Well, Latham isn't a Christian, so it's really no surprise that it wouldn't interest him.artofwar said:very interesting , the first bit was quite positive then this david millikin came on to say we are in coherts with the liberal party haha , i liked the fact that brian said they invited mark latham but he was not interested.
Glacial said:Well, Latham isn't a Christian, so it's really no surprise that it wouldn't interest him.
Still, yet another reason to support Latham this election. He looks like he's going to respect the separation of church and state, and actually focus on his job instead of evangelizing to people like Peter Costello does.
lololol....hahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaha7:30 Report said:DR DAVID MILLIKAN: I think Peter Costello has deep religious feelings within him.
I actually think that he feels that he has been destined by God to be the prime minister.
I'm sure he feels that in his very being.
ok, I admit, I didn't watch the program today as I normally would because I was at Bible Study.DAVID MILLIKAN: The mainline churches are more problematic.
The mainline churches ask questions about refugee policy, about welfare policy and, see, the Howard Government has a very troubled relationship with people who question or argue about the justice or equity of what's happening in Australia.
They'll never get that discussion from Hillsong.
eh? anglicans are mean to hillsong?Icystwolf said:Just to warn a couple of people here that just because she's mean to hillsong doesn't mean she's automatically anglican.
I think there are different catagories for evangelism. There are some that deem a person a cancer just because they don't believe what they say. I was told I was going to hell unless I went along some particular church that had guarentee tickets...Glacial said:I understand the need of some Christians to evangelize (thankfully most don't), but I object to it when Costello doesn't make it clear that he's doing it as a private individual.
Have you watched what goes on in the parliment house, the swear words and name calling goes all around... which makes it quite interesting...lol... I think it might be necessary, before another affair goes about the labor camp...lol....Recently he's been announcing that everyone should follow the ten commandments in the official capacity as a parliamentarian.
I don't think he ridiculed any minority groups. So I don't feel as if thats the extent of the problem...There are over 200,000 Muslim Australians, 350,000 Buddhist Australians etc. It isn't the place of any politician to be promoting one religion over another. How would you like it if I got up as a federal politician and ridiculed Christianity, urged people to become Humanists, and generally grandstanded about atheism or humanism?
I would be very annoyed..yes!Furthermore, what would your reaction be if a Muslim politician got up and evangelized, urging us to do what the Koran tells us?
Costello never imposed religion, he just endorsed it. The outrage I thought was that he intended to gain more votes by going to Hillsong, because it is a push-over target...If Costello wants to go and preach on a street corner, the fine. But he should clearly state that these are his personal views, and he should concurrently avoid imposing his religion on others.
Granted, i'm no expert on the 'levels' of evangelism, in this sense I'm essentially using it to describe preaching about a particular religion...Icystwolf said:I think there are different catagories for evangelism. There are some that deem a person a cancer just because they don't believe what they say. I was told I was going to hell unless I went along some particular church that had guarentee tickets...
Ah, so you're a Calvinist then. I actually didn't notice that, I've always found Calvinism to be a bit, well, strange. I've never understood how it could be supported, but perhaps we might get to that in the Aus Elections thread, who knows.I would personally, like all my friends to get to know God because I'd like to see them all in Heaven. But at the same time, I know from what the scriptures says... a lot of people won't be Christian, because they wern't born Christian(not literally, but theres a theology tag to that of why I think that way...also because I'm a Calvinist). Thats something that I have to accept.
I agree that parliament is essentially an all-out brawl most of the time, but I'm not too sure that there's anything in the ten commandments that addresses that.Have you watched what goes on in the parliment house, the swear words and name calling goes all around... which makes it quite interesting...lol... I think it might be necessary, before another affair goes about the labor camp...lol....
Simply by telling people to follow the ten commandments in an interview in an official capacity, I see that as being disrespectful to minority religions -- and Aboriginal religions. The first commandment in particular tells people to follow the Christian god and that god alone, and IMHO -- that's not something that the federal treasurer should be getting involved in.I don't think he ridiculed any minority groups. So I don't feel as if thats the extent of the problem...
That's basically how I feel when Costello starts preaching. I wouldn't preach about humanism if I was in parliament, so I don't see why Costello feels the need to preach about Chrisitanity.I would be very annoyed..yes!
Islam it'll be on a rise again, because Islam excelled in trade. If we have globalisation, Islam will be on the next wave!
Sorry, that was badly phrased on my part. I think it was somewhere in between myself. He went a bit further than endorsing it -- some of his language was leaning towards a confrontational 'obey the commandments!' type of thing.Costello never imposed religion, he just endorsed it. The outrage I thought was that he intended to gain more votes by going to Hillsong, because it is a push-over target...
in the perspective of Hillsong.lullalullaby said:eh? anglicans are mean to hillsong?
