Teenage pregnancies almost halved thanks to sex ed

Uncle Siggy

Promulgator of Annoying Tidbits of Information
Dec 4, 2015
3,652
2,737
Ohio
✟61,528.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
UK tops league of teenage pregnancy
by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail

Britain still has the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Western Europe despite being one of the world's biggest users of contraceptives.


The figures, which emerged yesterday in a large- scale international study, appeared to explode claims by the sex education lobby that the UK's sky-high teenage birth rate is down to ignorance.

It showed that four out of five females between the ages of 15 and 44 in Britain - 80 per cent -use some form of contraception.

This compares to 76 per cent in the U.S., 75 per cent in France and 59 per cent in Japan.

Britain, nevertheless, has a sky-high level of teenage pregnancies, with 2.9 out of every 100 girls aged between 15 and 19 giving birth every year.

In France, where there is less contraceptive use, only 0.9 of every 100 girls aged 15 to 19 have babies, according to the survey.

The level in Germany is 1.1 per hundred girls while in Japan it is only 0.4 per hundred.

The findings suggest the huge growth in single parenthood in the UK in recent years - much of it a result of teenage pregnancy - has little to do with a lack of knowledge of sex and contraception among young people.

Recent research projects have contradicted the long-standing claim of the sex education lobby that more information and better distribution of contraceptives is needed, pointing away from ignorance as the cause of pregnancy among young girls.

Yesterday's report from the U.S. pressure group Population Action International surveyed health and reproduction statistics in developed countries and those in the Third World.

Alongside Britain the countries with the highest rate of contraceptive use are China, and, surprisingly for two Catholic nations, Spain and Italy.

The findings bear out research last year at Southampton University which found that teenage girls in Britain have a sophisticated knowledge of contraception.

For example, seven out of ten knew the morning-after pill was effective after more than 24 hours.

A report last month from Prince Charles's charity the Prince's Trust said teenage single girls on sink estates admire their peers who have given birth and often seek to copy their status and acquire the free flat they think having a baby usually brings.

The Family Planning Association insisted yesterday, however: 'Contraceptive use and teenage pregnancy are really two different issues and it doesn't help to lump them together.'

British rates of teenage pregnancy remain well behind those of the U.S. One in 20 girls there has babies each year compared to one in 34 in this country.

Last year more than 48,000 babies were born to teenage mothers in Britain.

They cost the taxpayer an estimated £125million in income support alone every year, apart from other costs such as assistance with rent and council tax.

The easy availability of contraception led to steep falls in the teenage birth rate across Europe in the early Seventies.

But while other countries continued to achieve dramatic falls Britain's has not changed since

According to a 1999 report by the Social Exclusion Unit the lack of education in sex and relationships was considered the main cause.

But the survey suggests the Prince's Trust may have been more accurate in its assumption that the attraction of financial benefits may be more to blame.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-28860/UK-tops-league-teenage-pregnancy.html#ixzz49tRmrqtv
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there isn't a thing in that report which even claims that there is some cause and effect between the number of pregnancies and the sex education. The headline trumpets the notion, but nothing in the article even makes the claim.
How well has abstinence worked?
 
Upvote 0

AGTG

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2014
794
309
✟6,038.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It has nothing to do with education and everything to do with contraception. Some states in the United States will allow schools to give a 13 year old girl the pill without the parent's knowledge, but won't allow them to give them a tylenol for a headache.

The truth is, handing out condoms and talking about sex openly with teenagers will only actively endorse sexual activity among teenagers.

Strangely, sex education rarely addresses complete abstinence which is the absolutely most effective means to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy.

And if you say, "Oh, they're going to do it anyway," you only prove you have a low standard for humanity regarding self-control, standards of morality, and personal accountability and your ideas should be quickly discarded as extreme and illogical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skb420
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Find a study and post it, should be interesting...
First thing I found:

Federal Evaluation Finds Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs Ineffective
In April 2007, a federally funded evaluation of Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage programs was released. The study, conducted by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. on behalf of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, found that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs are ineffective. Of the more than 700 federally funded abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, the evaluation looked at only four programs. These programs were handpicked to show positive results and they still failed.[1]

  • Mathematica’s evaluation found no evidence that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs increased rates of sexual abstinence—the entire supposed purpose of the programs.
  • Students in the abstinence-only-until-marriage programs had a similar age of first sex and similar numbers of sexual partners as their peers who were not in the programs.
  • The average age of sexual debut was the same for the abstinence-only-until-marriage participants and control groups (14 years, 9 months).

Abstinence-Only Programs Do Not Impact Teen Sexual Behavior
In early November 2007, the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy released Emerging Answers 2007, a report authored by Dr. Douglas Kirby, a leading sexual health researcher, discussing what programs work in preventing teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. The report found strong evidence that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs do not have any impact on teen sexual behavior.[2]

  • The study found that no evidence to support the continued investment of public funds.
“In sum, studies of abstinence programs have not produced sufficient evidence to justify their widespread dissemination…Only when strong evidence demonstrates that particular programs are effective should they be disseminated more widely.”

  • The study also found that, to date, no abstinence-only-until-marriage program that is of the type to be eligible for funding by the federal government has been found in methodologically rigorous study to positively impact teen sexual behavior.
“At present, there does not exist any strong evidence that any abstinence program delays the initiation of sex, hastens the return to abstinence, or reduces the number of sexual partners. In addition, there is strong evidence from multiple randomized trials demonstrating that some abstinence programs chosen for evaluation because they were believed to be promising actually had no impact on teen sexual behavior.”
http://www.siecus.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&PageID=1195

So now we have a study that suggests sex-ed does work to reduce teen pregnancy and we have evidence that suggests abstinence does not work like people like to imagine it does.

