Disclaimer: All content expressed below are completely expressed from opinion.
Humans have questioned their own existence for centuries. Yet what progress have we made? We have now established many beliefs, religions, theories, and so on. Yet humans either reject or accept these ideas based on only a few factors. Humans are vulnerable to accept a truth only if it appeals to their rationale, yet what many of us do not understand or even come close to question at times are what
is a rationality? The denotation of rationality is, "Containing, pertaining to, or utilizing logic or reason. Yet where does this reason come from? How do we truly know if what we are doing contains reason? Humans have also come to establish morals and values, yet how do we know what is right and wrong? Once a human has come to acknowledge or discover how dubitable the foundation of these ideas are
established upon is when one comes to realize the existence of the human perception. There are many perceptions that are created by human beings that attempt to explain the enigmas of this world and those who are unable to fathom or conceive any form of explanation for such things adopt the explanation of those who have out of ignorance. Those who created stories or myths formed religions or beliefs
with what they believed what was true under their perception of right and wrong, as well as attempting to explain certain worldly mysteries. And there are those who had a more keen perception and formed reason through the laws of our superficial world. Those who seeked to explain the truths of this world through logic and the laws of the world came to form the sciences. The science, through my perception
is merely the attempt to understand, comprehend, or explain the functions and mysteries of this world. Science has a strong cogency that appears to be irrefutable due to the massive logic it portrays in explaining the laws of this world, which founds its reason through evidence. Yet the science humanity has managed to master also has its flaws. Science, though it harnesses a great cogency, can not
explain everything. The reason for this is because the logic and reason that science has managed to find in order to explain truths and laws are all founded on teh perception of this world. Science can not explain what occurs after one's death. The reason for this is because science is only able to explain what occurs here, and even then it can not account for divine interventions. View life as a code system
that contains and enforces certain rules, yet when we witness certain things that scientists find as impossible, that is when we witness the "glitches" within our "matrix". Science at times cannot explain certain anomalies within our world. And in reference to the previous question of "What occurs after death?" Since the sciences tried to contribute to an explanation (teh birth of scientology, which personally
I find believers of this as people who have yet to expand their perceptions, no offense) it was inhibited to explain certain things due to its restricted perception and lack of explanation. This brings me to religion. the reason why religion exists within our lives is to provide an explanation for what science cannot explain. The greatest questions that religion accounts for are "Why are we here?" and "What happens after we die?"
These questions have driven people insane and have also brought emotional and spiritual turmoil to some. Some people are fixated with the matter and cease to live life, others do not mind the mystery because they do not fear death. Some do not fear it because they believe death shall not come to them soon because they are too young, or they simply do not contemplate profound enough to realize that we
have no idea what awaits us on the other side. In order to provide some composure to those who are driven mad by the idea and to bring orser within society, religion was created. The reason for teh existence of many religions is due to teh amount of individuals who were able to ruminate profoundly enough over the matter and suddenly became enlightened after accumulating enough faith within a higher entity.
By believing within a higher power, people were at ease that an entity was in control. Yet because this was created by a human's perception, these religions were massively flawed, having been founded on tenuous foundations and false principles. The only way a human could truly formulate a belief that could possibly come to attain a righteous explanation that may dictate the right and wrongs of mankind,
is if that religion is founded upon fundamentals and principles of celestial power. But how do we know what a celestial power is? Or if it exists? Certain parts of this world still remain a mystery to science. Certain parts of our world are still not explained. Our world is vast beyond our perception, and the trace amounts that have not been touched or explained by science, are because they are not of our world.
Science has managed to explain the superficial mechanics of this world, but not the mechanics that are beyond our realm. Questions that may stump many scientists are, "Why are we here?", What happens when we die?", "What is love?","And how do you know what you know is true?"...but the greatest question of all time is, "What is faith?" Faith is an astonshing power that is able to answer all of our worldly questions.
Yet despite all of this, science still attempts to try and satisfy the human's curiousity using the knowledge attained of this world. Science may begin to explain love, faith, and the other questions and provide so called "evidence" to account for its reputation of cogency. Yet what it fails to answer these anomalies because it only defines how we are able to attain it. Does science believe in the human soul?
