Bible eschatology is not about "clues." God doesn't speak revelation to His Church using "clues." He just tells us the way it is. God doesn't try to make you feel better when you're wrong. He just expects you to accept correction, or suffer the fate of the proud.
Get out with that brother, the book of Revelation is one giant code book filled with metaphors, symbology and encoded passages like Rev. 12's The woman (code solved in Gen. 37:9). The 7 Headed Beast represents National Powers who conquered the Mediterranean Sea Region over many years, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome AND the coming Anti-Christ and his 10 (Complete = 10 so Complete Europe Reunited) kings or horns.
Anyone that says its not about clues is not hearing Jesus' plain speak. Listen carefully, Jesus told the Disciples that he speak unto them in parables so that they will see and hear, but the world will not hear or see these things. Saying that there are no clues when God the Father wrote the book of Revelation makes you look like you are not reading the same bible books as me brother. A lot of the book of Daniel still is not understood, go your way Daniel, all this will be LOCKED UP until the very end. So, how did God lock it up? By giving us riddles and clues like the 1260, 1290 and 1335. Most people have zero clue what or when the 1290 or 1335 is. Is that a clue? Or is that straight-line info?
People still think the Anti-Christ will defile the temple at the 1290, when if they understood the real timing they would know he only conquer the region 30 days later at the 1260. If they put it all together they would know the 1290 can only be the 2nd Beast, the False Prophet whom Rev. 13 clearly states places the IMAGE of the Beast up via the peoples. (He gets the people to place the Image or AoD up in the temple). If people really understood all the clues they would know the 1290 does not stop profane meat sacrifices, but instead this Jewish High Priest (F.P.) will stop Jesus worship in the temple, after the Jews repent. Follow the clues and you will know when they repent.
Zech. 13:8-9 says 1/3 of the Jews repent and that 2/3 will refuse to repent and perish/die. Then one verse later in Zech. 14:1 the DOTL arrives (God's Wrath) then in vs. 2 Israel is sacked/conquered. Then in vs. 3 Jesus shows up (1260 days later) to defeat the Beast and al his minions. In Malachi 4:5-6 we see that Elijah will be sent back BEFORE the coming of the Great and Dreadful day of the Lord. So, it all adds up if we follow the clues, Israel repents when the Two-witnesses (1335) shows up, 1335 days before the 2nd coming of Jesus ends all of these wonders (seen in Dan. 11:36-45).
In 2 Thes 2 Paul tells us just the way it is--apostolic truth. The day Christ comes back for his Church will take place *after* Antichrist is revealed. Christ will come back to *destroy Antichrist.*
You, like many others, do not understand this passage at all. 2 Thess. 2 says departure, the first 7 English bibles had departure, not falling away (from the faith). The KJV changed it to take a swipe at their competitor, the RCC (just think, the RCC and the Church of England playing politics 400-500 years ago, when they also tortured people etc. etc. that makes perfect sense). The Latin Vulgate used the word Discisseo (something like that) which means Departure, for 1200 years before the KJV changed it to falling away. There is no faith spoken about in the whole passage, but a Gathering unto Christ is spoken about in he very first verse, we Beseech (ask urgently) by the COMING of our Lord Jesus that you do not be FEARFUL, for that day (God's Wrath) can not come until the DEPARTURE [of the Church] so that is why they should not fear. The later on in the chapter Paul says this:
5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you,
I told you these things? 6 And
now ye know what withholdeth that h
e might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only
he who now letteth(Binds) will let(Bind), until
he be taken out of the way.
So, Paul has already told them they would not be here for the DOTL but some people has told them differently, so Paul is like, I already told you al of this when I was with you before. Now you know what WITHOLDS the Anti-Christ from coming forth, so he can inly be revealed at the time appointed by God or in his own time. So, the Holy Spirit that currently binds the A.C. from coming forth, via the Church he works through, will keep on binding him until he is taken out of the way, or once the Church Departs he will now allow the A.C. to come forth. Jesus told Peter that the gates of hell would not overcome his church. We are not going to be here during the 70th week. We were not here for the first 69 weeks, we will not be here for the 70th week either.
The first seven English translations had DEPARTURE, not falling away [from the faith) The Greek words (Apo) AWAY FROM and (Hestemi) STANDING means the Church will depart from its standing on this earth.
In my blog of 7 years ago I cited the first 7 English translations, so I will paste a wee pit here.
-------------------------------
This insight about the use and meaning of the word was certainly compelling, but the argument Mr. Ice presented that was most convicting was his revelation that the first seven English translations of the Bible rendered the noun, apostasia, as either “departure” or “departing.”