Unfortunately you are 100% correct - MOST CHRISTIANS FAIL TO EVANGELISE... and we wonder why our churches are falling down... the bigger churches like Hillsong are trying to reverse this trend by empowering the people, reminding them THEY are the ministers of the gospel, and it shouldn't be up to the pastor... that age old philosophy makes Christians lazy and we lose the battle with religion.Glacial said:I understand the need of some Christians to evangelize (thankfully most don't)
I would be most angry! Know why? This nation was founded on Biblical principles and morals... if people want to come out here, fine. We welcome them with open arms - BUT - they have no right to enforce their religion on us... we already have a strong Christian heritage and we should be keeping it that way. However, we find that we have relaxed too much and consequently we are losing this heritage. And our society loses its morals. THe snowball rolls on... And YES we have enough people already saying Humanism is the way to go... like we need anymore of that ... there are too many dissenting voices as it is!Glacial said:There are over 200,000 Muslim Australians, 350,000 Buddhist Australians etc. It isn't the place of any politician to be promoting one religion over another. How would you like it if I got up as a federal politician and ridiculed Christianity, urged people to become Humanists, and generally grandstanded about atheism or humanism? Furthermore, what would your reaction be if a Muslim politician got up and evangelized, urging us to do what the Koran tells us?
You are of course correct here. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Catholicism in fact growing in Australia? I've never seen a Catholic evangelize, so growth can be achieved without preaching.LivingWorship said:Unfortunately you are 100% correct - MOST CHRISTIANS FAIL TO EVANGELISE... and we wonder why our churches are falling down... the bigger churches like Hillsong are trying to reverse this trend by empowering the people, reminding them THEY are the ministers of the gospel, and it shouldn't be up to the pastor... that age old philosophy makes Christians lazy and we lose the battle with religion.
Is there any reference to the bible or religion in our constitution? The answer is of course no, so your point is moot.I would be most angry! Know why? This nation was founded on Biblical principles and morals...
Right, just as Christians have no right to force their religion on anyone else either.if people want to come out here, fine. We welcome them with open arms - BUT - they have no right to enforce their religion on us...
Well, not really. As mentioned, our legal system in act is completely separate from Christianity, and a lot of our laws really depart from Christian principles and 'rules'. If our founders wanted us to have been a Christian nation, then they'd have said so in our constitution. Thankfully, they didn't -- and as such you don't have any support for your position. It really doesn't matter if the majority of people who came here early on were Christians, being a Christian doesn't automatically mean that you support setting up a theocracy.we already have a strong Christian heritage and we should be keeping it that way.
I'd agree with that, Christianity is certainly on the decline. I don't see that as a bad thing (although i'd be sad to see the Uniting & Anglican churches go), but obviously you will.However, we find that we have relaxed too much and consequently we are losing this heritage.
I disagree with that, as Christianity declines, IMHO we actually become more moral. Discrimination against gays goes down, there's no more hysteria over contraception and birth control -- we're free to partake in stem cell research. Women get rights, divorce becomes possible -- and we generally become far more tolerant and easy-going. Slavery is also easier to end, as the bible tends to support that kind of thing, just as it supports the killing of witches.And our society loses its morals.
On the contrary, the more people advocating humanism, the better for humanity. Many Christians act very much like humanists now, which is a fantastic thing IMHO.THe snowball rolls on... And YES we have enough people already saying Humanism is the way to go... like we need anymore of that ****...
This is almost orwellian, where on earth did you acquire this authoritarian streak?there are too many dissenting voices as it is!
Actually, I hope we'll have some Muslims in parliament ASAP -- many Australians are Muslims, and they shouldn't just be represented by white Christian males. Just as we should have some Buddhists in parliament, and more women. Diversity is a good thing.You say it's no place for a "pollie" to be preaching... but I tell you - God forbid if a Muslim makes it to Parliament
Are you clairvoyant? No? If no, how on earth would you be able to predict something like that?they will speak for all they are worth about the good of Islam.
A Muslim PM? How horrible! We've already had Christian PMs, it's about time that someone else had a go. As long as they keep their religion to themselves, i'd certainly vote for an Islamic PM.You know that there are some Muslims about who have an agenda for this nation... to have an Islamic PM by the year 2040 or something like that.
You appear to believe that all Muslims are fundamentalists. They aren't. As long as the MPs in question aren't fundamentalists, then I can't see why we shouldn't have Muslim MPs. I don't know where you get the idea that the nation would turn upside down either.Can you imagine if our Parliament was essentially run by a Muslim... and with that, several key MP's were Muslim.. this nation would turn upside down!
I really don't see why you're so worried, moderate Muslims aren't anything to be afraid of. Go out and meet some, they're generally great people.Do you wonder why Christians need to stand up and be counted - even politicians? We have a battle on our hands!!