The "doing good" is the same as obeying the Gospel. When some Jews came to Christ and asked Him what works God requires (John 6:28,29), Jesus said that believing was the *work* that was required in order to be saved.
Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
I'm wondering how all this is accomplished if man does nothing.
How does man lay hold on eternal life if he doesn't fight the good fight of faith?
How does man strive against sin if he does nothing?
Does he hide his talent in the ground and do nothing?
If all sin includes future sins, why did Jesus tell the churches in Revelation to repent?
................A behavioral standard like the Law can never be the basis for our standing before God (justification), because all it can do is accuse us of being imperfect.
Because they were not representing His church.
Amen to that brother.
That's the problem with gospel number 2 and those which say things along the lines I expressed in explaining it.
We see the same mistake being made here again on this thread just as elsewhere.
There are variances in particulars just as I said that there were in both number 1 and number 2. But the basic difference between the two ways to salvation remains the same.
Any behavioral standard can never be the basis for our standing before God (justification). Only the work of Christ on our behalf can be that basis.
"He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." 2 Corinthians 5:21
So, all your sins are forgiven if you represent the church, and they aren't forgiven if you aren't representing the church.
So forgiveness is given if you represent the church? Do you have scripture which says God will forgive us if we represent the church? What exactly is representing the church?
Where did I say you must represent the church to get saved? You seemed to have said it for me.It came from your lips.
Since you put it into the form of a question - the answer is yes.You don't know much about justification (righteousness) in the Old Testament, do you? Pe
Since you put it into the form of a question - the answer is yes.
But I'm sure that others would like to be enlightened by you if you will favor us.
Scripture says that SANCTIFICATION is a lifelong process, but that too has three tenses.
1. We are already sanctified through the indwelling Holy Spirit
2. We are being sanctified by the power of the Spirit into the likeness of Christ
3. We shall be perfected when we see Christ at the Rapture.
As to justification, we don't have to go back to the 16th century. Just read and study the epistle to the Romans, which is the Word of God. Take Rom 5:1 as an example:
Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
The "doing good" is the same as obeying the Gospel.
When some Jews came to Christ and asked Him what works God requires (John 6:28,29), Jesus said that believing was the *work* that was required in order to be saved.
Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
Any behavioral standard can never be the basis for our standing before God (justification).
Only the work of Christ on our behalf can be that basis.
This is a bizarre reading of the grammar of English, not to mention Greek. "Justified" here is aorist, and certainly does mean in the past. Hence NRSV translates "Therefore, since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through whom we have obtained access to this grace in which we stand; and wec boast in our hope of sharing the glory of God."Interesting that you quote Rom 5:1 that says "being justified" meaning they are presently continuing the process of justification and not "have been justified" which would have indicated an event in the past. Rom 5:1 confirms that justification is a lifelong process.
The OP has been revised to indicate which gospel I prefer - even though anyone should be able to comment on their own views without referring to mine.
You seem to have misunderstood the basics on justification as the N.T. fleshes it out for us.Man was justified, thus righteous, by the life he lived, not just his belief. In other words, by his behavior and obedience.
Number one has always seemed to me to be pretty good news even though it seems to be foolishness to some.Gospel means "good news" and neither position represents "good news". You should be using "theology" not "gospel".