They were as follows:
1.The Wycliffe Bible (1384)
2.The Tyndale Bible (1526)
3. The Coverdale Bible (1535)
4. The Cranmer Bible (1539)
5. The Great Bible (1540)
6. The Beeches Bible (1576)
7. The Geneva Bible (1608)
Mr. Ice also noted that the Bible used by the Western world from 400 AD to the 1500s — Jerome’s Latin translation known as “The Vulgate” — rendered apostasia with the Latin word, discessio, which means “departure.” The first translation of the word to mean apostasy in an English Bible did not occur until 1611 when the King James Version was issued. So, why did the King James translators introduce a completely new rendering of the word as “falling away”? The best guess is that they were taking a stab at the false teachings of Catholicism.
----------------------------------------------------------------
So, that whole point is just not a real point. The Church Departs before the DOTL.
One cannot put it any simpler than that. It takes a hard man to ignore this and then state the opposite in the face of biblical theology.
Study as I have on these things brother, you will see the light. Remember, Satan is very deceptive.
And there are not "clues" about it. This is not esoteric to be deciphered by a Pretrib set of magic glasses. This is biblical theology in black and white. It does not require special revelation or consultation with an "expert" in Pretrib Theology. Rather, this simply requires understanding what Paul is saying plainly. Christ will come to destroy Antichrist and not before!
There are a lot of clues. You have to dig them out because the bible was about the Jews, not Gentiles, we were an inserted because the Jews would not accept Jesus as the 70th week demands. So God put off the 70th week unto after the Gentiles Mission was accomplished, of taking the gospel unto the whole world. Thus is why in Romans 11 Paul says that the Jews will be blinded until the time Gentiles comes full, this means their SERVICE ENDS (Mission complete on take the Gospel unto the whole world). We know this by reading Roman's 9-11 in full, its obvious Paul is speaking about service unto God. God chooses whom he will (to serve him) as the Potter, God chose Jacob over Esau (for service), now God was choosing the Gentiles over the Jews for service, but only for a SET TIME, thus Paul says Gd is not finished with the Jews, they are only blinded (as a nation, not as individuals) until the "Time of the Gentiles" [SERVICE] has come full, or is finished, only then (after the Rapture) will God call Israel unto repentance (see Zech. 13:8-9 and Zech. 14:1). People read these things and look right past these deep hidden truths.
Paul indeed says Jesus will destroy the Anti-Christ one day, but the Church DEPARTS before the DOTL, he then says the A.C. will also show up BEFORE the DOTL. So you miss what he's saying about the timing of the A.C. here. We see in Rev. 19 the Bride marries the Lamb then returns with the Lamb and the Beast is still on earth. We see the Bride in Rev. 4:4, and Rev. 5:9-10, we see the Rapture at the Last Trump in Rev. 4:1. The LAST TRUMP hints at the Rapture, because the Jewish Harvest always ended at the Feast of Trumps. Jesus fulfills all 7 Feasts, the Jews kept these 7 Feasts and did t even understand them. They were Holy Convocations or Dress Rehearsals.
Jesus fulfilled the 1.) Passover (his blood covers Israel and us) the 2.) Unleavened Bread (He knew no sin) and the 3.) First-fruits (he was the First-fruits of the grave. Jesus is now the head or High Priest of the Church (Body of Believers) in heaven, he hears our prayers and his blood cleanses us. The the 4.) Feast of weeks or Church Age/Pentecost is us Harvesting souls for Jesus the master. He is harvesting souls for the Father until the Harvest (Church Age) is over. Then comes the Feast of Trumps, this always ended the Harvest season, thus the whole we will not know the Day nor Hour is a myth as per us not REALLY KNOWING, we will knows by the signs, just not the exact day nor hour. So, why did Jesus use this? Because Israel were on God Time, the New Moon dictated when the Passover came, when the Feast of Trumps came etc. etc. The Jews never knew the exact appointed day, nor hour the New Moon would come in, but they knew (by looking at the phases of the moon) withing a couple of days via the SIGNS (moon phases) and we will also know when its here (as in NOW) by looing at all the signs around us, with a Season.
If Apophis is the DOTL, (I think it is) and there is a pre trib rapture (there is) then Apophis would be in the exact middle of the week, so taking 3.5 years off would not give us the exact day nor hour but it would give us the fall of 2025. So, when this time comes Jesus has to fulfill it himself. He will blow the LAST TRUMP that ends the Summer Harvest (Church Age). When the Jews saw the New Moon they started blowing the Trumps, then on the 100th Trump, that always officially ended the harvest. Notice in Rev. 4:1 Jesus calls us home and John says e sounds as s Trump. I wo der why? So, Jesus fulfills the 5.) Feast of Trumps himself also Then the 6.) Feast of Atonement comes, Israel must repent according to the Dan. 9:24-27 before the 70th week can end. and we see they do in Zech. 13:8-9, just before the DOTL falls in Zech. 14:1. They can only receive Atonement however by the blood of Jesus so he fulfills this also. Lastly we see, the 7.) Feast of Tabernacles, and to tabernacle's simply means to Dwell with God. So, Jesus dwelling in Jerusalem for 1000 years during the Kingdom Age fulfills this also, and thus Jesus fulfills al 7 Feasts. So, why would you think Jesus does not fulfill the Feat of Trumps and end the Harvest (Church Age)? It much deeper than you suppose, and clues like this are all through the bible.