What conclusion is one to draw from these studies?
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The truth is, handing out condoms and talking about sex openly with teenagers will only actively endorse sexual activity among teenagers.
Is keeping them in the dark about reality and not giving them a means of protection supposed to help in any way?

Strangely, sex education rarely addresses complete abstinence which is the absolutely most effective means to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy.
Not true. I remember covering abstinence in my high school sex-ed class. I have no problem with that being covered. The problem comes in when parents don't want their kids learning anything about sex and so they opt for a abstinence only program which have been shown to be ineffective.

And if you say, "Oh, they're going to do it anyway," you only prove you have a low standard for humanity regarding self-control, standards of morality, and personal accountability and your ideas should be quickly discarded as extreme and illogical.
Your "ignore it until it goes away" approach is what is extreme and illogical here.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,590
4,179
50
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟84,030.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Christianity says otherwise. One time is more than zero.

Really, you're gonna go with a story you don't even believe to try to make your point? The whole rest of the world is NOT virgin Mary.

Take a group of teenagers. Make them all horny as all get out. If they don't have sex at all (abstinence) do you think they're going to get pregnant? I'll tell you the answer. NO. They are not going to get pregnant if they are practicing abstinence.

Abstinence is 100% effective. The issue comes where we get lazy and say "but, they're gonna do it anyway, so, let's give them the means." And then we tailor classes to tell these kids it's perfectly normal for them to be having sex at this age. We make them into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Abstinence practiced faithfully and correctly will yield exactly ZERO pregnancies.
Of course. I don't doubt it happens either. Sometimes not by choice.

But really, how many of us practice anything 'faithfully and correctly'? Isn't that sorta the whole problem with humanity?

With a subject like this.. one slip up in your faith could be pretty costly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paulos23
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Abstinence is 100% effective. The issue comes where we get lazy and say "but, they're gonna do it anyway, so, let's give them the means." And then we tailor classes to tell these kids it's perfectly normal for them to be having sex at this age. We make them into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
It's isn't?
 
Upvote 0

Uncle Siggy

Promulgator of Annoying Tidbits of Information
Dec 4, 2015
3,652
2,737
Ohio
✟61,528.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
What conclusion is one to draw from these studies?

Considering both of them are guesses not a whole lot...

About the only thing it does show is that no matter what your opinion is of "something" you can usually find a study/survey that backs your point of view even if it's totally wrong...
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
22,890
6,562
71
✟321,556.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Really, you're gonna go with a story you don't even believe to try to make your point? The whole rest of the world is NOT virgin Mary.

Take a group of teenagers. Make them all horny as all get out. If they don't have sex at all (abstinence) do you think they're going to get pregnant? I'll tell you the answer. NO. They are not going to get pregnant if they are practicing abstinence.

Abstinence is 100% effective. The issue comes where we get lazy and say "but, they're gonna do it anyway, so, let's give them the means." And then we tailor classes to tell these kids it's perfectly normal for them to be having sex at this age. We make them into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Others have already cited teh studies showing that is not true, but don't let teh facts get in your way.

And as to the Christian I simply pointed out that either it is false or uuo made a false statement. You can't have things both ways.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Considering both of them are guesses not a whole lot...

About the only thing it does show is that no matter what your opinion is of "something" you can usually find a study/survey that backs your point of view even if it's totally wrong...
You are welcome to continue ignoring reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hetta
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

zephyrWiccan

Active Member
Jun 11, 2015
267
250
32
✟16,809.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Abstinence practiced faithfully and correctly will yield exactly ZERO pregnancies.
Not true, as women who are "faithful and correct" in their practice of abstinence can be raped and that can certainly yield a pregnancy, especially if they don't have access (or haven't been taught factually about such thing as is often the case in abstinence only programs) to birth control methods after said rape.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
So what you're saying is if you agree with the article/survey/study then it's reality, and if you don't it's not???
I'm saying you're more than welcome to disagree with the findings of the study I found. I'm open to evidence suggesting otherwise.

I just don't believe abstinence is at all a realistic expectation. You'd have to first show that people are at all reliably faithful to their commitments to establish a basis for pro-abstinence education.

Until then, comprehensive sex-ed seems to be the way to go to reduce teen pregnancies and std rates.
 
Upvote 0

MissRowy

Ms Snarky
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2012
14,382
2,579
43
Western Sydney
✟250,212.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
AU-Labor
The finding you found is good. But you cannot base it on one study. Are there other studies that show that sex education has reduced the number of teenage pregnancies?? I am doing a research subject this year and I have learnt that you cannot base evidence on just one finding. I encourage you to research this further if you can.
Also find studies about abstinence because im sure that there is a lot of stuff out there by reputable sources that shows that abstinence can also be successful.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,457
267
✟28,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It has nothing to do with education and everything to do with contraception. Some states in the United States will allow schools to give a 13 year old girl the pill without the parent's knowledge, but won't allow them to give them a tylenol for a headache.

The truth is, handing out condoms and talking about sex openly with teenagers will only actively endorse sexual activity among teenagers.

Strangely, sex education rarely addresses complete abstinence which is the absolutely most effective means to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy.

And if you say, "Oh, they're going to do it anyway," you only prove you have a low standard for humanity regarding self-control, standards of morality, and personal accountability and your ideas should be quickly discarded as extreme and illogical.
Yet your comments should be dismissed just as fast because guess what some will do it anyway. So to not talk about an option because it makes you uncomfortable is just as foolhardy as not mentioning an option. Some will abstain and some won't. Just accept it.
 
Upvote 0