Open letter to Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton told Donald Rumsfeld, he was presiding over a failed policy in Iraq"
My questions are: "How can you call it a failed policy when there is not a person that has a better idea of how to deal with Iraq. A cut and run policy is not a better idea. Also hoping someone else (UN) will take the problem off your hands is not a better idea." "How can the best idea available be a failed policy?"
There are several alternatives that need to be evaluated:
1)America take over the oil and only reward the Sunni, Shiites, and Kurds when they behave properly. If they don't behave, they starve.
2) Make it a crime (death penalty) for a cleric to advocate the killing of anyone for any reason and to advocate the overthrow of the elected government. Put microphones and cameras in every mosque and every school, then use the evidence in a trial.
3) Eliminate all guns and knives from Iraq until they began to act like civilized people. Anyone caught with a gun, knife or explosives would be executed after showing reasonable proof.
There is a necessity for America to figure out how to control civil wars where there is significant guerilla warfare. America cannot allow Iraq and the Middle East to become a threat to America ever again. Also, someone better think about how America is going to survive without the oil of the Middle East. What happens in Iraq will determine if America is the world leader or declining influence in the world.
Whatever decision is made, it must receive support from both the democrats and Republicans. Democrats tend to whin, complain, and criticize and never offer any constructive help. The news media is so full of hate of President Bush that it is worthless. The news media had better start rowing they boat, because everyone gets drowned when the boat sinks. The idea of being independent is silly.
America, the world, and the American Jews need to make some tough decisions about the Middle East. The world needs to evaluate if they can resist the flood of Arabs in their countries, and the American Jews need to evaluate if they are going to support Israel.
New York State Jews had better really evaluate what Hillary Clinton represents and vote for what is best for Israel. If Israel is eliminated, no Jew anywhere is safe. Christians and Republicans are the only ones that really support the Jews.
The democrats and the news media are a part of the problem and not a part of the solution. The Middle East is a tough nut to crack, but this just means America needs to use a bigger hammer or if possible a smarter hammer. I can accept a cut and run policy, but only if there is an instantaneous removal of all American forces in Iraq. Then we can hunker down and wait for the worst.
If one desires to really resolve the Middle East problem one should consider WW III.
The concepts being implemented by the Germans and Japanese were considered to be so objectionable that it was necessary to eliminate all those that advocated those concepts. The fact that Iraq cannot form a civilized government, the continuing Terrorists guerrilla attacks around the world, and the stated aim to eliminate Israel and America represents sufficient proof that the Islamic and/or Shiite concepts are so objectionable that it is necessary to eliminate all those that advocate these concepts.
It is obvious that Iran is not going to comply with the UN call to stop the nuclear weapons activities. After a rejection by Iran, America should make a full Declaration of War (including total news medai censorship) against Iran and all those that support or are associated with the Iranian philosophy (Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, El Sadar, etc.). In order to soften up Iran, nuclear weapons should be used to eliminate all military targets, then America should take over all oil production in Iran then implement: 1)American take over of the oil and only reward the Sunni, Shiites, and Kurds when they behave properly. If they don't behave, they starve.
The Islamic Terrorist threat began when Kolmani went back to Iran, and normalcy will not return until the concepts of Kolmani and the Shiites are eliminated from all of the Middle East. There is not a lot of difference between the Shiites and the Nazis because both wanted to take over the world by force.
Hillary Clinton told Donald Rumsfeld, he was presiding over a failed policy in Iraq"
My questions are: "How can you call it a failed policy when there is not a person that has a better idea of how to deal with Iraq. A cut and run policy is not a better idea. Also hoping someone else (UN) will take the problem off your hands is not a better idea." "How can the best idea available be a failed policy?"
There are several alternatives that need to be evaluated:
1)America take over the oil and only reward the Sunni, Shiites, and Kurds when they behave properly. If they don't behave, they starve.
2) Make it a crime (death penalty) for a cleric to advocate the killing of anyone for any reason and to advocate the overthrow of the elected government. Put microphones and cameras in every mosque and every school, then use the evidence in a trial.
3) Eliminate all guns and knives from Iraq until they began to act like civilized people. Anyone caught with a gun, knife or explosives would be executed after showing reasonable proof.
There is a necessity for America to figure out how to control civil wars where there is significant guerilla warfare. America cannot allow Iraq and the Middle East to become a threat to America ever again. Also, someone better think about how America is going to survive without the oil of the Middle East. What happens in Iraq will determine if America is the world leader or declining influence in the world.
Whatever decision is made, it must receive support from both the democrats and Republicans. Democrats tend to whin, complain, and criticize and never offer any constructive help. The news media is so full of hate of President Bush that it is worthless. The news media had better start rowing they boat, because everyone gets drowned when the boat sinks. The idea of being independent is silly.
America, the world, and the American Jews need to make some tough decisions about the Middle East. The world needs to evaluate if they can resist the flood of Arabs in their countries, and the American Jews need to evaluate if they are going to support Israel.
New York State Jews had better really evaluate what Hillary Clinton represents and vote for what is best for Israel. If Israel is eliminated, no Jew anywhere is safe. Christians and Republicans are the only ones that really support the Jews.
The democrats and the news media are a part of the problem and not a part of the solution. The Middle East is a tough nut to crack, but this just means America needs to use a bigger hammer or if possible a smarter hammer. I can accept a cut and run policy, but only if there is an instantaneous removal of all American forces in Iraq. Then we can hunker down and wait for the worst.
If one desires to really resolve the Middle East problem one should consider WW III.
The concepts being implemented by the Germans and Japanese were considered to be so objectionable that it was necessary to eliminate all those that advocated those concepts. The fact that Iraq cannot form a civilized government, the continuing Terrorists guerrilla attacks around the world, and the stated aim to eliminate Israel and America represents sufficient proof that the Islamic and/or Shiite concepts are so objectionable that it is necessary to eliminate all those that advocate these concepts.
It is obvious that Iran is not going to comply with the UN call to stop the nuclear weapons activities. After a rejection by Iran, America should make a full Declaration of War (including total news medai censorship) against Iran and all those that support or are associated with the Iranian philosophy (Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, El Sadar, etc.). In order to soften up Iran, nuclear weapons should be used to eliminate all military targets, then America should take over all oil production in Iran then implement: 1)American take over of the oil and only reward the Sunni, Shiites, and Kurds when they behave properly. If they don't behave, they starve.
The Islamic Terrorist threat began when Kolmani went back to Iran, and normalcy will not return until the concepts of Kolmani and the Shiites are eliminated from all of the Middle East. There is not a lot of difference between the Shiites and the Nazis because both wanted to take over the world by force.
