No.Does a person need to be Christian, to be a good person and treat others well? Yes, or no?
EXTREMELY well.Do serial killers treat others well?
............. they go ape?Up until.........................
You don't know much about them, do you?Up until they kill the person they were so nice to.
They don't interact with anyone else?On the contrary.
They charm, then they kill.
Pretty much sums it up.
Thanks for the QED.Sociopath's have incredible charm. The charm is intended to get something they need at the moment.
Why I absolutely love this photo is that you don't know if
- it is photo shopped
- staged
- or completely faked.
Clearly it is not a kitchen picture.
The kid may be laughing because the staged photographer
just pushed the kids face into a cake....and the kid is
just now wiping it off. We can guess, but we can't
measure the event or even recreate the event.
What is the temperature of the mailbox outside your house
60 seconds ago?
Go measure it's temperature 60 seconds ago.
However, though the imaginary process you outline admirably describes how irreducible complexity might theoretically come about for a single system,
I am interested to know how these routes can be seen? The route you describe above has been imagined not seen.
So what? The ID people know you aren't going to buy their research or faith in God/the Bible as support for their position, but that doesn't mean they have no right to slap Darwin's junk around.
It's really a pretty level playing field, they think ours is Junk just as we do theirs, I don't buy your evidence and you don't buy the Bible. What is new here?
My source is flawless and has not been disputed, only ignored.
It remains the same, of course.
First of all, one cannot observe the past. Items in the past may be remembered by some, but they cannot be seen, smelled, heard, tasted, or sensed in any way. Observation is an activity in the present that requires the use of the senses.
Secondly, one cannot predict the past. Prediction is an activity in the present that looks to the future, not the past. An attempt to use the scientific method to determine what happened in the past would be “retrodiction.” “Retrodiction” is a neologism for good reason: science cannot “retrodict.” This will be explained subsequently.
Thirdly, one cannot design experiments or controlled observations to determine what happened in the past. Experiments or controlled observations might help one see if a situation is possible or not possible under a set of defined circumstances, but one cannot design an experiment that will replicate the complex variety of conditions that existed in the past — conditions that are often not known in full detail. An experiment or set of controlled observations also cannot provide information about the order and timing of past events.
After watching my first youtube debate with Bill Nye and Ken Ham and a few since, Nye fanboys were claiming Nye "owned" Ham, but I saw something completely different. It all depends on what side one represents, and if the people have enough sense to be objective.
So I wouldn't read a lot into that title, you can almost bet it's prejudiced and only represents one of the sides way of looking at things.
Lose? we shall see.
Besides, who the losers are is just one sides point of view.
Sure you are arrogant enough to assume that covers it....period, but that doesn't make it so.
Sure it is, I mean what else can we call something that is based on people treating others well and doing good. I mean that HAS to be a terrible thing...how vane is all that? What in the world was wrong with me in thinking Christianity is a good thing?