Ohio Catholic priest convicted abusing churchgoing minors into adulthood, grooming them for commercial sex trafficking
- Thread starter essentialsaltes
- Start date
- Oct 17, 2011
- 33,295
- 36,611
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Over 80 full-color photographs-from the surreal to the grotesque-populate Scary Clowns, bringing readers face to face with their worst nightmares. A pop-up clown in the middle of the book forces the reader to confront his darkest fear in 3-D.
Upvote
0
Hans Blaster
Rocket surgeon
- Mar 11, 2017
- 15,002
- 11,998
- 54
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Wow, that's a lot of makeup, clowns usually wear full face paint. (I think you overstate the level of make up used by DQs. Is it really that much more than highly madeup women wear?
As for the message, a man in a dress is unsual, just like a man in a squirrel suit. It is amusing to children. It makes them giggle.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
What the left doesn't want to discuss really is the entire message. They merely want to focus on the dress. "Ah, the dress is harmless." Well I suppose the dress in and of itself is harmless under certain circumstances. Like Milton Berle or other comedy routines that are actually made to poke fun or be funny. No message, just comedy for a movie or television show. Mrs. Doubtfire, Charlies Aunt etc. No biggie, no message is being sent.
Drag however is something entirely different. It's actually BEING queer. Not just dressing up for a movie or a play. It's allo about queerness and sending a queer LGBTQ message. It's about trying to queer the kids and sexualize them.
Mrs. Doubtfire wasn't sexualizing kids. Neither was Tootsie. But drag queens are. That's why they would dance sexually and provocativly in front of kids, show kids their butts so they can get pictures, simulate sex acts and masturbation at their family friendly shows. That's why the encourage kids to practice being queer and read them LGBTQ propaganda books.
It's not remotely innocent as merely wearing a dress. That's like saying saying a dude dressed in camo shooting at kids is only dressing in camo. Why are we so worried about someone dressing in camo. How ridiculous is that. It's just an outfit for crying out loud. Nothing to see here. Just move along and pay no attention to the man in camo. Camo is just a bit of fun. Meanwhile totally ignoring what the man is doing.
Upvote
0
Hans Blaster
Rocket surgeon
- Mar 11, 2017
- 15,002
- 11,998
- 54
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Have no idea. Don't know that I've ever seen this. Is he a drag queen? Is teaching kids how to dance sexually and practice their queerness? Is he reading sexually queer books to kids and telling them to experiment sexually and find their queer selves?
Upvote
0
Yeah a whole bunch of times. My whole family has. Including my mother and father. We all thought it was great.
I see you totally ignored the rest of my post though. Typical, because Mrs. Doubtfire did none of those things I mentioned that drag queens do. The message of the movie was nothing about what queens message is.
By the way, my son won best actor for playing the part of Charlie's Aunt in the theater production. He one state wide best actor for the same. It's was hilarious. And you know what, not one time did he ever try and queer a child.
Good grief you'd think you'd realize that what happens in a movie doesn't mean the actor is really that way. Dustin Hoffman sure wasn't a drag queen and Christian Bale isn't really Batman.
It's the message Sherlock. Not sure how many times we have to say it. I don't think Mrs. Doubtfire was showing her bare butt to children so they could get photos of it. I also do t recall her telling kids that they should go experiment sexually and practice being queer. Maybe I'm wrong it was a long time ago. But I'm sure my mom and dad would have said something if she had.
Upvote
0
- Oct 17, 2011
- 33,295
- 36,611
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Why should we take you up on it when we've already discussed this in other threads? It's obvious you don't see any problem with any of this, so it seems kind of redundant to discuss what already been discussed and You've already dismissed it. It's call an exercise in futility.
Look we understand. You are all for sexualizing kids. You have no problems with queering children and using grag queens to do it. When someone is that lost, there's really no chance of a recovery.
Upvote
0
Acknowledging the point would eliminate this supposedly being a minority civil rights issue. That's why it keeps erroneously being brought back to that.
Upvote
0
If Eric Idle had decided to start interacting with groups of children in that getup and characterization, that would have been dodgy as well.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
- Oct 17, 2011
- 33,295
- 36,611
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
I do not recall any such thing. Can you please point to one of these other threads with an objectionable book being read at DQSH?
I really am not. I am in favor of family-friendly events at libraries, including DQSH.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
