• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Worst book you ever read?

SH89

Sola scriptura
Aug 7, 2004
8,206
226
36
Los Angeles, California
Visit site
✟32,673.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
the Cacther in the Rye ******shivers******

Holden Caulfield, the main character in the novel, is nothing but a whiney, judgmental person. He judges EVERYTHING;from the way people talk, to the way people breathe. He is also a very hypocritical and unstable person.

Holden would say something like the followng:

"So, I decided that I would go to 36th street. On the my way there, I saw a bunch of phonies wearing coats in the middle of winter. I really hate phonies who wear coats in the middle of the winter. I really do. So I went to the movie, and I took off my coat."
 
Upvote 0

Nienor

why so serious
Jun 7, 2004
12,714
342
37
Seattle
✟37,216.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
the Cacther in the Rye ******shivers******

Holden Caulfield, the main character in the novel, is nothing but a whiney, judgmental person. He judges EVERYTHING;from the way people talk, to the way people breathe. He is also a very hypocritical and unstable person.

Holden would say something like the followng:

"So, I decided that I would go to 36th street. On the my way there, I saw a bunch of phonies wearing coats in the middle of winter. I really hate phonies who wear coats in the middle of the winter. I really do. So I went to the movie, and I took off my coat."
but....I love that book....
 
Upvote 0

Pogue

left CF, please see profile for further details
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2006
11,851
525
37
http://www.thesonscafe.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=15
✟82,340.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
the Cacther in the Rye ******shivers******

Holden Caulfield, the main character in the novel, is nothing but a whiney, judgmental person. He judges EVERYTHING;from the way people talk, to the way people breathe. He is also a very hypocritical and unstable person.

Holden would say something like the followng:

"So, I decided that I would go to 36th street. On the my way there, I saw a bunch of phonies wearing coats in the middle of winter. I really hate phonies who wear coats in the middle of the winter. I really do. So I went to the movie, and I took off my coat."

I didn't like the book much either. I know loads of people really love it but I just found it slightly pretentious. I wouldn't say I hated it but I thought it was overrated.
 
Upvote 0

elf_lady_9

the book loving Elven Calvinist
Mar 13, 2006
889
43
in a house in a city in a state in a country on an
✟23,778.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And two characters named Heathcliff...

actually there's only one character named Heathcliff. but there are two other characters besides Heathcliff whose names begin with H, so it is confusing. Hindley is Catherine's drunken brother and Hareton is his cute son that Heathcliff takes advantage of. ( Hareton is the only character i like in the book, cause he isn't naturally wicked or selfish, and he changes when he's given the chance. his romance with young Cathy is so sweet. :) unfortunately that little story only took up a couple chapters in the otherwise hideous book. :sigh:) the other confusing thing, beside the Catherine vs young Cathy, is the difference between Edgar Linton, Catherine's husband and Linton Heathcliff, Heathcliff and Isabella's Linton's son. so i guess there is more than one Heathcliff, technically, but they don't really call him by his last name, they just call him Master Linton. agghh! it's annoying me just thinking about it! :mad: these people are more interconnected than the main characters of a soap opera, and much more messed up! :doh:
 
Upvote 0

Lessien

It's what I do that defines me
Nov 14, 2004
14,694
233
35
You never know....
✟38,590.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A Tale of Two Cities. I know that lots of people love that book, but I just couldn't get into it. I had to read it over the summer AND write an essay about it, and that was the summer when we didn't have Internet, so I couldn't go online and check out the Clif Notes or anything like that. In the chapter "Monseigneior (sp?) in Town," I couldn't tell it was satire until my teacher mentioned it in school that year. Why? Dickens used too many words! Why couldn't he just say "He killed a peasant and didn't care, so the kid's parent came after him that night and killed him"?

The story was OK. It would've been better if he'd cut out a LOT of parts I and II, because Part III was where all the action was.
 
