<"Hath God said?"
I'm sorry if I offend you by bringing up the analogy. I don't imply that you're the devil! Unless someone is promoting misleading doctrine, is it not pointless to question whether or not God is speaking to another? Beyond harmful fruits, is it helpful to minister in the realm of doubt and questioning? No one can prove it to another.
There's no harm in wanting to search why they believe the Lord is ministering to them a certain way. The Kingdom of God does not admit of observation. How you do go about proving to another that you heard from God. All we have to go by are the fruits, of which only she would know, apart from you witnessing that it was the truth (or not). Look rather at what is said.
<Okay. Why are you so certain it was God speaking to you and not your own mind?
<What in that exchange gives you such adamant certainty about with whom you were speaking?
<You see, people often respond to these questions by saying, "I just know." But this answer places the whole thing on an utterly subjective level.
You do just know. The voice of a stranger they will not follow. When you're the Lord's sheep, you know His voice. Now other spirits do speak, and we're to try the spirit by testing the fruit and the truth against the Word. Since we receive revelation from God a variety of ways, we test everything.
<...As I said to stormdancer, not being able to define clearly and objectively whether or not one is hearing from God leaves the whole area wide open for anyone - Muslims Hindus, Mormons, cult leaders, etc. - to make the claim that they are hearing from God.
It's true that anyone can make that claim. You'll never know either. We can judge what is said and the fruits that it ministers. You cannot clearly define for someone else how God speaks. You can only go by their claims. If the Holy Spirit gives you a big check (disturbance), and you don't witness to it. At that point you might encourage them to examine the fruit. You can point out if it contradicts scripture.
<And how does one teach a new follower of Christ how to hear God when the whole matter for so many Christians is so profoundly subjective?
You know by the fruits. God ministers righteousness, peace, and joy. The enemy does not! He ministers confusion and condemnation. Not to mention wrong doctrine. We judge everything by the fruits. Try acting on what is said. If the Holy Spirit on the inside gives us warning, they'll be a distrubance in your spirit that is uncomfortable. That is not of God. If you're praying for discernment and then act, you'll get a fruit. That fruit will demonstrate whether or not it is of God. If you have God's peace, you're OK. Some things God says for us to do have a timing involved. You'll get a sense of that too if you get ahead of God.
<"I just know God spoke to me," or "You'll just know when He does," is completely contrary to the explicit and clear way God has communicated to us in His Word.
It's additional to reading the Word. He said that His sheep know His voice. You just know. God's Spirit upon your spirit is unmistakeable. If you're not renewed with the leaven of the kingdom, you get a mixture which produces confusion and duality. You always want to work in the leaven of the Kingdom.
<These vague phrases give no plain, concrete way by which a new Christian can learn to "hear God's voice" and discern whether or not God has truly spoken to them. Such vagueness primes the pump for spiritual confusion or worse, IMO.
God primarily gives impressions in your heart, not your mind. Sometimes your mind does receive these things, but it comes into your spirit first. They are moved on in faith.
"The spirit of man is the candle of the Lord, searching all the inward parts of the belly."
Prov 20:27
<<Sometimes we find God speaking to us in many forms, from circumstances around us, to one-liners from even worldly radio or TV, something called to mind from the past, to strong impressions, to reoccurring thoughts, trains of thought you cannot seem to get past.
<Is there anything in Scripture that supports what you've just written above? There is a difference between being reminded of God and His truth by the world around us and actually having a conversation with Him. You don't seem to be making this important distinction...
We know from scripture that we know His voice. I know from experience that His voice may come on top of potentially anything. You might be reading a paragraph out of a novel. When you read the sentence that is from the Lord, I get a sense in my spirit, that the Word is from the Lord. It's like it's on top of what is heard, seen, or read. You don't hear anything with your ears.
You can ask for confirmations. Ultimately, we are accountable for what He says (not just in the Word). I might be reading in the Bible and something is quickened. I recently read one sentence where fasting was mentioned. That one sentence was all that was quickened and that let me know that I needed to fast. The voice of the Good Shepherd. It's the only scripture you need. Only the Lord can train us to "hear" it. If you're waiting for a "voice" that your ears hear, you'll think that the Good Shepherd has abandoned you, or that you're not really a Christian, because those circumstances are extremely rare. You can get clear sentences in your spirit, not heard by your ears. That too is rarer.
