I think the issue is not wealth but greed.
There are more greedy, money-loving poor people than there are rich of the same lust. Which is a shame since they have nothing with which to fulfil their lust. Just because you have money does not mean you are greedy. And just because you have no money does not mean you are not greedy. I would rather be weathy and not greedy than poor and greedy.
Just saying...
On the contrary. When Christ said, "Where your treasure is, there your heart is", he was precisely making the point that, as a rule, people don't come by a lot of money by accident; they come by it because they lust after it with all their heart. You either worship God or you despise Him and worship money. The person who started this thread stated that the Bible endorsed abundance, accumulation of worldly possessions. Then why pray, did he call the farmer who built another barn to accommodate the surplus of his bumper harvest, a fool, and require his life of him that night. Our thread-starter would perhaps be better advised to dwell more on the Last Things, rather than lust after consumer goods, and ever greater wealth. Perhaps God might consider it's time for him to meet his Maker.
Are we to believe that, when Christ instructed his apostles that they were not to take any money with them, no sandals, not even a change of clothes, he was deliberately misleading them on the subject of opulence? Indeed, would those very basic possessions normally qualify as perquisites of opulence? We may not all be called to that kind of austerity, but it would surely be viewed as a virtue. I believe that most of the poverty-stricken homeless are precisely that because their hearts are too spiritually-oriented, albeit on the subliminal level of our deepest motivations, for survival, or at least longevity, in our depraved Western societies.
While it is true that there are a some references to riches as a reward for virtue in the Old Testament, it is very much a minority testimony and so clearly figurative. Roger Bacon once remarked that prosperity was the blessing of the Old Testament; Adversity, the blessing of the New Testament.
Nevertheless, that too was, I have just indicated, a mistaken view. In fact, it is clear from a reading of the Old Testament that the rich are identified by God with wickedness, used as symbols, personifications of wickedness; the poor man, with the true Israel, the virtuous man. It is a recurrent theme, mostly notably, perhaps in the Prophets, whom, as Christ so bitterly remarked they murdered, since they didn't like their message.
It is amusing to see the contortions the rich go through in order to explain away the words, "They made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man at his death, although he had done no violence and had not spoken deceitfully."
As regards the rich man's violence, we, in the West are all implicated in it with varying degrees of guilt - the poor, least of all - as we cause the deaths of thousands of people of all ages in the Third World every day. But even in Europe and particularly in the US where Mammon is dressed up as the Christian God, often referred to as The American Dream, the millions of homeless people are so, as a result fo the blind, insensate greed of the American Dreamers. So, there's the violence of the rich.
Well, what about the rich "speaking deceitfully, then?" Socialism is supposed to be a terrible vice, while in the New Testament, Ambition, itself, is identified as a particularly pernicious evil. So the putative Christian right has allowed the biggest bunch of villains and half-wits, the actual, political Socialists to posture as the purveyors of de facto Christian observance, using the Second Commandment as their political "front". Just as the right wing used to use the First Commandment as their "political front". Nevertheless, better that vice should pay tribute to virtue, but now, alas, perhaps less so in the US, but certainly in the UK, you couldn't put a cigarette paper between them for ungodliness. And the rich with their their lethally ANTI-social behaviour have finally overreached with their enormous, world-wide, brazen credit fraud, bringing us, as they have, to the precipice of an economic disaster on a historically unparalleled scale. As someone pointed out on a blog, economic disasters are always associated with the prior moral collapse of a society. It is certainly a recurrent theme in the Old Testament.
Milton Freedman, the modern-day guru of the neoliberals, who have imposed this culture of infinite, godless greed on our societies, made no bones at all about his contempt for morality in business, when he stated that the only duty a CEO has, is to maximize the profits of his stockholders. And he meant in the short-term!
It is surely an indication of the wilful blindness of the rich, that in the UK, they have chosen as their putative guru the eighteenth-century, moral philosopher, Adam Smith. Here is what Smith had to say about businessmen - and that was really before capitalism had taken off:
Who Owns Adam Smith? | Common Dreams
Smith was clearly a Socialist of the first water, going so far as to say that people should be taxed according to their means! Why the dirty low-down Commie sob! I don't think even after WWII, when our half-decent Labour party built up our welfare state, the rich paid in proportion to their earnings, even though their upper tax-band levy was equivalent to 95p in the pound.
Furthermore, you are libelling, grossly defaming the poor, whom James described in his Epistle as having been chosen by God to be rich in faith. "Blessed are the poor," as Christ himself stated. The great virtue of poverty of spirit, moreover, as St Leo the Great pointed out in one of his sermons, is more commonly to be found among those who are poor in material possessions than in the rich, self-satisfaction and pride, in the rich, rather than the poor.
It does happen, notaby in the case of family businesses, that the owners are indeed, in part, motivated by a spirit of sacrifice and concern for their workers. While not the fundamental motivation for their work, such a spirit of sacrifice impelling them to put in long hours, from early morning to relatively late, can be striking, if, like me, you are very much more aware of the general depravity of the business ethos, generally.