Upvote 0

Beautiful Fireball

Tomorrow is another day
Apr 30, 2006
10,971
871
✟37,745.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
A Tale of Two Cities. I know that lots of people love that book, but I just couldn't get into it. I had to read it over the summer AND write an essay about it, and that was the summer when we didn't have Internet, so I couldn't go online and check out the Clif Notes or anything like that. In the chapter "Monseigneior (sp?) in Town," I couldn't tell it was satire until my teacher mentioned it in school that year. Why? Dickens used too many words! Why couldn't he just say "He killed a peasant and didn't care, so the kid's parent came after him that night and killed him"?

The story was OK. It would've been better if he'd cut out a LOT of parts I and II, because Part III was where all the action was.
I loved that book, but I do admit that it is hard to get into a first. I also had an awesome teacher who discussed it with us and I think that made the book so much better.
 
Upvote 0

E-beth

Senior Contributor
Feb 6, 2002
7,610
741
Ohio
Visit site
✟35,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
For me it was Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell. My aunt told me it was like the adult Harry Potter, so naturally I had to check it out. The book in hardback weighed a ton, and I just couldn't get hooked in, even after the first few chapters. To me, a book really needs to draw me in quickly or I am not going to be able to finish it. And I didn't.

Maybe one day I will be bored and bedridden and will try it again. But right now it is :sick:.
 
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
the Cacther in the Rye ******shivers******

Holden Caulfield, the main character in the novel, is nothing but a whiney, judgmental person. He judges EVERYTHING;from the way people talk, to the way people breathe. He is also a very hypocritical and unstable person.

Holden would say something like the followng:

"So, I decided that I would go to 36th street. On the my way there, I saw a bunch of phonies wearing coats in the middle of winter. I really hate phonies who wear coats in the middle of the winter. I really do. So I went to the movie, and I took off my coat."

I never really got it either. Someone gave me a copy to read when I was 15, which is supposed to be the age Holden was in the book, and told me that it would change my life. It didn't. :( I just kept thinking, "what's so great about this?" :yawn:

Portnoy's Complaint was another of its ilk. It was supposed to be this groundbreaking book that shakes your soul by exposing your innermost thoughts, but Portnoy's innermost thoughts and my innermost thoughts are so very different, I just found it pornographic and disturbed. :sick:
 
Upvote 0

Periann

Well-Known Member
Nov 21, 2003
2,896
167
TX
✟26,420.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I really liked Catcher in the Rye. After doing a research paper on it, I still reread it.

If a book is really terrible I put it down and there is no going back, so I can't remember the worst book Ive ever actually read! If I think enough on it Im sure I can come up with one though. I disliked All the Pretty Horses but it wasn't the absolute worst book Ive ever read.
 
Upvote 0

Morghaine

Studying
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2006
7,721
228
Ozark MO
✟88,131.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Oh, do I have a stinker to share with you all! :) The book is called The Reckoning by Thomas F. Monteleone - this book is SO horrible. Here's the outline. DNA from the Shroud of Turin, in-vitro-fertilization with a virgin nun and voila, you have a supposed descendant of Jesus - but wait - he turns out to be mostly evil. Can his 'creators' turn him to the good side, or will he go completely evil?? Don't ask me, it was so awful I quit reading about 1/2 way through.

*shivers*
 
Upvote 0

Borealis

Catholic Homeschool Dad
Dec 8, 2003
6,906
621
54
Barrie, Ontario
✟10,009.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Six pages and nobody has named the worst book EVER written?

I'll give you a bottom three list, in descending order.

Number Three: The Still, by David Feintuch. I enjoyed the first two Nicholas Seafort books, but the character was starting to really grate by the fifth book. Then I picked up The Still, and began missing Seafort's insane obsession with 'duty.' The Still is about a 'prince' of some sort who is supposed to inherit some sort of power, BUT he loses the power if he loses his virginity. So he spends the first third of the book whining about pretty much everything. Oh, but he finds sexual release in his best friend's offer to pleasure him by hand. His male best friend, of course. Anyway, I say he whined in the first third of the book, but he probably continued whining all the way to the end; I'll never know, because I took it back to the library and asked for my money back.

