I believe you meant this post, as that one doesn't talk about the specific time scales at all:
http://www.christianforums.com/thre...f-generating-co2.7881039/page-3#post-67998560
The answer here is simple: it takes time for the planet to respond to changes in CO2 concentration. The changes that are highlighted in those plots took millennia. The current warming has only been significant over the past 45 years or so.
Who you trying to fool? That graph shows you changes in temperature were almost immediately followed by changes in CO2. Or if you prefer the fantasy that the changes in CO2 were immediately followed by changes in temperature. Millenia, I mean just who are you trying to convince, yourself?
I mean look at how closely they
followed one another. Your concept of the required time is clearly an erroneous thought process.
So basically what those graphs say is that there's quite a bit more warming to come even if we stop all fossil fuel burning today.
No, what those graphs say is the current interglacial period is about over with.
That timescale is precisely the problem. It doesn't make sense to look at correlations that appeared over hundreds to thousands of years and try to apply them to the changes in the last 45 years.
Yet you claim to be able to look at correlations that appeared over millions of years and try to apply them incorrectly to everything we know about how reproduction works. I'd say the only thing that doesn't correlate is your theory to the data in either case.
About 20,000 years ago when temperatures rose more steeply than today - then why didn't the CO2 take mellinia to catch up? Or if you want to take your fantasy when the CO2 rose faster than observed today, did not temperature take mellinia to catch up?
And suddenly your own claim works against you.
I really don't know what you're trying to say here, but the Sun has been entirely ruled-out as a significant factor in the recent warming.
Of course it has - just like all the other planets have been ignored by you too.
I'd say that claim is about as correct as the one before.
All the other planets are not warming, though. And those that are are doing so for very different reasons. This has already been pointed out to you. Why have you refused to acknowledge it?
Really? What reasons? If it's by different processes how would you know?
Big Mystery: Jupiter Looses A Stripe
Somehow your "CLAIM" of understanding seems a little shallow.
And? 20,000 years ago it was -8 degrees centigrade globally, so its warmer than it's been in 20,000 years. 125,000 years ago it was +3 degrees globally, 2 degrees warmer than today. Again, despite your claim man has caused it to increase.
See that little tiny extension at the top right? That's what we have done, kept it from reaching past temperatures and delayed the natural fall afterwards.