justlookinla
Regular Member
You are wrong. The claim is always that there is only evidence of natural processes. No one is saying that supernatural processes cannot have occurred, they only point out the fact that there is no evidence of anything supernatural and that evolution can be explained without referring to magic.
No, I'm not wrong. There's two very different views of the involvement of God in evolution. Two very different worldviews. Simply saying 'biologists support evolution' is being less than forthright concerning those very divergent views.
You only have a strawman version of evolution and a claim that there are those with foolish unsupported beliefs ( and that would be the ones that demand that a god must be involved). If you could show evidence for a god scientists would accept it.
No one has shown evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity. But that's ok, isn't it?
Again this is not true and is also a personal attack. Personal attacks are against the rule here.
Pointing out that you offer nothing but empty boasts and invisible evidence isn't a personal attack. Now, repeatedly calling someone a coward is a personal attack. Sound familiar?
Upvote
0