... As the current president isn't going to congress for any of this foreign policy actions, not even so much as using the authorization of force fig leaf when he bombed Syria, what does it matter who controls the chamber?
--------------------------------
On the Contrary, we explained in extenso (See above) that the Solution to the Korean Nuclear Arms Problem needs, inter alia, also a Treaty of Security Guarantees for PyongYang, and, therefore, these Mid-Term Elections to US Congress and Senate are of Crucial Importance for Peace nowadays.
-----------------------
Desk trauma said:
Yeah, no. The president is not to be given credit for being in office while trends that started years ago continue....
------------------------------
Obama had about 10 Years' Time, and did Not manage to Reach not even the First Economic Results that Trump has got in Less than 2 Years !
-------------------------------
Desk trauma said:
Which actions specifically are you talking about? Same sex marriage is still present in all 50 states and gay adoptions continue.
------------------------------------
What you said was Imposed by a controversial Ruling of the Supreme Court on 2015, with Only 1 Vote of difference, after years of Obama's pressure.
Trump has just Changed the Majority of Judges inside the SC, and anything may happen, from now on.
(Meanwhile, various Measures for respect of People's Beliefs have evolved, f.ex. on Refusals by Craftsmen to do anything that Homosexual Couples demand, and/or by Childrens' Placement Organisations to give a child to Homosexuals, etc).
It's obvious that there is not yet sufficient Change on BioEthics, but this will be a Crucial Test for the Popularity of Trump in the foreseable Future, and for his Electoral Success or Failure : Either he will use that Big Potential of People's Votes, and he shall Win, (as GWBush did on 2005 and Trump himself on 2016), or not.
----------------------
Desk trauma said:
...I very much doubt that the court will reverse the ruling.
---------------------------------
We shall see... It can be that, and/or a Constitutional Amendment, voted by Congress/Senate (and/or a Referendum).
---------------------------------------------
Desk trauma said:
Eight months afterwards and there is very little suspicious about the death of a 79 year old man with a history of heart problems. Also what good would it do to kill him after the ruling is over with?
----------------------------
Judge Scalia notoriously was a very Active Dissident, Fighting against that Controversial SC Ruling of 2015, (with Only 1 Vote more) that he had Denounced as a "Putsch" !
As for Many People's Doubts about his sudden Death, and their Calls for a Full, Transparent, and Efficient Investigation, you can ask them...
--------------------------------
Desk trauma said:
What do you think the court has to do with this technology?.
---------------------------------
It obviously opened a large area for possible applications on thousands of eventual demands by Homosexual Couples, (incited to use Artificial Methods of Technologically obtained Births, because of their Infertility).
Moreover, the Timing of that controversial Ruling, almost Coincided with the emergence of that Technology : 2015 - 2016.
---------------------------------
Desk trauma said:
I know, it's so much better now that we have places like Tanzania hunting down suspected homosexuals...
------------------------
The Freedom of Homosexual Individuals to do what they like in their Private Lives, has Nothing to do with what we are Focusing on here. On the Contrary, Homosexuals could even be the First Victims of eventual Abuses by the above-mentioned Risk for a selfish Lobby of Technocrats to seize Power over Artificial Reproductions of Human Beings (Comp. above).
---------------------------------------
I can't really parse that mound of word salad. What are you trying to say?
-------------------------------
That Many People are ready to Vote for Policies able to Protect Humanity from obvious Risks of possible Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos Artificially produced through such Controversial Technologies (Gene Editing, etc), if they are Multiplied in order to "supply" with Children more and more Homosexuals via Same Sex Marriages, (Comp. Supra).
It's very probable, that Trump's final Win, will be obtained, or not, according to whether he will really use that Popular Potential, (as GWBush did on 2005), or not.
=> This is a Big Issue.