KerrMetric said:
So you think Texas and New Mexico are deposited top soil? Were you being serious? I hope not.
Consider this, from a geology survey of Ontario:
"The
Borderlands represent sequences of
Phanerozoic-aged(i.e. less than 600 million year old) sedimentary rocks deposited in basins during
the periodic inundation of the early North American continent by inland seas. This deposition occurred in 4 major basins--the Appalachian, Michigan, Moose River and Hudson Bay basins--bordering the Canadian Shield on its northern, eastern and southern sides (the flat-lying sedimentary rocks beneath the Canadian Prairies represent another such basin on the western side of the Shield, outside of Ontario). These rocks contain deposits of a wide range of industrial minerals, salt, oil and gas."
This supports my position that many global sized floods have occurred in the past. This implies both inwash, inundation, and outwash on varying scales depending on topography and other factors. Sediments give a clue as to water depth and duration of flooding. Sedimentation and erosion on a large scale are clearly part of massive inundation. Features of GC size are no problem, although like the example in Pennsylvania, they may look quite different from the GC.
The rainbow covenant was not just a result of a single flood. God had allowed flooding, in accordance with physical laws, for millions of years. He brought those floods to an end by stabilizing the earth, so that he could continue his purpose for man without another large destructive event.
He temporarily suspended the laws of physics, that he created along with the stuff it acts upon, just as he did the laws of biology when he raised Jesus from the dead. The resurrection was the most 'outrageous' miracle that he performed, yet it is believed without question by all christians.
Why is the flood, and other miracles, so hard to accept, especially when there is ample geological evidence to support it?