.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Democrat
James 5:14-15: "Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: and the prayer of faith shall save him that is sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, it shall be forgiven him."

Doctors can really help people, but God can heal anyone and even raise the dead! He is so much more reliable..
You really don't know the meaning of the word "reliable", huh?
 
Upvote 0

david_x

I So Hate Consequences!!!!
Dec 24, 2004
4,688
121
36
Indiana
✟28,939.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Nevertheless, that is what the 'Darwin recanted' argument is used for. I notice that you ignore my and Citanul's comments on the fact that it is an urban legend. Even AiG acknowledge this.

And yet i did not use it for that. He was persecuted for his belief non the less.

Perhaps, except he has only given it to middle-class caucasians in countries in the financial North, and who are recieving medical care. The Africa child with a literally flesh-eating parasite recieves no such healing, no matter how hard he and his family plead to the Judaeo-Christian god.
Somehow, this indicates a less-than-divine cause.

Yeah, then how? Unless you are clamming that you are devine, how in the world do you know?

Doctors are thousands of times more reliable when it comes to healing.

I was kinda refering to Doctors.
 
Upvote 0

MoNiCa4316

Totus Tuus
Jun 28, 2007
18,882
1,654
✟49,687.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
You really don't know the meaning of the word "reliable", huh?

'Reliable' is something that we can rely and depend on. Usually, the dictionary says that it's something that is predictable and gives the same results on multiple trials...I guess people need something to be predictable to trust it. God is not predictable, but He is the most 'reliable' thing there is anyway. When we pray, we should be ready to accept His will, whatever it is, but we should also believe that He is forever faithful. If we don't believe that God would be faithful in the future as He has been in the past, we would have less faith, not more. And Jesus said that whatever we ask in faith, we would receive.



God bless


monica
 
  • Like
Reactions: david_x
Upvote 0

Dannager

Back in Town
May 5, 2005
9,025
476
40
✟11,829.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Democrat
'Reliable' is something that we can rely and depend on. Usually, the dictionary says that it's something that is predictable and gives the same results on multiple trials...I guess people need something to be predictable to trust it. God is not predictable, but He is the most 'reliable' thing there is anyway. When we pray, we should be ready to accept His will, whatever it is, but we should also believe that He is forever faithful. If we don't believe that God would be faithful in the future as He has been in the past, we would have less faith, not more. And Jesus said that whatever we ask in faith, we would receive.
Reliability is based on how often you can expect something to work in the way you require of it. A car is reliable if it constantly runs well. A computer is reliable if it doesn't crash. God's healing is not reliable, because only an insanely small fraction of those who pray for healing actually receive it. Most terminally ill patients who pray die of their illness. Most sick people who turn to prayer eventually turn to modern medicine (or die of rampant infection). You really can't get any more unreliable than that.
 
Upvote 0

MoNiCa4316

Totus Tuus
Jun 28, 2007
18,882
1,654
✟49,687.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Reliability is based on how often you can expect something to work in the way you require of it...

I think that reliability is how trustworthy something is, and "how often you can expect something to work in the way you require of it" is a condition we place on trustworthiness. Usually we don't rely on unpredictable things. In the case of God, this 'condition' is unnecessary, because He always does what is best, even if we don't understand it. He's reliable without needing to be predictable, and the only such exception in the world.
Maybe I just have my own definition ;) I see what you're saying though, it's true that not everyone by far gets healed through prayer (although I know people whose family members were healed that way). I think we're just using the words differently, lol. I'm trying to say that even though the healing is unreliable, that doesn't make God unreliable.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
And yet i did not use it for that. He was persecuted for his belief non the less.
He recieved criticism, yes, but he wasn't tortured.

Yeah, then how? Unless you are clamming that you are devine, how in the world do you know?
By observing their actions. So-called 'medical miracles' only seem to occur in the presence of above-average medical care. Indeed, you never hear of amputees being granted new limbs, or starving children being granted food, no matter how hard they pray.

That is, the power to heal â la Christ seems to be restricted to aiding those with middle-class, white Americans with above-average medical care.
This is the observed fact.
How, then, do you reconcile this with youru claim that healing is available to all Christians?
 
Upvote 0

MoNiCa4316

Totus Tuus
Jun 28, 2007
18,882
1,654
✟49,687.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
*jumps into this discussion* :p

By observing their actions. So-called 'medical miracles' only seem to occur in the presence of above-average medical care. Indeed, you never hear of amputees being granted new limbs, or starving children being granted food, no matter how hard they pray.

Sometimes God decides to use people to answer prayers, so if someone goes and gives a starving child some food, their prayer is being answered and God is being glorified. Jesus told us to do this. He gave us the opportunity to serve Him by doing what is in our power to do, and pray for what we can not do.

That is, the power to heal â la Christ seems to be restricted to aiding those with middle-class, white Americans with above-average medical care.
This is the observed fact.
How, then, do you reconcile this with youru claim that healing is available to all Christians?

Actually, I have friends who are not 'middle class white Americans with above-average medical care', and their family members were cured by prayer. There are poor people who were healed as well.
What evidence are you basing this on?
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
*jumps into this discussion* :p



Sometimes God decides to use people to answer prayers, so if someone goes and gives a starving child some food, their prayer is being answered and God is being glorified. Jesus told us to do this. He gave us the opportunity to serve Him by doing what is in our power to do, and pray for what we can not do.



Actually, I have friends who are not 'middle class white Americans with above-average medical care', and their family members were cured by prayer. There are poor people who were healed as well.
What evidence are you basing this on?
Have you got any evidence beyond the anecdotal for the curative power of prayer? (welcome to the discussion)
 
Upvote 0

MoNiCa4316

Totus Tuus
Jun 28, 2007
18,882
1,654
✟49,687.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Have you got any evidence beyond the anecdotal for the curative power of prayer? (welcome to the discussion)

thanks :)

I haven't read scientific studies on prayer, so I don't know what they show....however, I don't think that they can be accurate. Would God answer a prayer which was said just to test Him? I mean, He's not a vending machine, :p and I think He only answers sincere prayers.

God bless!


monica
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
thanks :)

I haven't read scientific studies on prayer, so I don't know what they show....however, I don't think that they can be accurate. Would God answer a prayer which was said just to test Him? I mean, He's not a vending machine, :p and I think He only answers sincere prayers.

God bless!


monica
Sure... but is there any record to suggest that sincere prayers improve medical outcomes?

double blind testing should show this
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.