It amuses me that via my calling of nigh 40 years to prophecy, I get people not called unto the ministries, trying to teach me about these things because they read so mans understanding and repeat it. Me say all kinds of things brother, do not follow men ideas, they lead us down wrong paths in many cases.
I was once Pretrib in my theology. I got that from others and am not ashamed that I picked up theology from good Christians around me. But I'm more proud that I was willing to change when I read 2 Thessalonians for myself, and actually chose to accept what I was reading. I didn't get caught up in what "apostasia" meant, nor did I get distracted by who the "Restrainer" was. I just accepted what I did see and understand, because it was right there, no matter what anything else said.
This comes from you not understanding 2 Thess. 2. The whole passage is about the Rapture in verse 1 but you MISS it because you accepted the bad KJV translation that this is Apostacy (Departure from the faith or a falling away, when NOWHERE in the whole passage is faith ever mentioned, I challenge you to find it brother, it is not there). But a Gathering unto Christ Jesus is there in vs. 1.
There is a reason Darby got this wrong, and it's called the theology of Imminent Expectation. This was never taught in the historic Church. If you think it was please correct me--I'm open. Who ever taught that Christ can come "at any moment?" Please give me an example of such a thing prior to Darby?
This is more wrong info. Paul wrote the Rapture scriptures. So, the Rapture is pf God, not Darby.
I really don't know if he came up with this idea. I'd truly like to know where the idea began? I'm quite sincere about this. I just have a hard time believing that any Christian school of thought ever included the idea that Christ could come before the revelation of Antichrist, and certainly not "on any day." Please show me! I'm talking about any time this may have happened *before Darby.*
Paul wrote to tell the Thessalonians in 2 Thess. 2, and in Thess. 4 and also the Corinthians (1 Cor. 15) about the Rapture. Jesus tells the Jews about the Rapture in a secretive way in Matt. 24:36-51 because his ministry was unto Israel only, but when they asked him when would these things be (destruction of the temple) and what would be the end of the age AND the sign of his [second] coming he had to tell them both way Jews would see his coming, the Church Jews would be taken at the Rapture, the Jews who repent and are protected in Patra will see him coming in the Eastern Skies (Matt. 24:29-31) and live with Jesus as humans a the Kingdom Age, still having children etc. etc. But Jesus said in vs. 36 that no man would know the day nor hour (which fulfills the Feast of Trumps) but how can that be the Second Coming? We all know exactly how many days the Beast is going to rule, 1260 days, so how is it no one knows the day Jesus is going to return? We can all ad up to 1260 is suppose. So, that does not fit for the 2nd coming, it only fits a Pre Trib Rapture point in time.
Jesus said it would the as in the Days of Noah, (people would be acting normal) eating, drinking, marrying and giving in marriage until the very day Noah entered the Ark, then the flood came and took them all away. This can not possibly be the 2nd coming, add it up, id does not fit at all. So, at the 2nd coming the people on earth will just have went through the Wrath of God (DOTL) for 1260 days, (this is THE FLOOD of Noah part) they see 1/3 of those who took the Mark of the Beast killed, they are in hiding from God's plagues, they hide in caves, but you want me to believe (REALLY?) that the 2nd coming will be a surprise to these people, COME ON Brother !! The only shock surprise will be when Jesus comes for his bride Pre Trib. Nothing else can catch the whole world be surprise.
So shall the coming of the Son of Man (Jesus be) and then vs 40 says one will be taken on one will be left. Well, Jesus has told us that only 5 of the 10 Virgins will be ready for the wedding call. So, that is the exact same ratio, 1 in 2 is 5 of 10. Verse 42 says watch for you know not which hour your lord will come, but that only fits the Pre Trib, we know the exact day of the 2nd coming by counting the Beasts time as ruler over Israel, there can be no surprise. So, the 2nd coming can not be what this passage is referring unto.
There is so much to dig out that 100 percent shows when the rapture is, there is nothing that suggests the church is on earth during the 70th week, not one verse anywhere suggests that, you put of forth and I will will prove why its a false notion.