Not really, if the Bible is the word of God then I'd expect it to be quite easy to interpret, it's written in black and white but seems to be interpreted in different ways by many people even today.
I understand why you might think that. But look at what the Bible is.
The Old Testament has rules in it, but mostly it's a history of the relationship between God and his people, and that relationship is pretty complex. It's also got random poetry, satire, and various kinds of advice. Even the rules aren't directly applicable, both because our situation is very different from 3000 years ago and because the rules were part of a covenant with the Jews which doesn't apply directly to most of us.
The New Testament is the story of Jesus, and how his earliest followers understood him. You'll see that different followers understood him differently. And Jesus himself tended to teach in stories rather than clear rules.
This is not the work of a God who just wants us to follow the rules. Indeed Jesus' death isn't the work of such a God either. If people sinned, you'd expect God to use thunderbolts to get their attention, rather than join them and let them do their worst to him.
It looks like God's goal is to help people develop into responsible people with their own ideas. And he's chosen to do that by giving us some insight into himself but letting us react to it in different ways. I often get the impression while reading Jesus interact with people that he's trying to provoke a certain development in them, rather than just give them an answer. If things like this aren't what is going on, God has been surprisingly incompetent.
This observation is not limited to Christians:
"The Tao which can be expressed is not the unchanging Tao; the name which can be named is not the unchanging name.
"The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth; the mother of all things is the nameable.
--- Tao Te Ching
Of course many Christians don't agree with me on this. They think that God's goal was to teach us their specific interpretation.