Science only is able to comprehend the nature of the human body and mind. It only understands how us humans are able to move and understand through the faculties provided by our brains. Yet think of ourselves this way, are our human bodies just vessels that house our souls, or better yet our essence? Yes, we may acquire genetic traits and we may have certain personalities or characteristics. but ask yourself this,
are we able to inherit minds? Does our mother or father have the same mind as us? Do we believe exactly in all of one's entire mind? No. We have our own mind. Now understand this, what if our brain is merely the medium of what our mind is? In other words, what if our entire body is merely the physical worldly form of what we truly are as a soul or spirit? The only way we may communicate and interact between other spirits
is through the bodies we were provided with within this world. Whatever our mind thinks is processed within our brains and eventually generated as an act. Yet that soul we have pertains to the other realm we do not know of, unless we have religion. And now do you see why science cannot explain the human soul? Science, once again, was formulated by the human perception in order to explain the mechanics of
this world, yet religion was created to explain the unknown realm of the afterlife. Our bodies are just containers, ships, or vessels that house our essences. One must come to acknowledge this mysterious component of the body because once our body is extinguished, where does that component go? It is abstract, it cannot degenerate and it is not of this world. It is like love. Love can only cease to exist for a certain moment, yet it perpetuates
through time. If one love ends another is surely to eventually develop because love is a faculty of the human spirit, it is a power that the soul wields and that is why it cannot cease to exist. And since the soul is not of this world, love is neither because it is power that is not of this realm. Other abstract powers are also part of the soul, such as hate. Such malicious abstract functions are also developed
from the human soul, yet they are manifested only through worldly influences. When the soul is first born, it is pure. It only naturally seeks love. It innately asks for the love of its mother and father, yet once left unattended in this world, her= or she is susceptable to inherit or acquire other faculties of the human soul. Yet how do we know that love is good? How come hate is considered bad? Well the
only way to explain this is by analyzing the effects of love and how it affects others. Love in essence is actually much to complex for words and is ineffable with my perception, words cannot truly express the essence of what love is. But what we all know is that we as human beings are in constant search for it and we all need it in order to be happy. Love expressed throughour worldly language and wordly
perception is synonymous to consideration. Consideration is a component of love and composes a major part of love. Pure love can be achieved just by having omnipotent consideration in all aspects of the human being and teh social environment, as well as the earth. Yet this level of love is unattainable because we as human beings are not perfect. Why is this? Well, what if we were? What if this world was created
as a utopia and as the perfect society. The question obvious here would be, why are we here then? All life would be operating at its optimal potential and no growth would be possibly attainable and nothing would be unknown to us. We would all be God if we were to all be perfect within a perfect world. Yet why are we not perfect? Well so that we may overcome our imperfection and strive to try and become perfect <to be cont'd>
Humans have questioned their own existence for centuries. Yet what progress have we made? We have now established many beliefs, religions, theories, and so on. Yet humans either reject or accept these ideas based on only a few factors. Humans are vulnerable to accept a truth only if it appeals to their rationale, yet what many of us do not understand or even come close to question at times are what
is a rationality? The denotation of rationality is, "Containing, pertaining to, or utilizing logic or reason. Yet where does this reason come from? How do we truly know if what we are doing contains reason? Humans have also come to establish morals and values, yet how do we know what is right and wrong? Once a human has come to acknowledge or discover how dubitable the foundation of these ideas are
established upon is when one comes to realize the existence of the human perception. There are many perceptions that are created by human beings that attempt to explain the enigmas of this world and those who are unable to fathom or conceive any form of explanation for such things adopt the explanation of those who have out of ignorance. Those who created stories or myths formed religions or beliefs
with what they believed what was true under their perception of right and wrong, as well as attempting to explain certain worldly mysteries. And there are those who had a more keen perception and formed reason through the laws of our superficial world. Those who seeked to explain the truths of this world through logic and the laws of the world came to form the sciences. The science, through my perception
is merely the attempt to understand, comprehend, or explain the functions and mysteries of this world. Science has a strong cogency that appears to be irrefutable due to the massive logic it portrays in explaining the laws of this world, which founds its reason through evidence. Yet the science humanity has managed to master also has its flaws. Science, though it harnesses a great cogency, can not
explain everything. The reason for this is because the logic and reason that science has managed to find in order to explain truths and laws are all founded on teh perception of this world. Science can not explain what occurs after one's death. The reason for this is because science is only able to explain what occurs here, and even then it can not account for divine interventions. View life as a code system
that contains and enforces certain rules, yet when we witness certain things that scientists find as impossible, that is when we witness the "glitches" within our "matrix". Science at times cannot explain certain anomalies within our world. And in reference to the previous question of "What occurs after death?" Since the sciences tried to contribute to an explanation (teh birth of scientology, which personally
I find believers of this as people who have yet to expand their perceptions, no offense) it was inhibited to explain certain things due to its restricted perception and lack of explanation. This brings me to religion. the reason why religion exists within our lives is to provide an explanation for what science cannot explain. The greatest questions that religion accounts for are "Why are we here?" and "What happens after we die?"