Number Two: The 'Song of Fire and Ice' series by George R.R. Martin. I got through two and a half books before I realized that there was little to no plot advancement, lots of people dying, main characters being killed often enough that you don't know who the protagonists are supposed to be, and side plots that have absolutely NOTHING to do with anything else for the first two and a half books. Finally I'd had enough, and paid the library to take them back.

Number One: Who Has Seen the Wind, by W.O. Mitchell. The absolute WORST book EVER written, bar none. 'Song of Fire and Ice' is #2 because this book, while not nearly as long as even a single book of that series, is twice as boring in every possible way. Worse, I was FORCED to read it, because it's required reading in high school in Ontario. Depending on the school district you're in, you'll read it in different grades. I read it in Grade 10. Then, after we moved, I found it was on the reading list for Grade 12. I told the teacher flat out that no force on this earth could make me read that piece of utter waste again. I also said that I could write a better book than that, and she asked me to prove it. So that became my Grade 12 English project; I got my best mark ever in English that year.

But, back to the book. Believe me, my head is pounding just at the thought of how atrocious this experience was. But as a public service I shall sum up the book for you, so you can be excused from reading this 'classic' of Canadian literature.

A young boy who's name thankfully escapes me learns about life through the deaths of various creatures and people that pass through the pointlessness that is the life of a six-year old in Depression-era Winnipeg.

Note that Depression-era Winnipeg is a lot like Depression-era Omaha, without the exciting night life. Homer and Shakespeare could not combine their talents to write an interesting story about Depression-era Winnipeg. Nor would they be foolish enough to do so. Unfortunately for Canadian high school students for the past few decades, Mitchell was foolish enough, and since there is so little Canadian literature worth mentioning, they get stuck reading this. And people wonder why today's kids have so little interest in reading.

You know how sometimes you'll see a review of a movie or book that describes how awful it is, and you want to see for yourself just to see if it's really that bad? Please trust me. Given the choice, claw your own eyes out to spare yourself the sheer emptiness of this 'masterpiece' of Canadian literature. Hold yourself hostage with a shotgun, string yourself up by the neck, whatever it takes, don't let them make you read this.

I'll take fifty Wuthering Heights and a thousand Catchers in the Rye before reading this unfathomably bad book ever again. I'll even write a note for my son when he gets to high school exempting him from reading it. Now that's parental love.
 
Upvote 0

Nienor

why so serious
Jun 7, 2004
12,714
342
37
Seattle
✟37,216.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Number Two: The 'Song of Fire and Ice' series by George R.R. Martin. I got through two and a half books before I realized that there was little to no plot advancement, lots of people dying, main characters being killed often enough that you don't know who the protagonists are supposed to be, and side plots that have absolutely NOTHING to do with anything else for the first two and a half books. Finally I'd had enough, and paid the library to take them back.
I can accept people not liking Catcher in the Rye, but ASoIaF is one of the best fantasy series ever written. There's plenty of plot in the book, and I enjoy having main characters die - it makes the books much more realistic. I hate it when people "die" and don't come back. Sure, the cast is huge and even with so many dying it seems to be growing, but I truly enjoy these books. One of the things I appreciate the most is that it isn't always clear who is good or bad because both sides have done good things. I go from hating to loving characters in single books. An author who can do that is amazing. I think George R.R. Martin's only fault is that he takes too long in getting the next book out.
 
Upvote 0

Morghaine

Studying
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2006
7,721
228
Ozark MO
✟88,131.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
ASoIaF sounds a lot better than the "Wheel of Time" set is shaping up to be. If you can't say what's needed in eleven books, then just shut up. The first six or seven were good, but they got stale when he switched editors.
I hate to sound this way, but I'm afraid the series will never end!! It just keeps going on and on!

Did you read that Robert Jordan is pretty sick? I can't remember what he has, but the normal prognosis isn't good.
 
Upvote 0