Major Victory: Sergeant Who Defended Afghan Child from Sexual Abuse Exonerated, Remains in Military

Four Angels Standing

2Peter 1:21 Cry Out For Wisdom Grace Heals
Apr 18, 2016
840
483
Dallas
✟11,005.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Major Victory: Sergeant Who Defended Afghan Child from Sexual Abuse is Exonerated, Will Remain in Military
Jay Sekulow : Apr 29, 2016 : ACLJ.org


The decision by the Army to retain this hero is long overdue and represents a significant victory for SFC Martland. Justice has been served. The U.S. military has a moral obligation to stop child sexual abuse and exonerate SFC Martland for defending a child from rape.



green-beret-martland.jpg
[ACLJ.org] It’s a massive victory more than six months in the making. Sergeant First Class Charles Martland—a decorated war hero who faced expulsion from the Army for defending a child—has been exonerated and will be allowed to remain in the U.S. military. (Image: via YouTube/CNS News)

We have been aggressively advocating for SFC Martland for more than six months, and now we’ve helped achieve a significant victory for this Green Beret war hero.

SFC Martland faced expulsion from the Army for defending a child from sexual abuse and confronting an admitted sexual predator in Afghanistan. The ACLJ argued that his actions—stopping the perpetrator who was violating Afghan law and forcibly removing him from a U.S. military base—were heroic. FULL ARTICLE



The ACLJ had a petition drive to assist in this very thing. Praise God for this victory!:clap: Losing your military career because in the code of protect and defend, children being assaulted by sexual predators don't count when a guest in a foreign nation.Not today! Not today! Thank GOD!
 

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,697
6,127
64
✟339,100.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Major Victory: Sergeant Who Defended Afghan Child from Sexual Abuse is Exonerated, Will Remain in Military
Jay Sekulow : Apr 29, 2016 : ACLJ.org


The decision by the Army to retain this hero is long overdue and represents a significant victory for SFC Martland. Justice has been served. The U.S. military has a moral obligation to stop child sexual abuse and exonerate SFC Martland for defending a child from rape.



green-beret-martland.jpg
[ACLJ.org] It’s a massive victory more than six months in the making. Sergeant First Class Charles Martland—a decorated war hero who faced expulsion from the Army for defending a child—has been exonerated and will be allowed to remain in the U.S. military. (Image: via YouTube/CNS News)

We have been aggressively advocating for SFC Martland for more than six months, and now we’ve helped achieve a significant victory for this Green Beret war hero.

SFC Martland faced expulsion from the Army for defending a child from sexual abuse and confronting an admitted sexual predator in Afghanistan. The ACLJ argued that his actions—stopping the perpetrator who was violating Afghan law and forcibly removing him from a U.S. military base—were heroic. FULL ARTICLE



The ACLJ had a petition drive to assist in this very thing. Praise God for this victory!:clap: Losing your military career because in the code of protect and defend, children being assaulted by sexual predators don't count when a guest in a foreign nation.Not today! Not today! Thank GOD!
Yes this is fantastic. I would retire from the military now though. It no longer serves the purpose for what is was intended. It is becoming a cess pool of progressive thought.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
 
Upvote 0

s_gunter

Contributor
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2003
8,541
963
Visit site
✟59,965.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes this is fantastic. I would retire from the military now though. It no longer serves the purpose for what is was intended. It is becoming a cess pool of progressive thought.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
He might be *forced* to retire from the military because of this ruling, even though it was the correct ruling. Why? Now he has a target on his back. If he were to stay in the service, those miscreants/terrorists who don't like the ruling will likely retaliate, and they won't care a smidgen about collateral damage. It might be too unsafe for him and his unit to stay in the military because of that.
 
Upvote 0