These questions have driven people insane and have also brought emotional and spiritual turmoil to some. Some people are fixated with the matter and cease to live life, others do not mind the mystery because they do not fear death. Some do not fear it because they believe death shall not come to them soon because they are too young, or they simply do not contemplate profound enough to realize that we
have no idea what awaits us on the other side. In order to provide some composure to those who are driven mad by the idea and to bring orser within society, religion was created. The reason for teh existence of many religions is due to teh amount of individuals who were able to ruminate profoundly enough over the matter and suddenly became enlightened after accumulating enough faith within a higher entity.
By believing within a higher power, people were at ease that an entity was in control. Yet because this was created by a human's perception, these religions were massively flawed, having been founded on tenuous foundations and false principles. The only way a human could truly formulate a belief that could possibly come to attain a righteous explanation that may dictate the right and wrongs of mankind,
is if that religion is founded upon fundamentals and principles of celestial power. But how do we know what a celestial power is? Or if it exists? Certain parts of this world still remain a mystery to science. Certain parts of our world are still not explained. Our world is vast beyond our perception, and the trace amounts that have not been touched or explained by science, are because they are not of our world.
Science has managed to explain the superficial mechanics of this world, but not the mechanics that are beyond our realm. Questions that may stump many scientists are, "Why are we here?", What happens when we die?", "What is love?","And how do you know what you know is true?"...but the greatest question of all time is, "What is faith?" Faith is an astonshing power that is able to answer all of our worldly questions.
Yet despite all of this, science still attempts to try and satisfy the human's curiousity using the knowledge attained of this world. Science may begin to explain love, faith, and the other questions and provide so called "evidence" to account for its reputation of cogency. Yet what it fails to answer these anomalies because it only defines how we are able to attain it. Does science believe in the human soul?
Science only is able to comprehend the nature of the human body and mind. It only understands how us humans are able to move and understand through the faculties provided by our brains. Yet think of ourselves this way, are our human bodies just vessels that house our souls, or better yet our essence? Yes, we may acquire genetic traits and we may have certain personalities or characteristics. but ask yourself this,
are we able to inherit minds? Does our mother or father have the same mind as us? Do we believe exactly in all of one's entire mind? No. We have our own mind. Now understand this, what if our brain is merely the medium of what our mind is? In other words, what if our entire body is merely the physical worldly form of what we truly are as a soul or spirit? The only way we may communicate and interact between other spirits
is through the bodies we were provided with within this world. Whatever our mind thinks is processed within our brains and eventually generated as an act. Yet that soul we have pertains to the other realm we do not know of, unless we have religion. And now do you see why science cannot explain the human soul? Science, once again, was formulated by the human perception in order to explain the mechanics of
this world, yet religion was created to explain the unknown realm of the afterlife. Our bodies are just containers, ships, or vessels that house our essences. One must come to acknowledge this mysterious component of the body because once our body is extinguished, where does that component go? It is abstract, it cannot degenerate and it is not of this world. It is like love. Love can only cease to exist for a certain moment, yet it perpetuates
through time. If one love ends another is surely to eventually develop because love is a faculty of the human spirit, it is a power that the soul wields and that is why it cannot cease to exist. And since the soul is not of this world, love is neither because it is power that is not of this realm. Other abstract powers are also part of the soul, such as hate. Such malicious abstract functions are also developed
from the human soul, yet they are manifested only through worldly influences. When the soul is first born, it is pure. It only naturally seeks love. It innately asks for the love of its mother and father, yet once left unattended in this world, her= or she is susceptable to inherit or acquire other faculties of the human soul. Yet how do we know that love is good? How come hate is considered bad? Well the
only way to explain this is by analyzing the effects of love and how it affects others. Love in essence is actually much to complex for words and is ineffable with my perception, words cannot truly express the essence of what love is. But what we all know is that we as human beings are in constant search for it and we all need it in order to be happy. Love expressed throughour worldly language and wordly
perception is synonymous to consideration. Consideration is a component of love and composes a major part of love. Pure love can be achieved just by having omnipotent consideration in all aspects of the human being and teh social environment, as well as the earth. Yet this level of love is unattainable because we as human beings are not perfect. Why is this? Well, what if we were? What if this world was created
as a utopia and as the perfect society. The question obvious here would be, why are we here then? All life would be operating at its optimal potential and no growth would be possibly attainable and nothing would be unknown to us. We would all be God if we were to all be perfect within a perfect world. Yet why are we not perfect? Well so that we may overcome our imperfection and strive to try and become perfect <to be cont'd>