EastCoastRemnant: I hear what you're saying, and it's a valuable perpspective. My perspective is a bit different I guess. I don't see The 1 Project as being ecumenical. I see it as a forum to express honest frustrations with certain aspects of what we currently understand as "traditional" Adventism (although I'm not entirely comfortable with that label, but it will have to function for now), a forum to challenge preconceptions and really learn together and hear various perspectives from within the SDA Church, a forum for refocus on Jesus Christ - who is most important to all SDA Theology. I don't see it as trying to change biblical truth to fit our culture. I see it as understanding what our culture is, both in our areas of the world and within our SDA Church subculture, and discussing how we might better preach and teach the Gospel. Maybe that's just a difference in perspective. I don't know. But that's what I see.
As to this comment: "The new 'metamodern' message from the church seems to be that preaching Jesus is sufficient for these times we live in... that is not the message for the hour! Satan will do whatever necessary to kill the 3 angels message. Identifying, exposing and calling a people out of Babylon is our calling and we cannot let modern philosophy distract us from it." We'll have to agree to disagree.
I think that without Jesus there is no 3 Angels Message and too often in my experience and the testimonies I've heard from others the prophecies from Revelation have been taught in a way that doesn't show Jesus. But without Jesus there is no message in Revelation, or in any other Adventist doctrine. The Great Controversy, the 3 Angels Messages, and all our eschatology means absolutely nothing without Jesus. That's not to say that those doctrines are at all lessened by focusing on Jesus, but just that to not focus on Jesus and understand how Jesus informs these doctrines does a disservice to those doctrines.
But I am happy to agree to disagree, if you wish. And it is a valid and good thing to critique the author of the message. I wouldn't have thought of the points you bring up. So thank you for doing so.
Ubuntu: Thank you for sharing your perspective as well. You bring up some very good points. I agree that there are more than one reason why secular people aren't seen in churches, even if they are interested in truth claims. I don't know where you're located, but as was pointed out in the article, things can be different in different parts of the world - and even possibly different regions of the same country. I don't know necessarily how things are in any particular area, but I find it interesting to hear the similarities and the differences. So thank you.