Or is it more evolutionists looking around to convert the ignorant?
(I'm new. Well it's been a long time, anyway.)
(I'm new. Well it's been a long time, anyway.)
Or is it more evolutionists looking around to convert the ignorant?
(I'm new. Well it's been a long time, anyway.)
It's still better than witch burnings.Evolutionist don't convert the ignorant, they condemn the ignorant.
But I do know that Fundamentalist and Creationists have been indoctrinated with their belief and their faith is steadfast, absolutely nothing you will say will change their mind on any topic regarding the literalism of the Bible
No apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.
Please Stop Lying About Creationists.
Please Stop Misrepresenting, Lying About Science And Distorting Definitions Such As "Theory" And "Fact" To Fit Your Own Needs.
Also I wasn't lying, I've met a lot of Creationists who act in that way and talked to Creationists and Fundamentalists in the "fundie states" - Where they put up signs that Evolution is the tool of Satan and if you believe in it you're going to hell. Where they push their beliefs onto their children, persecute and force them to be fundamentalistic. Where they hate Atheists, Catholics and any other worldview that isn't their own. Where they put fancy stickers in biology text books explaining that Evolution is "just" a theory(Again misrepresenting and distorting the Scientific definition of theory) as if it was a bad thing ...
Both scientists and creationists can agree to the statement "If the evidence contradicts the Bible, then it must be wrong." The difference is that for a scientist, "it" refers to "the Bible", whereas for a creationist, "it" refers to "the evidence".
Or is it more evolutionists looking around to convert the ignorant?
(I'm new. Well it's been a long time, anyway.)