An "intelligent design" recognized in the universe (sub-atomic unto organic unto a comprehensive awareness thereof) . . . an "intelligent design" which I perceive and propose as cosmological complexification . . .
. . . an intelligent design doesn't have to have an intelligent designer!!! Are we (including such hierarchy-echelon as Dawkins) so hung up on obverse-creationism that we can't allow, at least, AN INHERENT DESIGN in and of existence?? INHERENT!!
An "intelligent design" recognized in the universe (sub-atomic unto organic unto a comprehensive awareness thereof) . . . an "intelligent design" which I perceive and propose as cosmological complexification . . .Inherent systemic.
. . . an intelligent design doesn't have to have an intelligent designer!!! Are we (including such hierarchy-echelon as Dawkins) so hung up on obverse-creationism that we can't allow, at least, (maybe a concept of cosmology eludes comoprehension). . . AN INHERENT DESIGN in and of existence??
My perceptive premise is (and should be obviously) not some "creative-extension" of phenomenon (for, yes, what/who would have created the Creator? etc.) The point is that the "evolutionist" paradigm for the universe is chaos, random/chance factors of variance, thence "selection" based almost solely on survivability post-facto -- determined by and from the milieu beyond.
My point:
Simply, ya don't need a guy in the sky making stuff through "poofogenesis" to have not only stuff, but consolidations and compositions and complexifications of stuff that are inherently, incredibly almost, representative of at least one word of the binary term . . . . DESIGN.
As for the other word? Is not the intelligent design unquestionably so, given that it not only appears as/in our intelligence? Our intelligence (at least potentially-- through inspiration, investigation, study) doesn't just "get it" as philosophy and such. The "it" we get also involves us as catalysts (in the applied sciences, especially genetics?)
Our intelligence is an integral part/system/complex/co-existent phenomenon with that IT of the universe.
. . . an intelligent design doesn't have to have an intelligent designer!!! Are we (including such hierarchy-echelon as Dawkins) so hung up on obverse-creationism that we can't allow, at least, AN INHERENT DESIGN in and of existence?? INHERENT!!
An "intelligent design" recognized in the universe (sub-atomic unto organic unto a comprehensive awareness thereof) . . . an "intelligent design" which I perceive and propose as cosmological complexification . . .Inherent systemic.
. . . an intelligent design doesn't have to have an intelligent designer!!! Are we (including such hierarchy-echelon as Dawkins) so hung up on obverse-creationism that we can't allow, at least, (maybe a concept of cosmology eludes comoprehension). . . AN INHERENT DESIGN in and of existence??
My perceptive premise is (and should be obviously) not some "creative-extension" of phenomenon (for, yes, what/who would have created the Creator? etc.) The point is that the "evolutionist" paradigm for the universe is chaos, random/chance factors of variance, thence "selection" based almost solely on survivability post-facto -- determined by and from the milieu beyond.
My point:
Simply, ya don't need a guy in the sky making stuff through "poofogenesis" to have not only stuff, but consolidations and compositions and complexifications of stuff that are inherently, incredibly almost, representative of at least one word of the binary term . . . . DESIGN.
As for the other word? Is not the intelligent design unquestionably so, given that it not only appears as/in our intelligence? Our intelligence (at least potentially-- through inspiration, investigation, study) doesn't just "get it" as philosophy and such. The "it" we get also involves us as catalysts (in the applied sciences, especially genetics?)
Our intelligence is an integral part/system/complex/co-existent phenomenon with that IT of the universe.
