Hi Lm,
Ok to your 4 responses,
1- My original comments were addressed to post#4 by Papias where he describes an imagined evolution of a lung in a fishpod. This description though interesting and a possible starting point for a scientific investigation is not a demonstration of anything.
IC has likewise not been demonstrated. Behe claims that there are no possible routes by which IC can evolve. You don't need to demonstrate that these routes exist, only that they are possible.
3- The Bible doesn't say evolution is false. It says nothing at all about evolution. But many of those who believe the theory of evolution say the Bible is false. Oh there is lots of conflict but it remains that there is no contradictions between what faith in The Living God is and what science is.
The majority of christians across the globe accept evolution. The question of evolution and the question of the Bible being true are two unrelated questions. As for this atheist, I don't claim that the Bible is false. What I claim is that there is no evidence demonstrating that the Bible is true. While you may not think there is no difference between the two, rest assured there is.
4-As far as Darwinism is concerned I throw away its conclusions because 'the science' doesn't join up, doesn't convince, doesn't demonstrate it's core premise.
Examples?
Upvote
0