<<After hearing the voice of my beloved, I tend to look into all things for the evidence of His nearness, His "fragrance" against His creation is quite compelling.
<Obtaining a sense of God's nearness is not the same as having a direct discussion with Him. I'm not challenging whether or not one can be reminded of God but how one can be sure they have heard from Him directly.
He speaks to us every day, to our spirits and the fruit is faith (which comes by hearing). It ministers righteous or conviction. The reminders you might get, are all part of something you're receiving. God speaks all of the time and when you get "wind" of Him, you look for Him more intently.
<<At some level, it's less likely that He is not speaking in some form. Whether or not Words come forth. An understanding is birthed, leaving a entire garden of mysteries to discover. It's real enough for Him to confirm with 2 or 3 witnesses.
<Well, this all sounds very nice - and rather meaningless. "An understanding is birthed"? "Garden of mysteries"? What are you talking about?
Your spirit has eyes and ears. Your mind is often left out of the picture. You "know" in your "know'er" (in your spirit) because this is where He lives. He typically teaches precept upon precept. We know from scripture that understanding can be like "until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:" 2 Peter 1:19
So we know in part, and sometimes the sum of the parts make for understanding. This understanding sometimes comes like the sun rising. You might have "twilight" moments, then the light burns brighter. The Lord gives understanding, but the manner you get it isn't limited to just one way.
I've read sentences of text and as I read the text, the Holy Spirit quickened it (What if someone asks what that means? What can you say?). It's not tangible for someone else to observe and judge. Sometimes the precepts you've been receiving all fall into place and you find yourself walking into a garden of revelation. It starts coming together, and it's right there before you. I relate to that as a garden. It's part of the excitement of walking in the Spirit. It's definitely not meaningless. Sometimes you getting a fuller understanding comes with the right timing.
<Clearly defined pieces of a larger puzzles don't always present themselves.
<Then the puzzle won't be assembled into a cohesive, sensible whole, will it?
Not at first, all at once. Line upon line. The Lord won't let us "figure Him out". We walk by faith and not by sight. We get a little here and there. Often these pieces of the puzzle fit together into an overall understanding.
If you pray in the Spirit, you pray "mysteries". Since God understands the mysteries and answers prayer, and your spirit man receives the answer (not necessarily your mind). You have to pray for understanding, so obviously you don't just understand it all.
<I'm sorry, but this makes no sense. If a "piece of the puzzle" hasn't "presented itself," then it is necessarily imperceptible and is, for all practical purposes, not real.
Not at all. It's part of walking by faith and not by sight.
<What does "connect the dots by faith" even mean? In fact, what does the entire above quotation mean? The more I consider it, the less sense it makes.
You understand some things as you walk. Since you don't understand it all, and get pieces along the way, you're connecting the dots (as you go) is your faith walk. You're going from faith to faith. It makes perfect sense.
<Where is the discouragement in that?
<I don't recall talking about discouragement
You really can't ask someone to quantify whether or not God is speaking to them, because you cannot prove it. What we do is examine what is said, and look at the fruits. If God usually speaks to our spirits and not our minds, often what we receive, we move on by faith. As you walk out your direction, you get more light, from faith to faith. Is it not discouraging for someone to require proof that God has spoken to them.
That is what human understanding does. It requires proof, when faith has the evidence which is not seen on the inside. It comes by hearing. How do you prove that? You can't.
Mormons, JWs, cults, etc. claim to have heard from God. It's pointless to question how they heard, but rather what they heard.
<I don't mean to be antagonistic, but this matter of being spoken to by the Holy Spirit has been used by the Christians around me to promote all sorts of nonsense. At times it has been very destructive.
Whether or not people are deceived or not has nothing to do with a Christian walking in the light. Those in darkness are the ones who are deceived.
<I just get kinda' fed up with how subjective and loosely defined this area is and how, as a result, it is easily corrupted and made to serve selfish, carnal ends.
Just keep your eyes on the throne.