ebia said:Sorry, but they do - see the authors I cited.
brightmorningstar said:ebia,
The scripture speaks for itself. Can you please show me some BCP or liturgy that indicates all might end up saved. Otherwise no, its not as you claim even though some may have said the same.
Yes please.SOME?
Let me stop you there. What you have responded with is not BCP or liturgy. Please read the question and don’t assume either that what some people claim overrules what scriptures says.Canonized saints of the past,
it's not an offer. I wrote SOME to make a point. You suggested I had cited some people as though the people I cited were run of the mill people, when they are actually key authority figures in their respective churches.brightmorningstar said:ebia,
Yes please.
I'm not offering to give you liturgy.Let me stop you there. What you have responded with is not BCP or liturgy.
they are people who are authorized to speak on what their church teaches and what is permissible opinion. If you can't accept that as a permissible opinion then you have a problem with the those churches (and others no doubt).Please read the question and don't assume either that what some people claim overrules what scriptures says.
I've given you a quote from Cardinal Murphy O Connor. You'll find Timothy Ware's in "The Orthodox Church" and elsewhere. Balthasar in Dare We Hope That All Men Be Saved. The others you can find for yourself if you're so inclined.NB even if you are going to cite people. please quote what they have said.
Then I don’t believe what you are claiming.I'm not offering to give you liturgy.
Lets face Matthew 25 and Revelation 22, and the rest. I would disagree with the Cardinal on this, are we bound to believe a Cardinal or what the NT says?Cormac Cardinal Murphy O'Connor:
"We're not bound to believe that anybody's there (in hell), let's face it...
So has he loved all the people on this earth, everyone of them? Are the Saints not the believers?I cannot think of heaven without thinking of being in communion with all the saints and with all the people I've loved on this earth."
ah ha. Bell has missed the gospel 100%. And indeed what on earth does this sentence actually mean? Is it a strw man?yet God loves us enough to allow us to continue to live in the hell of our own choosing''.
The truth is hell/eternal death is real because Jesus warns of it.'' Hell is real, but it is a place WE CREATE for ourselves as we reject the gift of life God offers to us here on earth''.
brightmorningstar said:ebia,
Then I don't believe what you are claiming.
You're not bound to agree with the Cardinal is right about hell.Lets face Matthew 25 and Revelation 22, and the rest. I would disagree with the Cardinal on this, are we bound to believe a Cardinal or what the NT says?
brightmorningstar said:Good posts from Woodpecker.
Here are the problems..
''Suffering exists and God cares about those in pain,
Yes, true, God warned His people who he gave free choice about life and death throughout His Biblical Testimony. Jesus also said do not be surprised about suffering, He had to suffer as well.
ah ha. Bell has missed the gospel 100%. And indeed what on earth does this sentence actually mean? Is it a strw man?
God does indeed not allow us to live in hell because He has sent His Son so that all who believe will not perish but have eternal life.
The truth is hell/eternal death is real because Jesus warns of it.
As to Rob Bells statement I dont create any hell for myself, dont do it for me.
Yes it looks like Rob Bell has succumbed to a great deception.
I am not disputing that, I am disputing whether they say what you claim. And if you want to debate try quoting to me what they say on the matter with a link to that.JPII, Murphy O Connor, Balthasar all speak with authority on the scope of opinions Catholics may hold
Kalistos Ware speaks with authority on the scope of what Orthodox may believe
Rowan Williams speaks with authority on what Anglicans may believe
All say that it is legitimate to hope that God will save everybody.
Well you follow your Cardinal and I will follow Jesus NT teaching in Matthew 25 and Revelation 22.You're not bound to agree with the Cardinal is right about hell.
You would be foolish to not believe that he is right about the Catholic Church and the scope of opinion it allows.
So are you telling me the quotes were incorrect or that he corrects them?Read the book first, remember.
go look in the books cited. Balthasars is a whole book on the topic. And you have the Cardinal's quote - that's sufficient for the RCC. If you claim to know anything about E Orthodoxy but aren't Orthodox you ought already to have read Timothy Ware's. When you've confined Balthazar then it's sufficient to know that he was JPII's favorite theologian - and one of Benedict XVI's for that matter.brightmorningstar said:Ebia,
I am not disputing that, I am disputing whether they say what you claim. And if you want to debate try quoting to me what they say on the matter with a link to that.
I'm saying judge the whole of what Rob Bell says in the full context - which is largely about challenging people to think about their assumptions - rather than judging a book on somebody else's quotemining. Thats what you agreed before - that one needs to read the boom to judge it.brightmorningstar said:So are you telling me the quotes were incorrect or that he corrects them?
No, you demonstrate. I do not accept the Cardinals quote,go look in the books cited. Balthasars is a whole book on the topic. And you have the Cardinal's quote - that's sufficient for the RCC. If you claim to know anything about E Orthodoxy but aren't Orthodox you ought already to have read Timothy Ware's. When you've confined Balthazar then it's sufficient to know that he was JPII's favorite theologian - and one of Benedict XVI's for that matter.
And I have asked you a question about the quotes. You have read the book, are they accurate or does he detract them?I'm saying judge the whole of what Rob Bell says in the full context –
I have. Reference to published works is a proper citation.brightmorningstar said:Ebia,
No, you demonstrate.
he was the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster. He said what he said. It's not up for you to accept or not. He speaks as an official teacher of the RCC at the highest level. If he says it without getting his knuckles rapped by the Pope then it is okay for a Catholic to hold that view.I do not accept the Cardinals quote,
Anyone who wants to give informed comment on a book needs to read it. You know that.And I have asked you a question about the quotes. You have read the book, are they accurate or does he detract them?
brightmorningstar said:Ebia,
No, you demonstrate. I do not accept the Cardinals quote,
http://www.romancatholicism.org/fathers-will.htm
is in line with the Bible.
And I have asked you a question about the quotes. You have read the book, are they accurate or does he detract them?
So has Woodpecker, with quotes from the book in question.I have. Reference to published works is a proper citation.
Ebia,
No thats a contradiction, we know some will not be saved as the scripture says so.
A and C are both false.
brightmorningstar said: