Isn't using something like a person being raped the most disgusting and inconsiderate way to try to prove that morality can be objective?
Isn't it complete ignorance of why almost no one likes being raped? Sense it's completely obvious why most humans don't want someone to beat them up and force them to have sex with them why would this imply that there is a law above our emotions?
Why would they think most people not wanting to be raped proved the existence of a law higher than our emotions?
I wonder if men would try to argue this before women, since women actually fear rape a lot more than men do since men commonly do the raping.
Isn't it complete ignorance of why almost no one likes being raped? Sense it's completely obvious why most humans don't want someone to beat them up and force them to have sex with them why would this imply that there is a law above our emotions?
Why would they think most people not wanting to be raped proved the existence of a law higher than our emotions?
I wonder if men would try to argue this before women, since women actually fear rape a lot more than men do since men commonly do the raping.
Last edited: