I don't know if it violates their rights (I'm inclined to think it does), but one thing I can tell is that that governor is anti-Christian.
Commanding or even asking that people disobey God is about as anti-Christian as you can be.
Willtor answered exactly what I was going to say. To take it a little further - I'm not saying the governor doesn't have the right to be anti-Christian. He does. I'm just pointing out that he is being anti-Christian by commanding people to disobey the True God.
Has it become a state responsibility to process immigrant for security reasons? Up here it would be a Federal responsibility.
However, the Christians then follow those rules or else lose their rights.
We ought to obey God rather than men, even if it means being persecuted by an anti-Christian like that governor.
It is the feds, but most states have said that in this case the federal government has failed is failing to do so they are doing.
How do you justify not showing charity to those especially in need of it, especially if the charitable groups themselves do this as their activity?
The problem is that the states can't make that decision. They are breaking the law.
Look, it is REAL simple we do not want refugees and the point is if they know they will not get help why would they WANT to live inside the state borders?
Read what I said above about not wanting them and human nature.
