I was just about to write a lengthy post with arguments and links to various papers and references, but then I thought - what's the point?
You're right, there would be no point in offering several haystacks with an alleged needle in them. The typical scenerio is to offer haystacks, claim there's a needle and say, 'go find it'.
Why not instead simply post the pertinent content showing evidence, based on the scientific method, for the HOW, the process which produced both pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form (Darwinist evolution) and reference the source of those claims? We both know you, nor anyone else, will do that.
Let's be honest - you're never ever going to accept any evidence for evolution
If you have evidence, based on the scientific method, for the HOW, the process, of Darwinist evolution, post it.
because of your religious beliefs.
As contrasted to the faith-based belief that only random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless and goallesss mechanisms (Darwinist evolution) produced all of life we observe today from an alleged single life form of long ago?
If you don't want to accept evolution
I don't accept faith-based Darwinist evolution. If you have the faith in the alleged process, the HOW, of Darwinism, that's your choice.
purely because of your religion I don't have a problem with that - it's a free country. I do have a problem with handwaving away anything posted and never reading anything offered to you
No evidence, based on the scientific method, has been offered to me.
and never doing any of your own research.
I've done plenty of research over quite a few years. All I've found for the HOW, the process, within Darwinism are guess, suppositions, could be's, might be's and best guesses. Evidence for the HOW, the process is completely missing.
If you genuinely want to learn about science - great. AVET can sometime be obtuse, but sometimes asks genuine questions which I'm happy to answer.
Are you suggesting my question, which I've asked probably more than a hundred times and for weeks and months now, isn't a genuine question? Simply because, you, nor anyone else, can offer the evidence asked for doesn't make it a frivolous question.
If you want to ask sensible questions and have a civil discussion - fantastic. Otherwise, forget it. I've posted papers and links for you before which you haven't read, why should I do it any more?
Links and book titles aren't evidence based on the scientific method. Tell you what, post just one of the links, specifically referencing the content in the link which offers the evidence, based on the scientific method, for the HOW, the process which produced pine trees and humans from an alleged single life form of long ago. Not a 'here's the haystack, there's a needle in it for you to find'...when in fact there's likely not a needle, but actual references in actual content.
You're not going to do this. You'll make some sort of excuse, and once again avoid presenting the evidence asked for.
Let me know when you're willing to learn rather than argue and we'll start from there.
Let me know when you have content, actual evidence, to present.